Static Code Analysis Strategy

Complete Self-Assessment Guide

The guidance in this Self-Assessment is based on Static Code Analysis Strategy best practices and standards in business process architecture, design and quality management. The guidance is also based on the professional judgment of the individual collaborators listed in the Acknowledgments.

Notice of rights

You are licensed to use the Self-Assessment contents in your presentations and materials for internal use and customers without asking us - we are here to help.

All rights reserved for the book itself: this book may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

The information in this book is distributed on an “As Is” basis without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of he book, neither the author nor the publisher shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained in this book or by the products described in it.

Trademarks

Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark claim, the designations appear as requested by the owner of the trademark. All other product names and services identified throughout this book are used in editorial fashion only and for the benefit of such companies with no intention of infringement of the trademark. No such use, or the use of any trade name, is intended to convey endorsement or other affiliation with this book.

Copyright © by The Art of Service

http://theartofservice.com

service@theartofservice.com

About The Art of Service

The Art of Service, Business Process Architects since 2000, is dedicated to helping stakeholders achieve excellence.

Defining, designing, creating, and implementing a process to solve a stakeholders challenge or meet an objective is the most valuable role… In EVERY group, company, organization and department.

Unless you’re talking a one-time, single-use project, there should be a process. Whether that process is managed and implemented by humans, AI, or a combination of the two, it needs to be designed by someone with a complex enough perspective to ask the right questions.

Someone capable of asking the right questions and step back and say, ‘What are we really trying to accomplish here? And is there a different way to look at it?’

With The Art of Service’s Standard Requirements Self-Assessments, we empower people who can do just that — whether their title is marketer, entrepreneur, manager, salesperson, consultant, Business Process Manager, executive assistant, IT Manager, CIO etc… —they are the people who rule the future. They are people who watch the process as it happens, and ask the right questions to make the process work better.

Contact us when you need any support with this Self-Assessment and any help with templates, blue-prints and examples of standard documents you might need:

http://theartofservice.com

service@theartofservice.com

Included Resources - how to access

Included with your purchase of the book is the Static Code Analysis Strategy Self-Assessment Spreadsheet Dashboard which contains all questions and Self-Assessment areas and auto-generates insights, graphs, and project RACI planning - all with examples to get you started right away.

How? Simply send an email to

access@theartofservice.com

with this books’ title in the subject to get the Static Code Analysis Strategy Self Assessment Tool right away.

You will receive the following contents with New and Updated specific criteria:

•The latest quick edition of the book in PDF

•The latest complete edition of the book in PDF, which criteria correspond to the criteria in…

•The Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard, and…

•Example pre-filled Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard to get familiar with results generation

•In-depth specific Checklists covering the topic

•Project management checklists and templates to assist with implementation

INCLUDES LIFETIME SELF ASSESSMENT UPDATES

Every self assessment comes with Lifetime Updates and Lifetime Free Updated Books. Lifetime Updates is an industry-first feature which allows you to receive verified self assessment updates, ensuring you always have the most accurate information at your fingertips.

Get it now- you will be glad you did - do it now, before you forget.

Send an email to access@theartofservice.com with this books’ title in the subject to get the Static Code Analysis Strategy Self Assessment Tool right away.

Purpose of this Self-Assessment

This Self-Assessment has been developed to improve understanding of the requirements and elements of Static Code Analysis Strategy, based on best practices and standards in business process architecture, design and quality management.

It is designed to allow for a rapid Self-Assessment to determine how closely existing management practices and procedures correspond to the elements of the Self-Assessment.

The criteria of requirements and elements of Static Code Analysis Strategy have been rephrased in the format of a Self-Assessment questionnaire, with a seven-criterion scoring system, as explained in this document.

In this format, even with limited background knowledge of Static Code Analysis Strategy, a manager can quickly review existing operations to determine how they measure up to the standards. This in turn can serve as the starting point of a ‘gap analysis’ to identify management tools or system elements that might usefully be implemented in the organization to help improve overall performance.

How to use the Self-Assessment

On the following pages are a series of questions to identify to what extent your Static Code Analysis Strategy initiative is complete in comparison to the requirements set in standards.

To facilitate answering the questions, there is a space in front of each question to enter a score on a scale of ‘1’ to ‘5’.

1 Strongly Disagree

2 Disagree

3 Neutral

4 Agree

5 Strongly Agree

Read the question and rate it with the following in front of mind:

‘In my belief,

the answer to this question is clearly defined’.

There are two ways in which you can choose to interpret this statement;

1.how aware are you that the answer to the question is clearly defined

2.for more in-depth analysis you can choose to gather evidence and confirm the answer to the question. This obviously will take more time, most Self-Assessment users opt for the first way to interpret the question and dig deeper later on based on the outcome of the overall Self-Assessment.

A score of ‘1’ would mean that the answer is not clear at all, where a ‘5’ would mean the answer is crystal clear and defined. Leave emtpy when the question is not applicable or you don’t want to answer it, you can skip it without affecting your score. Write your score in the space provided.

After you have responded to all the appropriate statements in each section, compute your average score for that section, using the formula provided, and round to the nearest tenth. Then transfer to the corresponding spoke in the Static Code Analysis Strategy Scorecard on the second next page of the Self-Assessment.

Your completed Static Code Analysis Strategy Scorecard will give you a clear presentation of which Static Code Analysis Strategy areas need attention.

Static Code Analysis Strategy

Scorecard Example

Example of how the finalized Scorecard can look like:

Static Code Analysis Strategy

Scorecard

Your Scores:

BEGINNING OF THE

SELF-ASSESSMENT:

CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE

INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. What activities does the governance board need to consider?

<– Score

2. How are training requirements identified?

<– Score

3. What else needs to be measured?

<– Score

4. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?

<– Score

5. How many trainings, in total, are needed?

<– Score

6. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?

<– Score

7. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?

<– Score

8. Who needs what information?

<– Score

9. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?

<– Score

10. What is the extent or complexity of the static code analysis strategy problem?

<– Score

11. Consider your own static code analysis strategy project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?

<– Score

12. Is the need for organizational change recognized?

<– Score

13. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?

<– Score

14. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?

<– Score

15. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?

<– Score

16. Think about the people you identified for your static code analysis strategy project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?

<– Score

17. Will it solve real problems?

<– Score

18. What static code analysis strategy coordination do you need?

<– Score

19. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?

<– Score

20. What vendors make products that address the static code analysis strategy needs?

<– Score

21. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?

<– Score

22. Are there static code analysis strategy problems defined?

<– Score

23. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate static code analysis strategy delivery, for example is new software needed?

<– Score

24. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?

<– Score

25. How do you recognize an static code analysis strategy objection?

<– Score

26. What creative shifts do you need to take?

<– Score

27. Will static code analysis strategy deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?

<– Score

28. What problems are you facing and how do you consider static code analysis strategy will circumvent those obstacles?

<– Score

29. Where do you need to exercise leadership?

<– Score

30. Who else hopes to benefit from it?

<– Score

31. What are the clients issues and concerns?

<– Score

32. Which issues are too important to ignore?

<– Score

33. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?

<– Score

34. Who needs to know about static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

35. Is it needed?

<– Score

36. Which information does the static code analysis strategy business case need to include?

<– Score

37. How do you recognize an objection?

<– Score

38. How are the static code analysis strategy’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?

<– Score

39. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?

<– Score

40. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?

<– Score

41. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?

<– Score

42. Do you need different information or graphics?

<– Score

43. Why is this needed?

<– Score

44. Does your organization need more static code analysis strategy education?

<– Score

45. Are there any revenue recognition issues?

<– Score

46. What information do users need?

<– Score

47. How are you going to measure success?

<– Score

48. Are there recognized static code analysis strategy problems?

<– Score

49. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?

<– Score

50. Why the need?

<– Score

51. Who needs to know?

<– Score

52. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize static code analysis strategy as an effective investment?

<– Score

53. What are the static code analysis strategy resources needed?

<– Score

54. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?

<– Score

55. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the static code analysis strategy team, static code analysis strategy itself?

<– Score

56. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?

<– Score

57. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?

<– Score

58. What needs to be done?

<– Score

59. What is the recognized need?

<– Score

60. What needs to stay?

<– Score

61. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?

<– Score

62. Who needs budgets?

<– Score

63. What static code analysis strategy capabilities do you need?

<– Score

64. What extra resources will you need?

<– Score

65. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?

<– Score

66. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?

<– Score

67. What are your needs in relation to static code analysis strategy skills, labor, equipment, and markets?

<– Score

68. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?

<– Score

69. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?

<– Score

70. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

71. What static code analysis strategy problem should be solved?

<– Score

72. Which needs are not included or involved?

<– Score

73. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?

<– Score

74. What situation(s) led to this static code analysis strategy Self Assessment?

<– Score

75. What would happen if static code analysis strategy weren’t done?

<– Score

76. Do you recognize static code analysis strategy achievements?

<– Score

77. Do you need to avoid or amend any static code analysis strategy activities?

<– Score

78. Whom do you really need or want to serve?

<– Score

79. Does static code analysis strategy create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?

<– Score

80. How do you assess your static code analysis strategy workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?

<– Score

81. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom static code analysis strategy project?

<– Score

82. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in static code analysis strategy? In other words, what are the risks, if static code analysis strategy does not deliver successfully?

<– Score

83. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?

<– Score

84. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying static code analysis strategy research related to market response and models?

<– Score

85. Have you identified your static code analysis strategy key performance indicators?

<– Score

86. Who should resolve the static code analysis strategy issues?

<– Score

87. Is the quality assurance team identified?

<– Score

88. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

89. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?

<– Score

90. What is the problem or issue?

<– Score

91. What static code analysis strategy events should you attend?

<– Score

92. What does static code analysis strategy success mean to the stakeholders?

<– Score

93. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?

<– Score

94. What is the static code analysis strategy problem definition? What do you need to resolve?

<– Score

95. What are the expected benefits of static code analysis strategy to the stakeholder?

<– Score

96. What do employees need in the short term?

<– Score

97. Where is training needed?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the static code analysis strategy Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. What sort of initial information to gather?

<– Score

2. What are the record-keeping requirements of static code analysis strategy activities?

<– Score

3. How are consistent static code analysis strategy definitions important?

<– Score

4. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

<– Score

5. Do you have a static code analysis strategy success story or case study ready to tell and share?

<– Score

6. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected static code analysis strategy results are met?

<– Score

7. What are the requirements for audit information?

<– Score

8. How does the static code analysis strategy manager ensure against scope creep?

<– Score

9. The political context: who holds power?

<– Score

10. Who approved the static code analysis strategy scope?

<– Score

11. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

<– Score

12. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

<– Score

13. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

<– Score

14. What static code analysis strategy services do you require?

<– Score

15. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

<– Score

16. How do you gather static code analysis strategy requirements?

<– Score

17. Are the static code analysis strategy requirements complete?

<– Score

18. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

<– Score

19. How do you manage changes in static code analysis strategy requirements?

<– Score

20. How have you defined all static code analysis strategy requirements first?

<– Score

21. What is the scope of the static code analysis strategy effort?

<– Score

22. How do you catch static code analysis strategy definition inconsistencies?

<– Score

23. What is the definition of static code analysis strategy excellence?

<– Score

24. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to static code analysis strategy changes?

<– Score

25. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

<– Score

26. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

<– Score

27. How did the static code analysis strategy manager receive input to the development of a static code analysis strategy improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

<– Score

28. How do you manage scope?

<– Score

29. What is the scope of the static code analysis strategy work?

<– Score

30. Is static code analysis strategy required?

<– Score

31. What is out-of-scope initially?

<– Score

32. What is in scope?

<– Score

33. What defines best in class?

<– Score

34. How do you think the partners involved in static code analysis strategy would have defined success?

<– Score

35. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<– Score

36. What would be the goal or target for a static code analysis strategy’s improvement team?

<– Score

37. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

<– Score

38. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

<– Score

39. What is the scope of static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

40. What is the definition of success?

<– Score

41. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

<– Score

42. How will the static code analysis strategy team and the group measure complete success of static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

43. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does static code analysis strategy leverage and how?

<– Score

44. How do you build the right business case?

<– Score

45. Has a static code analysis strategy requirement not been met?

<– Score

46. Are there different segments of customers?

<– Score

47. When is/was the static code analysis strategy start date?

<– Score

48. What happens if static code analysis strategy’s scope changes?

<– Score

49. Are task requirements clearly defined?

<– Score

50. Do you all define static code analysis strategy in the same way?

<– Score

51. How do you hand over static code analysis strategy context?

<– Score

52. What is the context?

<– Score

53. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

<– Score

54. How would you define static code analysis strategy leadership?

<– Score

55. Does the scope remain the same?

<– Score

56. How can the value of static code analysis strategy be defined?

<– Score

57. Are the static code analysis strategy requirements testable?

<– Score

58. What are the core elements of the static code analysis strategy business case?

<– Score

59. Is there any additional static code analysis strategy definition of success?

<– Score

60. Who is gathering static code analysis strategy information?

<– Score

61. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

<– Score

62. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

63. Is the static code analysis strategy scope manageable?

<– Score

64. Are accountability and ownership for static code analysis strategy clearly defined?

<– Score

65. Scope of sensitive information?

<– Score

66. Why are you doing static code analysis strategy and what is the scope?

<– Score

67. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that static code analysis strategy brings?

<– Score

68. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

<– Score

69. Has the static code analysis strategy work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

<– Score

70. Where can you gather more information?

<– Score

71. Is there a critical path to deliver static code analysis strategy results?

<– Score

72. Is static code analysis strategy currently on schedule according to the plan?

<– Score

73. What are the static code analysis strategy use cases?

<– Score

74. Is the scope of static code analysis strategy defined?

<– Score

75. What are the static code analysis strategy tasks and definitions?

<– Score

76. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the static code analysis strategy goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

<– Score

77. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

<– Score

78. What scope to assess?

<– Score

79. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

<– Score

80. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

<– Score

81. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

<– Score

82. How and when will the baselines be defined?

<– Score

83. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

<– Score

84. Is there a clear static code analysis strategy case definition?

<– Score

85. When is the estimated completion date?

<– Score

86. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

<– Score

87. Have all basic functions of static code analysis strategy been defined?

<– Score

88. What knowledge or experience is required?

<– Score

89. How do you gather requirements?

<– Score

90. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

<– Score

91. Is static code analysis strategy linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

<– Score

92. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

<– Score

93. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

<– Score

94. Is the static code analysis strategy scope complete and appropriately sized?

<– Score

95. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

<– Score

96. What system do you use for gathering static code analysis strategy information?

<– Score

97. What information do you gather?

<– Score

98. What is the worst case scenario?

<– Score

99. Are all requirements met?

<– Score

100. What static code analysis strategy requirements should be gathered?

<– Score

101. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

<– Score

102. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

<– Score

103. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

<– Score

104. What sources do you use to gather information for a static code analysis strategy study?

<– Score

105. Who is gathering information?

<– Score

106. What is out of scope?

<– Score

107. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform static code analysis strategy work? How is the team addressing them?

<– Score

108. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

<– Score

109. How do you gather the stories?

<– Score

110. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

<– Score

111. Has your scope been defined?

<– Score

112. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

<– Score

113. What are (control) requirements for static code analysis strategy Information?

<– Score

114. Are resources adequate for the scope?

<– Score

115. Has the direction changed at all during the course of static code analysis strategy? If so, when did it change and why?

<– Score

116. Is scope creep really all bad news?

<– Score

117. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

<– Score

118. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

<– Score

119. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

<– Score

120. What intelligence can you gather?

<– Score

121. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

<– Score

122. What information should you gather?

<– Score

123. Is special static code analysis strategy user knowledge required?

<– Score

124. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

<– Score

125. Will a static code analysis strategy production readiness review be required?

<– Score

126. How do you manage unclear static code analysis strategy requirements?

<– Score

127. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

<– Score

128. What was the context?

<– Score

129. What are the tasks and definitions?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the static code analysis strategy Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Are the units of measure consistent?

<– Score

2. What does a Test Case verify?

<– Score

3. What is the cause of any static code analysis strategy gaps?

<– Score

4. How do you measure lifecycle phases?

<– Score

5. What do you measure and why?

<– Score

6. What is the cost of rework?

<– Score

7. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?

<– Score

8. What are the costs and benefits?

<– Score

9. How do your measurements capture actionable static code analysis strategy information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?

<– Score

10. Who pays the cost?

<– Score

11. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger static code analysis strategy results?

<– Score

12. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

<– Score

13. Have you included everything in your static code analysis strategy cost models?

<– Score

14. What are the costs?

<– Score

15. What is measured? Why?

<– Score

16. What does losing customers cost your organization?

<– Score

17. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

<– Score

18. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

<– Score

19. Does management have the right priorities among projects?

<– Score

20. What potential environmental factors impact the static code analysis strategy effort?

<– Score

21. What evidence is there and what is measured?

<– Score

22. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?

<– Score

23. How do you verify your resources?

<– Score

24. The approach of traditional static code analysis strategy works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?

<– Score

25. Does a static code analysis strategy quantification method exist?

<– Score

26. What are the operational costs after static code analysis strategy deployment?

<– Score

27. How are measurements made?

<– Score

28. Does the static code analysis strategy task fit the client’s priorities?

<– Score

29. How are you verifying it?

<– Score

30. What does verifying compliance entail?

<– Score

31. Who should receive measurement reports?

<– Score

32. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

<– Score

33. What is the total fixed cost?

<– Score

34. How sensitive must the static code analysis strategy strategy be to cost?

<– Score

35. What is your decision requirements diagram?

<– Score

36. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?

<– Score

37. Where can you go to verify the info?

<– Score

38. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

<– Score

39. How do you verify if static code analysis strategy is built right?

<– Score

40. What tests verify requirements?

<– Score

41. Has a cost center been established?

<– Score

42. What are the costs of delaying static code analysis strategy action?

<– Score

43. How frequently do you verify your static code analysis strategy strategy?

<– Score

44. How can you measure static code analysis strategy in a systematic way?

<– Score

45. Which measures and indicators matter?

<– Score

46. What users will be impacted?

<– Score

47. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

<– Score

48. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?

<– Score

49. Is the cost worth the static code analysis strategy effort ?

<– Score

50. How do you measure variability?

<– Score

51. What do people want to verify?

<– Score

52. How will success or failure be measured?

<– Score

53. How do you measure success?

<– Score

54. What relevant entities could be measured?

<– Score

55. How do you verify performance?

<– Score

56. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

<– Score

57. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

<– Score

58. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?

<– Score

59. What measurements are being captured?

<– Score

60. What would it cost to replace your technology?

<– Score

61. What are allowable costs?

<– Score

62. Are missed static code analysis strategy opportunities costing your organization money?

<– Score

63. What harm might be caused?

<– Score

64. What is your static code analysis strategy quality cost segregation study?

<– Score

65. How to cause the change?

<– Score

66. Are there competing static code analysis strategy priorities?

<– Score

67. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?

<– Score

68. How is progress measured?

<– Score

69. How is performance measured?

<– Score

70. What are you verifying?

<– Score

71. What causes mismanagement?

<– Score

72. Which costs should be taken into account?

<– Score

73. What are your key static code analysis strategy organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?

<– Score

74. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

<– Score

75. How do you verify static code analysis strategy completeness and accuracy?

<– Score

76. What could cause you to change course?

<– Score

77. Are the measurements objective?

<– Score

78. What are the static code analysis strategy investment costs?

<– Score

79. Why a static code analysis strategy focus?

<– Score

80. How will you measure success?

<– Score

81. How can you reduce costs?

<– Score

82. Is a follow-up focused external static code analysis strategy review required?

<– Score

83. Do you have any cost static code analysis strategy limitation requirements?

<– Score

84. How much does it cost?

<– Score

85. How will your organization measure success?

<– Score

86. Is the solution cost-effective?

<– Score

87. Among the static code analysis strategy product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

<– Score

88. What causes investor action?

<– Score

89. What are the static code analysis strategy key cost drivers?

<– Score

90. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?

<– Score

91. How do you measure efficient delivery of static code analysis strategy services?

<– Score

92. What are the current costs of the static code analysis strategy process?

<– Score

93. Are there measurements based on task performance?

<– Score

94. Are indirect costs charged to the static code analysis strategy program?

<– Score

95. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?

<– Score

96. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?

<– Score

97. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?

<– Score

98. Are static code analysis strategy vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?

<– Score

99. Where is the cost?

<– Score

100. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?

<– Score

101. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

<– Score

102. What would be a real cause for concern?

<– Score

103. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?

<– Score

104. Who is involved in verifying compliance?

<– Score

105. How will costs be allocated?

<– Score

106. Are the static code analysis strategy benefits worth its costs?

<– Score

107. Which static code analysis strategy impacts are significant?

<– Score

108. What are hidden static code analysis strategy quality costs?

<– Score

109. Are you able to realize any cost savings?

<– Score

110. Will static code analysis strategy have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?

<– Score

111. How do you verify the static code analysis strategy requirements quality?

<– Score

112. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

<– Score

113. What is the total cost related to deploying static code analysis strategy, including any consulting or professional services?

<– Score

114. What are the strategic priorities for this year?

<– Score

115. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?

<– Score

116. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?

<– Score

117. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

<– Score

118. What does your operating model cost?

<– Score

119. How will effects be measured?

<– Score

120. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?

<– Score

121. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

<– Score

122. What are your customers expectations and measures?

<– Score

123. What are your operating costs?

<– Score

124. What could cause delays in the schedule?

<– Score

125. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

<– Score

126. What is the static code analysis strategy business impact?

<– Score

127. Where is it measured?

<– Score

128. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

<– Score

129. What drives O&M cost?

<– Score

130. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?

<– Score

131. How do you verify and validate the static code analysis strategy data?

<– Score

132. When are costs are incurred?

<– Score

133. What are the types and number of measures to use?

<– Score

134. How are costs allocated?

<– Score

135. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?

<– Score

136. Have design-to-cost goals been established?

<– Score

137. What can be used to verify compliance?

<– Score

138. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent static code analysis strategy services/products?

<– Score

139. What is an unallowable cost?

<– Score

140. What details are required of the static code analysis strategy cost structure?

<– Score

141. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the static code analysis strategy Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:

INTENT: Analyze causes, assumptions and hypotheses.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. What controls do you have in place to protect data?

<– Score

2. What internal processes need improvement?

<– Score

3. What types of data do your static code analysis strategy indicators require?

<– Score

4. What process should you select for improvement?

<– Score

5. What qualifications and skills do you need?

<– Score

6. What quality tools were used to get through the analyze phase?

<– Score

7. Has an output goal been set?

<– Score

8. What qualifications do static code analysis strategy leaders need?

<– Score

9. What will drive static code analysis strategy change?

<– Score

10. Have any additional benefits been identified that will result from closing all or most of the gaps?

<– Score

11. What are your static code analysis strategy processes?

<– Score

12. Have the problem and goal statements been updated to reflect the additional knowledge gained from the analyze phase?

<– Score

13. How will the data be checked for quality?

<– Score

14. How many input/output points does it require?

<– Score

15. What process improvements will be needed?

<– Score

16. Is the suppliers process defined and controlled?

<– Score

17. Are all staff in core static code analysis strategy subjects Highly Qualified?

<– Score

18. What do you need to qualify?

<– Score

19. How do your work systems and key work processes relate to and capitalize on your core competencies?

<– Score

20. What, related to, static code analysis strategy processes does your organization outsource?

<– Score

21. Is the gap/opportunity displayed and communicated in financial terms?

<– Score

22. What other organizational variables, such as reward systems or communication systems, affect the performance of this static code analysis strategy process?

<– Score

23. How is static code analysis strategy data gathered?

<– Score

24. What are your outputs?

<– Score

25. Are static code analysis strategy changes recognized early enough to be approved through the regular process?

<– Score

26. What training and qualifications will you need?

<– Score

27. Were any designed experiments used to generate additional insight into the data analysis?

<– Score

28. What are the best opportunities for value improvement?

<– Score

29. Do you, as a leader, bounce back quickly from setbacks?

<– Score

30. Who owns what data?

<– Score

31. What are the personnel training and qualifications required?

<– Score

32. Do you have the authority to produce the output?

<– Score

33. What are the processes for audit reporting and management?

<– Score

34. A compounding model resolution with available relevant data can often provide insight towards a solution methodology; which static code analysis strategy models, tools and techniques are necessary?

<– Score

35. Who is involved with workflow mapping?

<– Score

36. How do you measure the operational performance of your key work systems and processes, including productivity, cycle time, and other appropriate measures of process effectiveness, efficiency, and innovation?

<– Score

37. What is the output?

<– Score

38. What are evaluation criteria for the output?

<– Score

39. Is the required static code analysis strategy data gathered?

<– Score

40. What are the revised rough estimates of the financial savings/opportunity for static code analysis strategy improvements?

<– Score

41. How will the static code analysis strategy data be captured?

<– Score

42. What methods do you use to gather static code analysis strategy data?

<– Score

43. What successful thing are you doing today that may be blinding you to new growth opportunities?

<– Score

44. How do you implement and manage your work processes to ensure that they meet design requirements?

<– Score

45. An organizationally feasible system request is one that considers the mission, goals and objectives of the organization, key questions are: is the static code analysis strategy solution request practical and will it solve a problem or take advantage of an opportunity to achieve company goals?

<– Score

46. How do you use static code analysis strategy data and information to support organizational decision making and innovation?

<– Score

47. What output to create?

<– Score

48. Is pre-qualification of suppliers carried out?

<– Score

49. What did the team gain from developing a sub-process map?

<– Score

50. Do your contracts/agreements contain data security obligations?

<– Score

51. Think about some of the processes you undertake within your organization, which do you own?

<– Score

52. What qualifications are necessary?

<– Score

53. How often will data be collected for measures?

<– Score

54. Are you missing static code analysis strategy opportunities?

<– Score

55. Is data and process analysis, root cause analysis and quantifying the gap/opportunity in place?

<– Score

56. What are the static code analysis strategy business drivers?

<– Score

57. Identify an operational issue in your organization, for example, could a particular task be done more quickly or more efficiently by static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

58. What were the financial benefits resulting from any ‘ground fruit or low-hanging fruit’ (quick fixes)?

<– Score

59. How was the detailed process map generated, verified, and validated?

<– Score

60. How do you identify specific static code analysis strategy investment opportunities and emerging trends?

<– Score

61. What were the crucial ‘moments of truth’ on the process map?

<– Score

62. Do your leaders quickly bounce back from setbacks?

<– Score

63. What static code analysis strategy data should be collected?

<– Score

64. Was a detailed process map created to amplify critical steps of the ‘as is’ stakeholder process?

<– Score

65. How will the change process be managed?

<– Score

66. Can you add value to the current static code analysis strategy decision-making process (largely qualitative) by incorporating uncertainty modeling (more quantitative)?

<– Score

67. When should a process be art not science?

<– Score

68. How difficult is it to qualify what static code analysis strategy ROI is?

<– Score

69. How do mission and objectives affect the static code analysis strategy processes of your organization?

<– Score

70. Are gaps between current performance and the goal performance identified?

<– Score

71. Which static code analysis strategy data should be retained?

<– Score

72. How does the organization define, manage, and improve its static code analysis strategy processes?

<– Score

73. Who gets your output?

<– Score

74. Is there a strict change management process?

<– Score

75. How will corresponding data be collected?

<– Score

76. What is the complexity of the output produced?

<– Score

77. What tools were used to narrow the list of possible causes?

<– Score

78. What static code analysis strategy metrics are outputs of the process?

<– Score

79. How has the static code analysis strategy data been gathered?

<– Score

80. Are your outputs consistent?

<– Score

81. Who will facilitate the team and process?

<– Score

82. How is the data gathered?

<– Score

83. Has data output been validated?

<– Score

84. Think about the functions involved in your static code analysis strategy project, what processes flow from these functions?

<– Score

85. Is there any way to speed up the process?

<– Score

86. How do you define collaboration and team output?

<– Score

87. What tools were used to generate the list of possible causes?

<– Score

88. Who will gather what data?

<– Score

89. Do several people in different organizational units assist with the static code analysis strategy process?

<– Score

90. What resources go in to get the desired output?

<– Score

91. Who is involved in the management review process?

<– Score

92. What are your current levels and trends in key measures or indicators of static code analysis strategy product and process performance that are important to and directly serve your customers? How do these results compare with the performance of your competitors and other organizations with similar offerings?

<– Score

93. Where is static code analysis strategy data gathered?

<– Score

94. Where is the data coming from to measure compliance?

<– Score

95. What static code analysis strategy data will be collected?

<– Score

96. What data do you need to collect?

<– Score

97. What conclusions were drawn from the team’s data collection and analysis? How did the team reach these conclusions?

<– Score

98. How do you promote understanding that opportunity for improvement is not criticism of the status quo, or the people who created the status quo?

<– Score

99. What are your current levels and trends in key static code analysis strategy measures or indicators of product and process performance that are important to and directly serve your customers?

<– Score

100. How is the way you as the leader think and process information affecting your organizational culture?

<– Score

101. What are the necessary qualifications?

<– Score

102. What is the oversight process?

<– Score

103. How much data can be collected in the given timeframe?

<– Score

104. Is there an established change management process?

<– Score

105. What are the static code analysis strategy design outputs?

<– Score

106. What are the disruptive static code analysis strategy technologies that enable your organization to radically change your business processes?

<– Score

107. What is your organizations system for selecting qualified vendors?

<– Score

108. Do quality systems drive continuous improvement?

<– Score

109. Did any value-added analysis or ‘lean thinking’ take place to identify some of the gaps shown on the ‘as is’ process map?

<– Score

110. What is the cost of poor quality as supported by the team’s analysis?

<– Score

111. Do you understand your management processes today?

<– Score

112. Where can you get qualified talent today?

<– Score

113. Were there any improvement opportunities identified from the process analysis?

<– Score

114. Record-keeping requirements flow from the records needed as inputs, outputs, controls and for transformation of a static code analysis strategy process, are the records needed as inputs to the static code analysis strategy process available?

<– Score

115. Is the static code analysis strategy process severely broken such that a re-design is necessary?

<– Score

116. Did any additional data need to be collected?

<– Score

117. How is data used for program management and improvement?

<– Score

118. What kind of crime could a potential new hire have committed that would not only not disqualify him/her from being hired by your organization, but would actually indicate that he/she might be a particularly good fit?

<– Score

119. Is the performance gap determined?

<– Score

120. What data is gathered?

<– Score

121. What is the static code analysis strategy Driver?

<– Score

122. What systems/processes must you excel at?

<– Score

123. What other jobs or tasks affect the performance of the steps in the static code analysis strategy process?

<– Score

124. Were Pareto charts (or similar) used to portray the ‘heavy hitters’ (or key sources of variation)?

<– Score

125. Should you invest in industry-recognized qualifications?

<– Score

126. How do you ensure that the static code analysis strategy opportunity is realistic?

<– Score

127. Have you defined which data is gathered how?

<– Score

128. Was a cause-and-effect diagram used to explore the different types of causes (or sources of variation)?

<– Score

129. Do staff qualifications match your project?

<– Score

130. What is the Value Stream Mapping?

<– Score

131. What is your organizations process which leads to recognition of value generation?

<– Score

132. What information qualified as important?

<– Score

133. What static code analysis strategy data should be managed?

<– Score

134. How are outputs preserved and protected?

<– Score

135. What does the data say about the performance of the stakeholder process?

<– Score

136. What are your best practices for minimizing static code analysis strategy project risk, while demonstrating incremental value and quick wins throughout the static code analysis strategy project lifecycle?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the static code analysis strategy Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #5: IMPROVE:

INTENT: Develop a practical solution. Innovate, establish and test the solution and to measure the results.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. In the past few months, what is the smallest change you have made that has had the biggest positive result? What was it about that small change that produced the large return?

<– Score

2. Who should make the static code analysis strategy decisions?

<– Score

3. Are the risks fully understood, reasonable and manageable?

<– Score

4. Does the goal represent a desired result that can be measured?

<– Score

5. What risks do you need to manage?

<– Score

6. How significant is the improvement in the eyes of the end user?

<– Score

7. How can the phases of static code analysis strategy development be identified?

<– Score

8. What is the implementation plan?

<– Score

9. Are you assessing static code analysis strategy and risk?

<– Score

10. What area needs the greatest improvement?

<– Score

11. What tools were most useful during the improve phase?

<– Score

12. How do you measure risk?

<– Score

13. Is the static code analysis strategy solution sustainable?

<– Score

14. Who do you report static code analysis strategy results to?

<– Score

15. Is risk periodically assessed?

<– Score

16. Where do the static code analysis strategy decisions reside?

<– Score

17. How risky is your organization?

<– Score

18. Are procedures documented for managing static code analysis strategy risks?

<– Score

19. Will the controls trigger any other risks?

<– Score

20. Was a static code analysis strategy charter developed?

<– Score

21. What should a proof of concept or pilot accomplish?

<– Score

22. Who are the key stakeholders for the static code analysis strategy evaluation?

<– Score

23. Who controls key decisions that will be made?

<– Score

24. Would you develop a static code analysis strategy Communication Strategy?

<– Score

25. What are the static code analysis strategy security risks?

<– Score

26. Have you achieved static code analysis strategy improvements?

<– Score

27. What assumptions are made about the solution and approach?

<– Score

28. Is the static code analysis strategy documentation thorough?

<– Score

29. Can the solution be designed and implemented within an acceptable time period?

<– Score

30. static code analysis strategy risk decisions: whose call Is It?

<– Score

31. Which of the recognised risks out of all risks can be most likely transferred?

<– Score

32. To what extent does management recognize static code analysis strategy as a tool to increase the results?

<– Score

33. Are events managed to resolution?

<– Score

34. Are the key business and technology risks being managed?

<– Score

35. How is continuous improvement applied to risk management?

<– Score

36. What is the team’s contingency plan for potential problems occurring in implementation?

<– Score

37. What do you want to improve?

<– Score

38. What tools do you use once you have decided on a static code analysis strategy strategy and more importantly how do you choose?

<– Score

39. What is the static code analysis strategy’s sustainability risk?

<– Score

40. How will you measure the results?

<– Score

41. Who are the static code analysis strategy decision-makers?

<– Score

42. How do you decide how much to remunerate an employee?

<– Score

43. How scalable is your static code analysis strategy solution?

<– Score

44. How do you define the solutions’ scope?

<– Score

45. Is supporting static code analysis strategy documentation required?

<– Score

46. What tools were used to evaluate the potential solutions?

<– Score

47. What are the concrete static code analysis strategy results?

<– Score

48. What can you do to improve?

<– Score

49. How do you manage static code analysis strategy risk?

<– Score

50. What tools were used to tap into the creativity and encourage ‘outside the box’ thinking?

<– Score

51. How will you know when its improved?

<– Score

52. How do you improve static code analysis strategy service perception, and satisfaction?

<– Score

53. Who are the static code analysis strategy decision makers?

<– Score

54. What strategies for static code analysis strategy improvement are successful?

<– Score

55. How can skill-level changes improve static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

56. How do you measure progress and evaluate training effectiveness?

<– Score

57. At what point will vulnerability assessments be performed once static code analysis strategy is put into production (e.g., ongoing Risk Management after implementation)?

<– Score

58. Who will be using the results of the measurement activities?

<– Score

59. How do you improve your likelihood of success ?

<– Score

60. What to do with the results or outcomes of measurements?

<– Score

61. Risk Identification: What are the possible risk events your organization faces in relation to static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

62. Explorations of the frontiers of static code analysis strategy will help you build influence, improve static code analysis strategy, optimize decision making, and sustain change, what is your approach?

<– Score

63. How do you link measurement and risk?

<– Score

64. If you could go back in time five years, what decision would you make differently? What is your best guess as to what decision you’re making today you might regret five years from now?

<– Score

65. What static code analysis strategy improvements can be made?

<– Score

66. What lessons, if any, from a pilot were incorporated into the design of the full-scale solution?

<– Score

67. Are risk management tasks balanced centrally and locally?

<– Score

68. Do vendor agreements bring new compliance risk ?

<– Score

69. Are the most efficient solutions problem-specific?

<– Score

70. What is the risk?

<– Score

71. How do you go about comparing static code analysis strategy approaches/solutions?

<– Score

72. Do you combine technical expertise with business knowledge and static code analysis strategy Key topics include lifecycles, development approaches, requirements and how to make a business case?

<– Score

73. What resources are required for the improvement efforts?

<– Score

74. What criteria will you use to assess your static code analysis strategy risks?

<– Score

75. Is any static code analysis strategy documentation required?

<– Score

76. Where do you need static code analysis strategy improvement?

<– Score

77. Who are the people involved in developing and implementing static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

78. How do the static code analysis strategy results compare with the performance of your competitors and other organizations with similar offerings?

<– Score

79. Do you have the optimal project management team structure?

<– Score

80. How do you measure improved static code analysis strategy service perception, and satisfaction?

<– Score

81. Do those selected for the static code analysis strategy team have a good general understanding of what static code analysis strategy is all about?

<– Score

82. How are static code analysis strategy risks managed?

<– Score

83. What is static code analysis strategy’s impact on utilizing the best solution(s)?

<– Score

84. Who manages supplier risk management in your organization?

<– Score

85. How do you deal with static code analysis strategy risk?

<– Score

86. What are the implications of the one critical static code analysis strategy decision 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years from now?

<– Score

87. How does the team improve its work?

<– Score

88. How are policy decisions made and where?

<– Score

89. What improvements have been achieved?

<– Score

90. How can you improve performance?

<– Score

91. How do you improve productivity?

<– Score

92. Why improve in the first place?

<– Score

93. How is knowledge sharing about risk management improved?

<– Score

94. What is static code analysis strategy risk?

<– Score

95. Who manages static code analysis strategy risk?

<– Score

96. Risk events: what are the things that could go wrong?

<– Score

97. Is the measure of success for static code analysis strategy understandable to a variety of people?

<– Score

98. For decision problems, how do you develop a decision statement?

<– Score

99. How does your organization evaluate strategic static code analysis strategy success?

<– Score

100. Is there a high likelihood that any recommendations will achieve their intended results?

<– Score

101. What alternative responses are available to manage risk?

<– Score

102. When you map the key players in your own work and the types/domains of relationships with them, which relationships do you find easy and which challenging, and why?

<– Score

103. How do you keep improving static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

104. Is the solution technically practical?

<– Score

105. How do you mitigate static code analysis strategy risk?

<– Score

106. Can you identify any significant risks or exposures to static code analysis strategy third- parties (vendors, service providers, alliance partners etc) that concern you?

<– Score

107. Do you need to do a usability evaluation?

<– Score

108. What are the expected static code analysis strategy results?

<– Score

109. Which static code analysis strategy solution is appropriate?

<– Score

110. Have you identified breakpoints and/or risk tolerances that will trigger broad consideration of a potential need for intervention or modification of strategy?

<– Score

111. For estimation problems, how do you develop an estimation statement?

<– Score

112. What are the affordable static code analysis strategy risks?

<– Score

113. Does a good decision guarantee a good outcome?

<– Score

114. What error proofing will be done to address some of the discrepancies observed in the ‘as is’ process?

<– Score

115. What are your current levels and trends in key measures or indicators of workforce and leader development?

<– Score

116. How will you know that a change is an improvement?

<– Score

117. Who controls the risk?

<– Score

118. What needs improvement? Why?

<– Score

119. What were the criteria for evaluating a static code analysis strategy pilot?

<– Score

120. Are risk triggers captured?

<– Score

121. How will you know that you have improved?

<– Score

122. Who will be responsible for documenting the static code analysis strategy requirements in detail?

<– Score

123. What were the underlying assumptions on the cost-benefit analysis?

<– Score

124. Do you cover the five essential competencies: Communication, Collaboration,Innovation, Adaptability, and Leadership that improve an organizations ability to leverage the new static code analysis strategy in a volatile global economy?

<– Score

125. How do you manage and improve your static code analysis strategy work systems to deliver customer value and achieve organizational success and sustainability?

<– Score

126. How can you better manage risk?

<– Score

127. Is there any other static code analysis strategy solution?

<– Score

128. Is the scope clearly documented?

<– Score

129. What current systems have to be understood and/or changed?

<– Score

130. Is static code analysis strategy documentation maintained?

<– Score

131. Can you integrate quality management and risk management?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the static code analysis strategy Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #6: CONTROL:

INTENT: Implement the practical solution. Maintain the performance and correct possible complications.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How will input, process, and output variables be checked to detect for sub-optimal conditions?

<– Score

2. What are the performance and scale of the static code analysis strategy tools?

<– Score

3. Are the static code analysis strategy standards challenging?

<– Score

4. Do you monitor the effectiveness of your static code analysis strategy activities?

<– Score

5. How do you encourage people to take control and responsibility?

<– Score

6. Will existing staff require re-training, for example, to learn new business processes?

<– Score

7. What adjustments to the strategies are needed?

<– Score

8. Act/Adjust: What Do you Need to Do Differently?

<– Score

9. What is your theory of human motivation, and how does your compensation plan fit with that view?

<– Score

10. You may have created your quality measures at a time when you lacked resources, technology wasn’t up to the required standard, or low service levels were the industry norm. Have those circumstances changed?

<– Score

11. Is a response plan established and deployed?

<– Score

12. Is there a documented and implemented monitoring plan?

<– Score

13. Does the response plan contain a definite closed loop continual improvement scheme (e.g., plan-do-check-act)?

<– Score

14. What other areas of the group might benefit from the static code analysis strategy team’s improvements, knowledge, and learning?

<– Score

15. What other systems, operations, processes, and infrastructures (hiring practices, staffing, training, incentives/rewards, metrics/dashboards/scorecards, etc.) need updates, additions, changes, or deletions in order to facilitate knowledge transfer and improvements?

<– Score

16. How will report readings be checked to effectively monitor performance?

<– Score

17. How will the process owner verify improvement in present and future sigma levels, process capabilities?

<– Score

18. How widespread is its use?

<– Score

19. Is there a static code analysis strategy Communication plan covering who needs to get what information when?

<– Score

20. Does a troubleshooting guide exist or is it needed?

<– Score

21. Has the static code analysis strategy value of standards been quantified?

<– Score

22. What do you stand for—and what are you against?

<– Score

23. Are there documented procedures?

<– Score

24. Are the planned controls in place?

<– Score

25. Have new or revised work instructions resulted?

<– Score

26. Who controls critical resources?

<– Score

27. What are the critical parameters to watch?

<– Score

28. What should you measure to verify efficiency gains?

<– Score

29. What quality tools were useful in the control phase?

<– Score

30. What is the best design framework for static code analysis strategy organization now that, in a post industrial-age if the top-down, command and control model is no longer relevant?

<– Score

31. Do you monitor the static code analysis strategy decisions made and fine tune them as they evolve?

<– Score

32. What key inputs and outputs are being measured on an ongoing basis?

<– Score

33. Against what alternative is success being measured?

<– Score

34. How do you monitor usage and cost?

<– Score

35. How will the process owner and team be able to hold the gains?

<– Score

36. Do the viable solutions scale to future needs?

<– Score

37. Will your goals reflect your program budget?

<– Score

38. How is static code analysis strategy project cost planned, managed, monitored?

<– Score

39. What static code analysis strategy standards are applicable?

<– Score

40. How do you spread information?

<– Score

41. How do you establish and deploy modified action plans if circumstances require a shift in plans and rapid execution of new plans?

<– Score

42. What are the known security controls?

<– Score

43. Does static code analysis strategy appropriately measure and monitor risk?

<– Score

44. What are your results for key measures or indicators of the accomplishment of your static code analysis strategy strategy and action plans, including building and strengthening core competencies?

<– Score

45. How do you plan on providing proper recognition and disclosure of supporting companies?

<– Score

46. What is your plan to assess your security risks?

<– Score

47. What is the control/monitoring plan?

<– Score

48. Is there a recommended audit plan for routine surveillance inspections of static code analysis strategy’s gains?

<– Score

49. Is there a standardized process?

<– Score

50. Are operating procedures consistent?

<– Score

51. How is change control managed?

<– Score

52. Who sets the static code analysis strategy standards?

<– Score

53. Does job training on the documented procedures need to be part of the process team’s education and training?

<– Score

54. What is the standard for acceptable static code analysis strategy performance?

<– Score

55. Can you adapt and adjust to changing static code analysis strategy situations?

<– Score

56. Can support from partners be adjusted?

<– Score

57. In the case of a static code analysis strategy project, the criteria for the audit derive from implementation objectives, an audit of a static code analysis strategy project involves assessing whether the recommendations outlined for implementation have been met, can you track that any static code analysis strategy project is implemented as planned, and is it working?

<– Score

58. Who is the static code analysis strategy process owner?

<– Score

59. What should the next improvement project be that is related to static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

60. How do your controls stack up?

<– Score

61. How will you measure your QA plan’s effectiveness?

<– Score

62. Do the static code analysis strategy decisions you make today help people and the planet tomorrow?

<– Score

63. What are customers monitoring?

<– Score

64. Is the static code analysis strategy test/monitoring cost justified?

<– Score

65. Is new knowledge gained imbedded in the response plan?

<– Score

66. Will any special training be provided for results interpretation?

<– Score

67. Is there a transfer of ownership and knowledge to process owner and process team tasked with the responsibilities.

<– Score

68. Is a response plan in place for when the input, process, or output measures indicate an ‘out-of-control’ condition?

<– Score

69. Does the static code analysis strategy performance meet the customer’s requirements?

<– Score

70. How will new or emerging customer needs/requirements be checked/communicated to orient the process toward meeting the new specifications and continually reducing variation?

<– Score

71. How can you best use all of your knowledge repositories to enhance learning and sharing?

<– Score

72. What is the recommended frequency of auditing?

<– Score

73. What can you control?

<– Score

74. Is reporting being used or needed?

<– Score

75. How do senior leaders actions reflect a commitment to the organizations static code analysis strategy values?

<– Score

76. How will the day-to-day responsibilities for monitoring and continual improvement be transferred from the improvement team to the process owner?

<– Score

77. Implementation Planning: is a pilot needed to test the changes before a full roll out occurs?

<– Score

78. How will static code analysis strategy decisions be made and monitored?

<– Score

79. Is knowledge gained on process shared and institutionalized?

<– Score

80. What do your reports reflect?

<– Score

81. Are the planned controls working?

<– Score

82. Are new process steps, standards, and documentation ingrained into normal operations?

<– Score

83. How do you plan for the cost of succession?

<– Score

84. Has the improved process and its steps been standardized?

<– Score

85. Are pertinent alerts monitored, analyzed and distributed to appropriate personnel?

<– Score

86. Is there documentation that will support the successful operation of the improvement?

<– Score

87. Who is going to spread your message?

<– Score

88. How likely is the current static code analysis strategy plan to come in on schedule or on budget?

<– Score

89. Is there a control plan in place for sustaining improvements (short and long-term)?

<– Score

90. Will the team be available to assist members in planning investigations?

<– Score

91. Are documented procedures clear and easy to follow for the operators?

<– Score

92. How might the group capture best practices and lessons learned so as to leverage improvements?

<– Score

93. What are the key elements of your static code analysis strategy performance improvement system, including your evaluation, organizational learning, and innovation processes?

<– Score

94. Are you measuring, monitoring and predicting static code analysis strategy activities to optimize operations and profitability, and enhancing outcomes?

<– Score

95. What do you measure to verify effectiveness gains?

<– Score

96. Is there an action plan in case of emergencies?

<– Score

97. What are you attempting to measure/monitor?

<– Score

98. Are suggested corrective/restorative actions indicated on the response plan for known causes to problems that might surface?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the static code analysis strategy Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #7: SUSTAIN:

INTENT: Retain the benefits.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How do you provide a safe environment -physically and emotionally?

<– Score

2. Are there any activities that you can take off your to do list?

<– Score

3. What new services of functionality will be implemented next with static code analysis strategy ?

<– Score

4. Is maximizing static code analysis strategy protection the same as minimizing static code analysis strategy loss?

<– Score

5. How do you determine the key elements that affect static code analysis strategy workforce satisfaction, how are these elements determined for different workforce groups and segments?

<– Score

6. Do you have the right people on the bus?

<– Score

7. Are you relevant? Will you be relevant five years from now? Ten?

<– Score

8. What is effective static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

9. Do you have enough freaky customers in your portfolio pushing you to the limit day in and day out?

<– Score

10. Whose voice (department, ethnic group, women, older workers, etc) might you have missed hearing from in your company, and how might you amplify this voice to create positive momentum for your business?

<– Score

11. Is your strategy driving your strategy? Or is the way in which you allocate resources driving your strategy?

<– Score

12. What is your formula for success in static code analysis strategy ?

<– Score

13. What counts that you are not counting?

<– Score

14. Operational - will it work?

<– Score

15. How much contingency will be available in the budget?

<– Score

16. How will you know that the static code analysis strategy project has been successful?

<– Score

17. Are you changing as fast as the world around you?

<– Score

18. Were lessons learned captured and communicated?

<– Score

19. What would you recommend your friend do if he/she were facing this dilemma?

<– Score

20. If you were responsible for initiating and implementing major changes in your organization, what steps might you take to ensure acceptance of those changes?

<– Score

21. How do you track customer value, profitability or financial return, organizational success, and sustainability?

<– Score

22. Has implementation been effective in reaching specified objectives so far?

<– Score

23. Do you feel that more should be done in the static code analysis strategy area?

<– Score

24. What is something you believe that nearly no one agrees with you on?

<– Score

25. What one word do you want to own in the minds of your customers, employees, and partners?

<– Score

26. What are you challenging?

<– Score

27. What is the big static code analysis strategy idea?

<– Score

28. What will be the consequences to the stakeholder (financial, reputation etc) if static code analysis strategy does not go ahead or fails to deliver the objectives?

<– Score

29. What are the rules and assumptions your industry operates under? What if the opposite were true?

<– Score

30. If your company went out of business tomorrow, would anyone who doesn’t get a paycheck here care?

<– Score

31. What information is critical to your organization that your executives are ignoring?

<– Score

32. Who is responsible for errors?

<– Score

33. What static code analysis strategy skills are most important?

<– Score

34. Is your basic point _____ or _____?

<– Score

35. How do you maintain static code analysis strategy’s Integrity?

<– Score

36. How do you cross-sell and up-sell your static code analysis strategy success?

<– Score

37. Who are the key stakeholders?

<– Score

38. Which models, tools and techniques are necessary?

<– Score

39. What knowledge, skills and characteristics mark a good static code analysis strategy project manager?

<– Score

40. Is static code analysis strategy dependent on the successful delivery of a current project?

<– Score

41. How do you govern and fulfill your societal responsibilities?

<– Score

42. Will there be any necessary staff changes (redundancies or new hires)?

<– Score

43. What is the purpose of static code analysis strategy in relation to the mission?

<– Score

44. How can you negotiate static code analysis strategy successfully with a stubborn boss, an irate client, or a deceitful coworker?

<– Score

45. Who will determine interim and final deadlines?

<– Score

46. If you find that you havent accomplished one of the goals for one of the steps of the static code analysis strategy strategy, what will you do to fix it?

<– Score

47. Are you using a design thinking approach and integrating Innovation, static code analysis strategy Experience, and Brand Value?

<– Score

48. What is the overall business strategy?

<– Score

49. What is the source of the strategies for static code analysis strategy strengthening and reform?

<– Score

50. Why not do static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

51. Who have you, as a company, historically been when you’ve been at your best?

<– Score

52. Who uses your product in ways you never expected?

<– Score

53. How can you become more high-tech but still be high touch?

<– Score

54. Are the criteria for selecting recommendations stated?

<– Score

55. Can you do all this work?

<– Score

56. Are the assumptions believable and achievable?

<– Score

57. Marketing budgets are tighter, consumers are more skeptical, and social media has changed forever the way we talk about static code analysis strategy, how do you gain traction?

<– Score

58. Who is on the team?

<– Score

59. What is the estimated value of the project?

<– Score

60. What are the business goals static code analysis strategy is aiming to achieve?

<– Score

61. What are the success criteria that will indicate that static code analysis strategy objectives have been met and the benefits delivered?

<– Score

62. How can you incorporate support to ensure safe and effective use of static code analysis strategy into the services that you provide?

<– Score

63. Which static code analysis strategy goals are the most important?

<– Score

64. Which individuals, teams or departments will be involved in static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

65. How do you listen to customers to obtain actionable information?

<– Score

66. What have you done to protect your business from competitive encroachment?

<– Score

67. What potential megatrends could make your business model obsolete?

<– Score

68. Who else should you help?

<– Score

69. How do you foster the skills, knowledge, talents, attributes, and characteristics you want to have?

<– Score

70. What is the craziest thing you can do?

<– Score

71. What are the potential basics of static code analysis strategy fraud?

<– Score

72. What is the kind of project structure that would be appropriate for your static code analysis strategy project, should it be formal and complex, or can it be less formal and relatively simple?

<– Score

73. Can you break it down?

<– Score

74. What would have to be true for the option on the table to be the best possible choice?

<– Score

75. Did your employees make progress today?

<– Score

76. What stupid rule would you most like to kill?

<– Score

77. Instead of going to current contacts for new ideas, what if you reconnected with dormant contacts—the people you used to know? If you were going reactivate a dormant tie, who would it be?

<– Score

78. Do you have past static code analysis strategy successes?

<– Score

79. In the past year, what have you done (or could you have done) to increase the accurate perception of your company/brand as ethical and honest?

<– Score

80. Are you / should you be revolutionary or evolutionary?

<– Score

81. How do you transition from the baseline to the target?

<– Score

82. What is the range of capabilities?

<– Score

83. How are you doing compared to your industry?

<– Score

84. If you weren’t already in this business, would you enter it today? And if not, what are you going to do about it?

<– Score

85. At what moment would you think; Will I get fired?

<– Score

86. Do you say no to customers for no reason?

<– Score

87. What could happen if you do not do it?

<– Score

88. What is your competitive advantage?

<– Score

89. Whom among your colleagues do you trust, and for what?

<– Score

90. What must you excel at?

<– Score

91. What is an unauthorized commitment?

<– Score

92. What are the usability implications of static code analysis strategy actions?

<– Score

93. What are current static code analysis strategy paradigms?

<– Score

94. What unique value proposition (UVP) do you offer?

<– Score

95. What is the funding source for this project?

<– Score

96. If you had to leave your organization for a year and the only communication you could have with employees/colleagues was a single paragraph, what would you write?

<– Score

97. How do you go about securing static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

98. What is it like to work for you?

<– Score

99. What goals did you miss?

<– Score

100. How is implementation research currently incorporated into each of your goals?

<– Score

101. Think of your static code analysis strategy project, what are the main functions?

<– Score

102. If you had to rebuild your organization without any traditional competitive advantages (i.e., no killer technology, promising research, innovative product/service delivery model, etcetera), how would your people have to approach their work and collaborate together in order to create the necessary conditions for success?

<– Score

103. How likely is it that a customer would recommend your company to a friend or colleague?

<– Score

104. Is there any existing static code analysis strategy governance structure?

<– Score

105. Can you maintain your growth without detracting from the factors that have contributed to your success?

<– Score

106. How do you engage the workforce, in addition to satisfying them?

<– Score

107. How do you make it meaningful in connecting static code analysis strategy with what users do day-to-day?

<– Score

108. What projects are going on in the organization today, and what resources are those projects using from the resource pools?

<– Score

109. What is your BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement)?

<– Score

110. If no one would ever find out about your accomplishments, how would you lead differently?

<– Score

111. What business benefits will static code analysis strategy goals deliver if achieved?

<– Score

112. Why should you adopt a static code analysis strategy framework?

<– Score

113. How important is static code analysis strategy to the user organizations mission?

<– Score

114. Who is responsible for ensuring appropriate resources (time, people and money) are allocated to static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

115. What are specific static code analysis strategy rules to follow?

<– Score

116. Are you satisfied with your current role? If not, what is missing from it?

<– Score

117. What role does communication play in the success or failure of a static code analysis strategy project?

<– Score

118. In a project to restructure static code analysis strategy outcomes, which stakeholders would you involve?

<– Score

119. What may be the consequences for the performance of an organization if all stakeholders are not consulted regarding static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

120. What is your static code analysis strategy strategy?

<– Score

121. What trouble can you get into?

<– Score

122. If your customer were your grandmother, would you tell her to buy what you’re selling?

<– Score

123. If you got fired and a new hire took your place, what would she do different?

<– Score

124. How do you manage static code analysis strategy Knowledge Management (KM)?

<– Score

125. Who is responsible for static code analysis strategy?

<– Score

126. Are new benefits received and understood?

<– Score

127. Do you think you know, or do you know you know ?

<– Score

128. Are assumptions made in static code analysis strategy stated explicitly?

<– Score

129. Who are your customers?

<– Score

130. What does your signature ensure?

<– Score

131. In retrospect, of the projects that you pulled the plug on, what percent do you wish had been allowed to keep going, and what percent do you wish had ended earlier?

<– Score

132. How do you accomplish your long range static code analysis strategy goals?

<– Score

133. What are your personal philosophies regarding static code analysis strategy and how do they influence your work?

<– Score

134. Is the impact that static code analysis strategy has shown?

<– Score

135. How do you deal with static code analysis strategy changes?

<– Score

136. What are your most important goals for the strategic static code analysis strategy objectives?

<– Score

137. Is there a work around that you can use?

<– Score

138. What happens when a new employee joins the organization?

<– Score

139. What is your question? Why?

<– Score

140. How do customers see your organization?

<– Score

141. What relationships among static code analysis strategy trends do you perceive?

<– Score

142. Why will customers want to buy your organizations products/services?

<– Score

143. What was the last experiment you ran?

<– Score

144. Have benefits been optimized with all key stakeholders?

<– Score

145. Is static code analysis strategy realistic, or are you setting yourself up for failure?

<– Score

146. If you do not follow, then how to lead?

<– Score

147. What static code analysis strategy modifications can you make work for you?

<– Score

148. Are you maintaining a past–present–future perspective throughout the static code analysis strategy discussion?

<– Score

149. How do you ensure that implementations of static code analysis strategy products are done in a way that ensures safety?

<– Score

150. What are the key enablers to make this static code analysis strategy move?

<– Score

151. What are the gaps in your knowledge and experience?

<– Score

152. Is a static code analysis strategy breakthrough on the horizon?

<– Score

153. Who will be responsible for deciding whether static code analysis strategy goes ahead or not after the initial investigations?

<– Score

154. What management system can you use to leverage the static code analysis strategy experience, ideas, and concerns of the people closest to the work to be done?

<– Score

155. Have new benefits been realized?

<– Score

156. Is it economical; do you have the time and money?

<– Score

157. How much does static code analysis strategy help?

<– Score

158. How do you lead with static code analysis strategy in mind?

<– Score

159. Are you making progress, and are you making progress as static code analysis strategy leaders?

<– Score

160. How will you motivate the stakeholders with the least vested interest?

<– Score

161. Would you rather sell to knowledgeable and informed customers or to uninformed customers?

<– Score

162. How can you become the company that would put you out of business?

<– Score

163. What should you stop doing?

<– Score

164. When information truly is ubiquitous, when reach and connectivity are completely global, when computing resources are infinite, and when a whole new set of impossibilities are not only possible, but happening, what will that do to your business?

<– Score

165. Are your responses positive or negative?

<– Score

166. Is there any reason to believe the opposite of my current belief?

<– Score

167. What did you miss in the interview for the worst hire you ever made?

<– Score

168. What are the short and long-term static code analysis strategy goals?

<– Score

169. How do you know if you are successful?

<– Score

170. Who do you think the world wants your organization to be?

<– Score

171. What is a feasible sequencing of reform initiatives over time?

<– Score

172. How do you keep records, of what?

<– Score

173. What threat is static code analysis strategy addressing?

<– Score

174. How does static code analysis strategy integrate with other stakeholder initiatives?

<– Score

175. What you are going to do to affect the numbers?

<– Score

176. Who will provide the final approval of static code analysis strategy deliverables?

<– Score

177. Who, on the executive team or the board, has spoken to a customer recently?

<– Score

178. What happens at your organization when people fail?

<– Score

179. Do you know who is a friend or a foe?

<– Score

180. Who are four people whose careers you have enhanced?

<– Score

181. Who do you want your customers to become?

<– Score

182. Ask yourself: how would you do this work if you only had one staff member to do it?

<– Score

183. Why is it important to have senior management support for a static code analysis strategy project?

<– Score

184. How do senior leaders deploy your organizations vision and values through your leadership system, to the workforce, to key suppliers and partners, and to customers and other stakeholders, as appropriate?

<– Score

185. Do you see more potential in people than they do in themselves?

<– Score

186. What are the essentials of internal static code analysis strategy management?

<– Score

187. What do we do when new problems arise?

<– Score

188. Do you have the right capabilities and capacities?

<– Score

189. Can the schedule be done in the given time?

<– Score

190. What have been your experiences in defining long range static code analysis strategy goals?

<– Score

191. Are you paying enough attention to the partners your company depends on to succeed?

<– Score

192. Who will manage the integration of tools?

<– Score

193. Political -is anyone trying to undermine this project?

<– Score

194. Which functions and people interact with the supplier and or customer?

<– Score

195. Do you think static code analysis strategy accomplishes the goals you expect it to accomplish?

<– Score

196. What is the overall talent health of your organization as a whole at senior levels, and for each organization reporting to a member of the Senior Leadership Team?

<– Score

197. Is a static code analysis strategy team work effort in place?

<– Score

198. Do you know what you are doing? And who do you call if you don’t?

<– Score

199. What are strategies for increasing support and reducing opposition?

<– Score

200. How do you proactively clarify deliverables and static code analysis strategy quality expectations?

<– Score

201. What are the barriers to increased static code analysis strategy production?

<– Score

202. Is the static code analysis strategy organization completing tasks effectively and efficiently?

<– Score

203. How will you insure seamless interoperability of static code analysis strategy moving forward?

<– Score

204. Why do and why don’t your customers like your organization?

<– Score

205. How do you assess the static code analysis strategy pitfalls that are inherent in implementing it?

<– Score

206. To whom do you add value?

<– Score

207. What are you trying to prove to yourself, and how might it be hijacking your life and business success?

<– Score

208. How long will it take to change?

<– Score

209. Who do we want your customers to become?

<– Score

210. How do you keep the momentum going?

<– Score

211. What are the top 3 things at the forefront of your static code analysis strategy agendas for the next 3 years?

<– Score

212. Who is the main stakeholder, with ultimate responsibility for driving static code analysis strategy forward?

<– Score

213. How do you set static code analysis strategy stretch targets and how do you get people to not only participate in setting these stretch targets but also that they strive to achieve these?

<– Score

214. What are the challenges?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the static code analysis strategy Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

Static Code Analysis Strategy and Managing Projects, Criteria for Project Managers:

1.0 Initiating Process Group: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1. What were things that you did very well and want to do the same again on the next Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

2. Information sharing?

3. Contingency planning. if a risk event occurs, what will you do?

4. When must it be done?

5. Did the Static Code Analysis Strategy project team have the right skills?

6. What areas were overlooked on this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

7. Are you just doing busywork to pass the time?

8. Who are the Static Code Analysis Strategy project stakeholders?

9. How to control and approve each phase?

10. What were the challenges that you encountered during the execution of a previous Static Code Analysis Strategy project that you would not want to repeat?

11. What do they need to know about the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

12. In which Static Code Analysis Strategy project management process group is the detailed Static Code Analysis Strategy project budget created?

13. Were resources available as planned?

14. At which cmmi level are software processes documented, standardized, and integrated into a standard to-be practiced process for your organization?

15. What must be done?

16. For technology Static Code Analysis Strategy projects only: Are all production support stakeholders (Business unit, technical support, & user) prepared for implementation with appropriate contingency plans?

17. Were sponsors and decision makers available when needed outside regularly scheduled meetings?

18. Although the Static Code Analysis Strategy project manager does not directly manage procurement and contracting activities, who does manage procurement and contracting activities in your organization then if not the PM?

19. At which stage, in a typical Static Code Analysis Strategy project do stake holders have maximum influence?

20. What will be the pressing issues of tomorrow?

1.1 Project Charter: Static Code Analysis Strategy

21. Must Have?

22. What date will the task finish?

23. Who ise input and support will this Static Code Analysis Strategy project require?

24. Who will take notes, document decisions?

25. Who manages integration?

26. Are you building in-house ?

27. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project need to consider any special capacity or capability issues?

28. Run it as as a startup?

29. How much?

30. Success determination factors: how will the success of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project be determined from the customers perspective?

31. Where and how does the team fit within your organization structure?

32. Why do you need to manage scope?

33. Review the general mission What system will be affected by the improvement efforts?

34. What outcome, in measureable terms, are you hoping to accomplish?

35. What barriers do you predict to your success?

36. What ideas do you have for initial tests of change (PDSA cycles)?

37. Static Code Analysis Strategy project deliverables: what is the Static Code Analysis Strategy project going to produce?

38. Why Outsource?

39. What is the justification?

40. Why do you manage integration?

1.2 Stakeholder Register: Static Code Analysis Strategy

41. How big is the gap?

42. What & Why?

43. How should employers make voices heard?

44. Who wants to talk about Security?

45. Who is managing stakeholder engagement?

46. How much influence do they have on the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

47. What is the power of the stakeholder?

48. What opportunities exist to provide communications?

49. What are the major Static Code Analysis Strategy project milestones requiring communications or providing communications opportunities?

50. How will reports be created?

51. Is your organization ready for change?

52. Who are the stakeholders?

1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix: Static Code Analysis Strategy

53. Marketing - reach, distribution, awareness?

54. What is the issue at stake?

55. New USPs?

56. Timescales, deadlines and pressures?

57. Sustaining internal capabilities?

58. Identify the stakeholders levels most frequently used –or at least sought– in your Static Code Analysis Strategy projects and for which purpose?

59. Political effects?

60. Vulnerable groups; who are the vulnerable groups that might be affected by the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

61. Who is most interested in information about the topic and/or has previously initiated interest?

62. Guiding question: who shall you involve in the making of the stakeholder map?

63. How are you predicting what future (work)loads will be?

64. Partnership opportunities/synergies?

65. Processes and systems, etc?

66. What advantages do your organizations stakeholders have?

67. Why involve the stakeholder?

68. Information and research?

69. What can the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects outcome be used for?

70. What is social & public accountability ?

71. Tactics: eg, surprise, major contracts?

72. How will the stakeholder directly benefit from the Static Code Analysis Strategy project and how will this affect the stakeholders motivation?

2.0 Planning Process Group: Static Code Analysis Strategy

73. What makes your Static Code Analysis Strategy project successful?

74. What type of estimation method are you using?

75. How are the principles of aid effectiveness (ownership, alignment, management for development results and mutual responsibility) being applied in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

76. First of all, should any action be taken?

77. How can you tell when you are done?

78. To what extent have the target population and participants made the activities own, taking an active role in it?

79. What do you need to do?

80. What is a Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)?

81. Are the necessary foundations in place to ensure the sustainability of the results of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

82. Does the program have follow-up mechanisms (to verify the quality of the products, punctuality of delivery, etc.) to measure progress in the achievement of the envisaged results?

83. How will you know you did it?

84. How can you make your needs known?

85. How many days can task X be late in starting without affecting the Static Code Analysis Strategy project completion date?

86. Who are the Static Code Analysis Strategy project stakeholders?

87. Do the partners have sufficient financial capacity to keep up the benefits produced by the programme?

88. What types of differentiated effects are resulting from the Static Code Analysis Strategy project and to what extent?

89. Did the program design/ implementation strategy adequately address the planning stage necessary to set up structures, hire staff etc.?

90. Did you read it correctly?

91. To what extent has a PMO contributed to raising the quality of the design of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

92. Does it make any difference if you are successful?

2.1 Project Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

93. What if, for example, the positive direction and vision of your organization causes expected trends to change resulting in greater need than expected?

94. Are there non-structural buyout or relocation recommendations?

95. What went right?

96. Was the peer (technical) review of the cost estimates duly coordinated with the cost estimate center of expertise and addressed in the review documentation and certification?

97. Who is the Static Code Analysis Strategy project Manager?

98. Are the proposed Static Code Analysis Strategy project purposes different than a previously authorized Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

99. What goes into your Static Code Analysis Strategy project Charter?

100. How do you organize the costs in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project management plan?

101. What does management expect of PMs?

102. What went wrong?

103. Are alternatives safe, functional, constructible, economical, reasonable and sustainable?

104. Does the implementation plan have an appropriate division of responsibilities?

105. Is mitigation authorized or recommended?

106. What are the constraints?

107. How well are you able to manage your risk?

108. What are the training needs?

109. Are there any client staffing expectations?

110. How do you manage time?

111. What would you do differently what did not work?

2.2 Scope Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

112. What happens if scope changes?

113. Have Static Code Analysis Strategy project team accountabilities & responsibilities been clearly defined?

114. Was the scope definition used in task sequencing?

115. Would the Static Code Analysis Strategy project cost sharing involve reimbursement to the sponsor?

116. Are all key components of a Quality Assurance Plan present?

117. Personnel with expertise?

118. Organizational unit (e.g., department, team, or person) who will accept responsibility for satisfactory completion of the item?

119. Is quality monitored from the perspective of the customers needs and expectations?

120. Are non-critical path items updated and agreed upon with the teams?

121. Are enough systems & user personnel assigned to the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

122. How do you handle uncertainty or conflict?

123. Is current scope of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project substantially different than that originally defined?

124. What are the risks that could significantly affect procuring consultant staff for the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

125. Does the title convey to the reader the essence of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

126. Describe the process for rejecting the Static Code Analysis Strategy project deliverables. What happens to rejected deliverables?

127. Are calculations and results of analyzes essentially correct?

128. Without-plan conditions?

129. Describe the manner in which Static Code Analysis Strategy project deliverables will be formally presented and accepted. Will they be presented at the end of each phase?

130. Are decisions captured in a decisions log?

131. What weaknesses do you have?

2.3 Requirements Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

132. How will requirements be managed?

133. What cost metrics will be used?

134. Business analysis scope?

135. Are actual resources expenditures versus planned expenditures acceptable?

136. Will you document changes to requirements?

137. Are all the stakeholders ready for the transition into the user community?

138. Did you avoid subjective, flowery or non-specific statements?

139. When and how will a requirements baseline be established in this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

140. How knowledgeable is the team in the proposed application area?

141. Who is responsible for quantifying the Static Code Analysis Strategy project requirements?

142. Do you have an agreed upon process for alerting the Static Code Analysis Strategy project Manager if a request for change in requirements leads to a product scope change?

143. Is the system software (non-operating system) new to the IT Static Code Analysis Strategy project team?

144. Is the change control process documented?

145. What information regarding the Static Code Analysis Strategy project requirements will be reported?

146. What are you trying to do?

147. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project have a Change Control process?

148. Have stakeholders been instructed in the Change Control process?

149. Who will finally present the work or product(s) for acceptance?

150. Is the user satisfied?

2.4 Requirements Documentation: Static Code Analysis Strategy

151. What happens when requirements are wrong?

152. Do technical resources exist?

153. What variations exist for a process?

154. What is effective documentation?

155. Basic work/business process; high-level, what is being touched?

156. Are there legal issues?

157. How linear / iterative is your Requirements Gathering process (or will it be)?

158. How do you know when a Requirement is accurate enough?

159. What are the attributes of a customer?

160. What are current process problems?

161. Are there any requirements conflicts?

162. How much testing do you need to do to prove that your system is safe?

163. Who is interacting with the system?

164. Who is involved?

165. What is the risk associated with the technology?

166. What can tools do for us?

167. Can the requirement be changed without a large impact on other requirements?

168. What is a show stopper in the requirements?

169. How will they be documented / shared?

170. What if the system wasn t implemented?

2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix: Static Code Analysis Strategy

171. Describe the process for approving requirements so they can be added to the traceability matrix and Static Code Analysis Strategy project work can be performed. Will the Static Code Analysis Strategy project requirements become approved in writing?

172. What is the WBS?

173. What are the chronologies, contingencies, consequences, criteria?

174. Why do you manage scope?

175. How small is small enough?

176. How do you manage scope?

177. What percentage of Static Code Analysis Strategy projects are producing traceability matrices between requirements and other work products?

178. Why use a WBS?

179. Is there a requirements traceability process in place?

180. Will you use a Requirements Traceability Matrix?

181. How will it affect the stakeholders personally in career?

182. Do you have a clear understanding of all subcontracts in place?

2.6 Project Scope Statement: Static Code Analysis Strategy

183. Is an issue management process documented and filed?

184. Is this process communicated to the customer and team members?

185. Are the meetings set up to have assigned note takers that will add action/issues to the issue list?

186. What are the possible consequences should a risk come to occur?

187. How will you verify the accuracy of the work of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project, and what constitutes acceptance of the deliverables?

188. Is the plan for Static Code Analysis Strategy project resources adequate?

189. Relevant - ask yourself can you get there; why are you doing this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

190. Identify how your team and you will create the Static Code Analysis Strategy project scope statement and the work breakdown structure (WBS). Document how you will create the Static Code Analysis Strategy project scope statement and WBS, and make sure you answer the following questions: In defining Static Code Analysis Strategy project scope and the WBS, will you and your Static Code Analysis Strategy project team be using methods defined by your organization, methods defined by the Static Code Analysis Strategy project management office (PMO), or other methods?

191. Are there issues that could affect the existing requirements for the result, service, or product if the scope changes?

192. Have the configuration management functions been assigned?

193. Static Code Analysis Strategy project lead, team lead, solution architect?

194. Is the plan under configuration management?

195. Does the scope statement still need some clarity?

196. Who will you recommend approve the change, and when do you recommend the change reviews occur?

197. Is the Static Code Analysis Strategy project organization documented and on file?

198. What is change?

199. Has everyone approved the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects scope statement?

200. Have you been able to thoroughly document the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects assumptions and constraints?

201. Will this process be communicated to the customer and Static Code Analysis Strategy project team?

2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log: Static Code Analysis Strategy

202. Does the document/deliverable meet all requirements (for example, statement of work) specific to this deliverable?

203. What worked well?

204. Have the scope, objectives, costs, benefits and impacts been communicated to all involved and/or impacted stakeholders and work groups?

205. Is there adequate stakeholder participation for the vetting of requirements definition, changes and management?

206. Does the document/deliverable meet general requirements (for example, statement of work) for all deliverables?

207. Are funding and staffing resource estimates sufficiently detailed and documented for use in planning and tracking the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

208. Was the document/deliverable developed per the appropriate or required standards (for example, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers standards)?

209. Can you perform this task or activity in a more effective manner?

210. Is the amount of effort justified by the anticipated value of forming a new process?

211. Does a documented Static Code Analysis Strategy project organizational policy & plan (i.e. governance model) exist?

212. Is this process still needed?

213. Is there documentation of system capability requirements, data requirements, environment requirements, security requirements, and computer and hardware requirements?

214. Does the system design reflect the requirements?

215. No superfluous information or marketing narrative?

216. Are formal code reviews conducted?

217. Were the system requirements formally reviewed prior to initiating the design phase?

218. How many Static Code Analysis Strategy project staff does this specific process affect?

219. Are best practices and metrics employed to identify issues, progress, performance, etc.?

220. Are requirements management tracking tools and procedures in place?

2.8 Work Breakdown Structure: Static Code Analysis Strategy

221. Is it a change in scope?

222. Why would you develop a Work Breakdown Structure?

223. Who has to do it?

224. Can you make it?

225. Is the work breakdown structure (wbs) defined and is the scope of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project clear with assigned deliverable owners?

226. Do you need another level?

227. How many levels?

228. How will you and your Static Code Analysis Strategy project team define the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects scope and work breakdown structure?

229. What is the probability that the Static Code Analysis Strategy project duration will exceed xx weeks?

230. Where does it take place?

231. How much detail?

232. When would you develop a Work Breakdown Structure?

233. What is the probability of completing the Static Code Analysis Strategy project in less that xx days?

234. When does it have to be done?

235. How big is a work-package?

236. When do you stop?

2.9 WBS Dictionary: Static Code Analysis Strategy

237. Are management actions taken to reduce indirect costs when there are significant adverse variances?

238. Are authorized changes being incorporated in a timely manner?

239. Detailed schedules which support control account and work package start and completion dates/events?

240. The anticipated business volume?

241. Are budgets or values assigned to work packages and planning packages in terms of dollars, hours, or other measurable units?

242. Are records maintained to show full accountability for all material purchased for the contract, including the residual inventory?

243. Are indirect costs charged to the appropriate indirect pools and incurring organization?

244. Intermediate schedules, as required, which provide a logical sequence from the master schedule to the control account level?

245. Are retroactive changes to BCWS and BCWP prohibited except for correction of errors or for normal accounting adjustments?

246. What should you drop in order to add something new?

247. Are direct or indirect cost adjustments being accomplished according to accounting procedures acceptable to us?

248. Are meaningful indicators identified for use in measuring the status of cost and schedule performance?

249. Can the contractor substantiate work package and planning package budgets?

250. Are current budgets resulting from changes to the authorized work and/or internal replanning, reconcilable to original budgets for specified reporting items?

251. Are overhead costs budgets established on a basis consistent with anticipated direct business base?

252. Are Static Code Analysis Strategy projected overhead costs in each pool and the associated direct costs used as the basis for establishing interim rates for allocating overhead to contracts?

253. What size should a work package be?

254. Are work packages assigned to performing organizations?

255. Should you include sub-activities?

2.10 Schedule Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

256. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project have a Quality Culture?

257. Has a resource management plan been created?

258. Have all documents been archived in a Static Code Analysis Strategy project repository for each release?

259. Is it standard practice to formally commit stakeholders to the Static Code Analysis Strategy project via agreements?

260. Are target dates established for each milestone deliverable?

261. Has the ims content been baselined and is it adequately controlled?

262. What strengths do you have?

263. Are the processes for schedule assessment and analysis defined?

264. Goal: is the schedule feasible and at what cost?

265. Are right task and resource calendars used in the IMS?

266. Does the time Static Code Analysis Strategy projection include an amount for contingencies (time reserves)?

267. Is there any form of automated support for Issues Management?

268. Have Static Code Analysis Strategy project team accountabilities & responsibilities been clearly defined?

269. Were the budget estimates reasonable?

270. Are all payments made according to the contract(s)?

271. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project have quality set of schedule BOEs?

272. Does the schedule have reasonable float?

2.11 Activity List: Static Code Analysis Strategy

273. When will the work be performed?

274. How detailed should a Static Code Analysis Strategy project get?

275. How difficult will it be to do specific activities on this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

276. How do you determine the late start (LS) for each activity?

277. Is infrastructure setup part of your Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

278. Can you determine the activity that must finish, before this activity can start?

279. When do the individual activities need to start and finish?

280. What will be performed?

281. What is the LF and LS for each activity?

282. How will it be performed?

283. What is the probability the Static Code Analysis Strategy project can be completed in xx weeks?

284. What is the total time required to complete the Static Code Analysis Strategy project if no delays occur?

285. The wbs is developed as part of a joint planning session. and how do you know that youhave done this right?

286. What did not go as well?

287. How should ongoing costs be monitored to try to keep the Static Code Analysis Strategy project within budget?

288. What are you counting on?

289. How can the Static Code Analysis Strategy project be displayed graphically to better visualize the activities?

2.12 Activity Attributes: Static Code Analysis Strategy

290. Which method produces the more accurate cost assignment?

291. Have you identified the Activity Leveling Priority code value on each activity?

292. Is there a trend during the year?

293. What is missing?

294. Where else does it apply?

295. Are the required resources available?

296. How many days do you need to complete the work scope with a limit of X number of resources?

297. Were there other ways you could have organized the data to achieve similar results?

298. Can more resources be added?

299. Is there anything planned that does not need to be here?

300. What conclusions/generalizations can you draw from this?

301. Would you consider either of corresponding activities an outlier?

302. Resource is assigned to?

303. What is your organizations history in doing similar activities?

304. Are the required resources available or need to be acquired?

305. How difficult will it be to complete specific activities on this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

306. Does your organization of the data change its meaning?

2.13 Milestone List: Static Code Analysis Strategy

307. Legislative effects?

308. Reliability of data, plan predictability?

309. What is the market for your technology, product or service?

310. When will the Static Code Analysis Strategy project be complete?

311. How will the milestone be verified?

312. Can you derive how soon can the whole Static Code Analysis Strategy project finish?

313. What are your competitors vulnerabilities?

314. Describe the industry you are in and the market growth opportunities. What is the market for your technology, product or service?

315. Which path is the critical path?

316. How difficult will it be to do specific activities on this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

317. Level of the Innovation?

318. How soon can the activity start?

319. What background experience, skills, and strengths does the team bring to your organization?

320. Milestone pages should display the UserID of the person who added the milestone. Does a report or query exist that provides this audit information?

321. What specific improvements did you make to the Static Code Analysis Strategy project proposal since the previous time?

2.14 Network Diagram: Static Code Analysis Strategy

322. If x is long, what would be the completion time if you break x into two parallel parts of y weeks and z weeks?

323. How difficult will it be to do specific activities on this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

324. What activities must occur simultaneously with this activity?

325. What job or jobs precede it?

326. If a current contract exists, can you provide the vendor name, contract start, and contract expiration date?

327. What job or jobs could run concurrently?

328. What is the lowest cost to complete this Static Code Analysis Strategy project in xx weeks?

329. Why must you schedule milestones, such as reviews, throughout the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

330. If the Static Code Analysis Strategy project network diagram cannot change and you have extra personnel resources, what is the BEST thing to do?

331. Exercise: what is the probability that the Static Code Analysis Strategy project duration will exceed xx weeks?

332. Which type of network diagram allows you to depict four types of dependencies?

333. Are you on time?

334. Are the gantt chart and/or network diagram updated periodically and used to assess the overall Static Code Analysis Strategy project timetable?

335. Will crashing x weeks return more in benefits than it costs?

336. Where do schedules come from?

337. Can you calculate the confidence level?

338. What are the Major Administrative Issues?

339. What must be completed before an activity can be started?

2.15 Activity Resource Requirements: Static Code Analysis Strategy

340. How do you handle petty cash?

341. Are there unresolved issues that need to be addressed?

342. How many signatures do you require on a check and does this match what is in your policy and procedures?

343. Why do you do that?

344. Organizational Applicability?

345. Other support in specific areas?

346. What are constraints that you might find during the Human Resource Planning process?

347. When does monitoring begin?

348. Anything else?

349. Time for overtime?

350. Which logical relationship does the PDM use most often?

351. What is the Work Plan Standard?

352. Do you use tools like decomposition and rolling-wave planning to produce the activity list and other outputs?

2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure: Static Code Analysis Strategy

353. What is Static Code Analysis Strategy project communication management?

354. Why do you do it?

355. The list could probably go on, but, the thing that you would most like to know is, How long & How much?

356. Who needs what information?

357. Who is allowed to see what data about which resources?

358. How can this help you with team building?

359. Why time management?

360. What defines a successful Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

361. Changes based on input from stakeholders?

362. When do they need the information?

363. What is the primary purpose of the human resource plan?

364. What is the purpose of assigning and documenting responsibility?

365. What are the requirements for resource data?

366. What is the number one predictor of a groups productivity?

367. What defines a successful Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

368. What is the difference between % Complete and % work?

369. Why is this important?

2.17 Activity Duration Estimates: Static Code Analysis Strategy

370. Are contractor costs, schedule and technical performance monitored throughout the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

371. Are reward and recognition systems defined to promote or reinforce desired behavior?

372. Does a process exist to determine which risk events to accept and which events to disregard?

373. Under corresponding circumstances what would be the best thing to do?

374. Consider the common sources of risk on information technology Static Code Analysis Strategy projects and suggestions for managing them. Which suggestions do you find most useful?

375. What are the largest companies that provide information technology outsourcing services?

376. Are the causes of all variances identified?

377. Describe a Static Code Analysis Strategy project that suffered from scope creep. Could it have been avoided?

378. How many different communications channels does a Static Code Analysis Strategy project team with six people have?

379. What is involved in the solicitation process?

380. Are risks that are likely to affect the Static Code Analysis Strategy project identified and documented?

381. What are the options you found to help people prepare for the exam?

382. Does a process exist to identify which qualified resources may be attainable?

383. Is the work performed reviewed against contractual objectives?

384. Is corrective action taken to bring Static Code Analysis Strategy project performance into line with the Static Code Analysis Strategy project plan?

385. Are Static Code Analysis Strategy project management tools and techniques consistently applied throughout all Static Code Analysis Strategy projects?

386. What do corresponding sources say about Static Code Analysis Strategy project management?

387. Are procedures followed to ensure information is available to stakeholders in a timely manner?

388. How does a Static Code Analysis Strategy project life cycle differ from a product life cycle?

389. When would a milestone chart be used instead of a bar char?

2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet: Static Code Analysis Strategy

390. When does your organization expect to be able to complete it?

391. Is a construction detail attached (to aid in explanation)?

392. For other activities, how much delay can be tolerated?

393. Done before proceeding with this activity or what can be done concurrently?

394. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project provide innovative ways for stakeholders to overcome obstacles or deliver better outcomes?

395. Define the work as completely as possible. What work will be included in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

396. Small or large Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

397. Value pocket identification & quantification what are value pockets?

398. What is the total time required to complete the Static Code Analysis Strategy project if no delays occur?

399. What is your role?

400. Can the Static Code Analysis Strategy project be constructed as planned?

401. What is an Average Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

402. How should ongoing costs be monitored to try to keep the Static Code Analysis Strategy project within budget?

403. What work will be included in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

404. How can the Static Code Analysis Strategy project be displayed graphically to better visualize the activities?

405. Science = process: remember the scientific method?

406. Is the Static Code Analysis Strategy project responsive to community need?

2.19 Project Schedule: Static Code Analysis Strategy

407. What is the purpose of a Static Code Analysis Strategy project schedule?

408. How do you know that youhave done this right?

409. Are there activities that came from a template or previous Static Code Analysis Strategy project that are not applicable on this phase of this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

410. Why or why not?

411. Why do you think schedule issues often cause the most conflicts on Static Code Analysis Strategy projects?

412. Have all Static Code Analysis Strategy project delays been adequately accounted for, communicated to all stakeholders and adjustments made in overall Static Code Analysis Strategy project schedule?

413. Should you have a test for each code module?

414. Is the Static Code Analysis Strategy project schedule available for all Static Code Analysis Strategy project team members to review?

415. Schedule/cost recovery?

416. Are key risk mitigation strategies added to the Static Code Analysis Strategy project schedule?

417. Does the condition or event threaten the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects objectives in any ways?

418. Why do you need to manage Static Code Analysis Strategy project Risk?

419. Eliminate unnecessary activities. Are there activities that came from a template or previous Static Code Analysis Strategy project that are not applicable on this phase of this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

420. How closely did the initial Static Code Analysis Strategy project Schedule compare with the actual schedule?

421. Change management required?

422. Why is this particularly bad?

2.20 Cost Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

423. Designated small business reserve?

424. Is the communication plan being followed?

425. Were Static Code Analysis Strategy project team members involved in detailed estimating and scheduling?

426. Are mitigation strategies identified?

427. Has a sponsor been identified?

428. Responsibilities – what is the split of responsibilities between the owner and contractors?

429. Are Static Code Analysis Strategy project team members committed fulltime?

430. Is the structure for tracking the Static Code Analysis Strategy project schedule well defined and assigned to a specific individual?

431. Are assumptions being identified, recorded, analyzed, qualified and closed?

432. Are trade-offs between accepting the risk and mitigating the risk identified?

433. What would the life cycle costs be?

434. Resources – how will human resources be scheduled during each phase of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

435. Are Static Code Analysis Strategy project leaders committed to this Static Code Analysis Strategy project full time?

436. Contractors scope – how will contractors scope be defined when contracts are let?

437. Has the schedule been baselined?

438. Have all involved Static Code Analysis Strategy project stakeholders and work groups committed to the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

439. What is Static Code Analysis Strategy project management?

440. Are changes in scope (deliverable commitments) agreed to by all affected groups & individuals?

441. Was the Static Code Analysis Strategy project schedule reviewed by all stakeholders and formally accepted?

2.21 Activity Cost Estimates: Static Code Analysis Strategy

442. Was it performed on time?

443. What were things that you did well, and could improve, and how?

444. Were the costs or charges reasonable?

445. What were things that you need to improve?

446. What cost data should be used to estimate costs during the 2-year follow-up period?

447. Review – what are some common errors in activities to avoid?

448. How do you fund change orders?

449. Does the estimator estimate by task or by person?

450. What is the last item a Static Code Analysis Strategy project manager must do to finalize Static Code Analysis Strategy project close-out?

451. Would you hire them again?

452. What makes a good activity description?

453. What is the activity inventory?

454. Based on your Static Code Analysis Strategy project communication management plan, what worked well?

455. One way to define activities is to consider how organization employees describe jobs to families and friends. You basically want to know, What do you do?

456. What do you want to know about the stay to know if costs were inappropriately high or low?

457. Can you change your activities?

458. If you are asked to lower your estimate because the price is too high, what are your options?

459. Scope statement only direct or indirect costs as well?

460. How do you change activities?

461. Padding is bad and contingencies are good. what is the difference?

2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet: Static Code Analysis Strategy

462. How will the results be shared and to whom?

463. What is the purpose of estimating?

464. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project provide innovative ways for stakeholders to overcome obstacles or deliver better outcomes?

465. What additional Static Code Analysis Strategy project(s) could be initiated as a result of this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

466. Can a trend be established from historical performance data on the selected measure and are the criteria for using trend analysis or forecasting methods met?

467. What can be included?

468. Will the Static Code Analysis Strategy project collaborate with the local community and leverage resources?

469. What is the estimated labor cost today based upon this information?

470. Is the Static Code Analysis Strategy project responsive to community need?

471. Ask: are others positioned to know, are others credible, and will others cooperate?

472. What happens to any remaining funds not used?

473. What info is needed?

474. What costs are to be estimated?

475. Is it feasible to establish a control group arrangement?

476. Identify the timeframe necessary to monitor progress and collect data to determine how the selected measure has changed?

477. What will others want?

478. Who is best positioned to know and assist in identifying corresponding factors?

2.23 Cost Baseline: Static Code Analysis Strategy

479. What is the reality?

480. Have all the product or service deliverables been accepted by the customer?

481. What is the consequence?

482. How difficult will it be to do specific tasks on the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

483. Has the documentation relating to operation and maintenance of the product(s) or service(s) been delivered to, and accepted by, operations management?

484. Is there anything unique in this Static Code Analysis Strategy projects scope statement that will affect resources?

485. How accurate do cost estimates need to be?

486. Have the resources used by the Static Code Analysis Strategy project been reassigned to other units or Static Code Analysis Strategy projects?

487. What is the most important thing to do next to make your Static Code Analysis Strategy project successful?

488. What is cost and Static Code Analysis Strategy project cost management?

489. Are procedures defined by which the cost baseline may be changed?

490. Does it impact schedule, cost, quality?

491. Is there anything you need from upper management in order to be successful?

492. When should cost estimates be developed?

493. Have all approved changes to the schedule baseline been identified and impact on the Static Code Analysis Strategy project documented?

494. At which frequency ?

495. What deliverables come first?

496. Are you meeting with your team regularly?

2.24 Quality Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

497. Who else should be involved ?

498. Are there standards for code development?

499. How does your organization perform analyzes to assess overall organizational performance and set priorities?

500. Are you meeting the quality standards?

501. How long do you retain data?

502. How are changes to procedures made?

503. How do you decide what information to record?

504. If it is out of compliance, should the process be amended or should the Plan be amended?

505. What would you gain if you spent time working to improve this process?

506. Modifications to the requirements?

507. List your organizations customer contact standards that employees are expected to maintain. How are corresponding standards measured?

508. How do your action plans support the strategic objectives?

509. What are your organizations key processes (product, service, business, and support)?

510. Are decisions/actions based on data collected?

511. What are your organizations current levels and trends for the already stated measures related to customer satisfaction/ dissatisfaction and product/service performance?

512. Does the program conduct field testing?

513. Who is approving the QAPP?

514. What are the established criteria that sampling / testing data are compared against?

515. Have all involved stakeholders and work groups committed to the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

2.25 Quality Metrics: Static Code Analysis Strategy

516. Which are the right metrics to use?

517. What method of measurement do you use?

518. Filter visualizations of interest?

519. Do the operators focus on determining; is there anything you need to worry about?

520. Is material complete (and does it meet the standards)?

521. Did the team meet the Static Code Analysis Strategy project success criteria documented in the Quality Metrics Matrix?

522. Product Availability ?

523. Was the overall quality better or worse than previous products?

524. What approved evidence based screening tools can be used?

525. Who is willing to lead?

526. What documentation is required?

527. How do you know if everyone is trying to improve the right things?

528. Is the reporting frequency appropriate?

529. How does one achieve stability?

530. Are quality metrics defined?

531. What can manufacturing professionals do to ensure quality is seen as an integral part of the entire product lifecycle?

532. Are interface issues coordinated?

533. What if the biggest risk to your business were the already stated people who do not complain?

534. Is a risk containment plan in place?

2.26 Process Improvement Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

535. How do you manage quality?

536. If a process improvement framework is being used, which elements will help the problems and goals listed?

537. Management commitment at all levels?

538. Modeling current processes is great, and will you ever see a return on that investment?

539. What is the test-cycle concept?

540. Why do you want to achieve the goal?

541. Does explicit definition of the measures exist?

542. Where do you want to be?

543. Have the frequency of collection and the points in the process where measurements will be made been determined?

544. Where are you now?

545. Are you following the quality standards?

546. What personnel are the champions for the initiative?

547. What personnel are the coaches for your initiative?

548. Has the time line required to move measurement results from the points of collection to databases or users been established?

549. Does your process ensure quality?

550. Who should prepare the process improvement action plan?

551. How do you measure?

552. Are you making progress on the goals?

553. What personnel are the change agents for your initiative?

2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix: Static Code Analysis Strategy

554. Cwbs elements to be subcontracted, with identification of subcontractors?

555. Does the contractors system include procedures for measuring the performance of critical subcontractors?

556. Changes in the nature of the overhead requirements?

557. Do managers and team members provide helpful suggestions during review meetings?

558. What do people write/say on status/Static Code Analysis Strategy project reports?

559. Are there any drawbacks to using a responsibility assignment matrix?

560. Does each activity-deliverable have exactly one Accountable responsibility, so that accountability is clear and decisions can be made quickly?

561. Is all contract work included in the CWBS?

562. Ideas for developing soft skills at your organization?

563. Are control accounts opened and closed based on the start and completion of work contained therein?

564. How do you manage remotely to staff in other Divisions?

565. What materials and procurements needed?

566. Are the requirements for all items of overhead established by rational, traceable processes?

567. Budgets assigned to control accounts?

568. Is it safe to say you can handle more work or that some tasks you are supposed to do arent worth doing?

569. Undistributed budgets, if any?

2.28 Roles and Responsibilities: Static Code Analysis Strategy

570. Do the values and practices inherent in the culture of your organization foster or hinder the process?

571. What should you do now to ensure that you are exceeding expectations and excelling in your current position?

572. Are Static Code Analysis Strategy project team roles and responsibilities identified and documented?

573. Once the responsibilities are defined for the Static Code Analysis Strategy project, have the deliverables, roles and responsibilities been clearly communicated to every participant?

574. Are your budgets supportive of a culture of quality data?

575. Key conclusions and recommendations: Are conclusions and recommendations relevant and acceptable?

576. Implementation of actions: Who are the responsible units?

577. Are governance roles and responsibilities documented?

578. What areas of supervision are challenging for you?

579. Once the responsibilities are defined for the Static Code Analysis Strategy project, have the deliverables, roles and responsibilities been clearly communicated to every participant?

580. What specific behaviors did you observe?

581. To decide whether to use a quality measurement, ask how will you know when it is achieved?

582. Who is responsible for implementation activities and where will the functions, roles and responsibilities be defined?

583. Attainable / achievable: the goal is attainable; can you actually accomplish the goal?

584. Is the data complete?

585. Do you take the time to clearly define roles and responsibilities on Static Code Analysis Strategy project tasks?

586. Was the expectation clearly communicated?

587. Who is responsible for each task?

588. Required skills, knowledge, experience?

2.29 Human Resource Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

589. Do Static Code Analysis Strategy project managers participating in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project know the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects true status first hand?

590. Has the business need been clearly defined?

591. Have Static Code Analysis Strategy project team accountabilities & responsibilities been clearly defined?

592. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project have a Statement of Work?

593. Are schedule deliverables actually delivered?

594. Is there an issues management plan in place?

595. Are updated Static Code Analysis Strategy project time & resource estimates reasonable based on the current Static Code Analysis Strategy project stage?

596. Are action items captured and managed?

597. Is a stakeholder management plan in place that covers topics?

598. Does all Static Code Analysis Strategy project documentation reside in a common repository for easy access?

599. How will the Static Code Analysis Strategy project manage expectations & meet needs and requirements?

600. Is there a Quality Management Plan?

601. Is documentation created for communication with the suppliers and Vendors?

602. Are the Static Code Analysis Strategy project plans updated on a frequent basis?

603. Were decisions made in a timely manner?

604. Is Static Code Analysis Strategy project status reviewed with the steering and executive teams at appropriate intervals?

2.30 Communications Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

605. Who are the members of the governing body?

606. Are you constantly rushing from meeting to meeting?

607. Are others part of the communications management plan?

608. Who to learn from?

609. What help do you and your team need from the stakeholder?

610. Which team member will work with each stakeholder?

611. Conflict resolution -which method when?

612. What is Static Code Analysis Strategy project communications management?

613. Are there potential barriers between the team and the stakeholder?

614. Who will use or be affected by the result of a Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

615. How will the person responsible for executing the communication item be notified?

616. Who have you worked with in past, similar initiatives?

617. Are others needed?

618. Why do you manage communications?

619. What approaches to you feel are the best ones to use?

620. Do you feel more overwhelmed by stakeholders?

621. What is the stakeholders level of authority?

622. What communications method?

623. Is the stakeholder role recognized by your organization?

624. Who did you turn to if you had questions?

2.31 Risk Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

625. Are people attending meetings and doing work?

626. Costs associated with late delivery or a defective product?

627. Is the process being followed?

628. Are the required plans included, such as nonstructural flood risk management plans?

629. Why might it be late?

630. What will the damage be?

631. Who has experience with this?

632. If you can not fix it, how do you do it differently?

633. What would you do?

634. How is risk monitoring performed?

635. Mitigation -how can you avoid the risk?

636. What are the cost, schedule and resource impacts if the risk does occur?

637. Where are you confronted with risks during the business phases?

638. Are certain activities taking a long time to complete?

639. What risks are tracked?

640. Internal technical and management reviews?

641. Which is an input to the risk management process?

642. What other risks are created by choosing an avoidance strategy?

643. Is the customer technically sophisticated in the product area?

644. Minimize cost and financial risk?

2.32 Risk Register: Static Code Analysis Strategy

645. Severity Prediction?

646. Risk probability and impact: how will the probabilities and impacts of risk items be assessed?

647. Are implemented controls working as others should?

648. Risk documentation: what reporting formats and processes will be used for risk management activities?

649. What should you do now?

650. Are there other alternative controls that could be implemented?

651. When would you develop a risk register?

652. Market risk -will the new service or product be useful to your organization or marketable to others?

653. What further options might be available for responding to the risk?

654. What are the main aims, objectives of the policy, strategy, or service and the intended outcomes?

655. What is a Community Risk Register?

656. Preventative actions - planned actions to reduce the likelihood a risk will occur and/or reduce the seriousness should it occur. What should you do now?

657. What are you going to do to limit the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects risk exposure due to the identified risks?

658. Does the evidence highlight any areas to advance opportunities or foster good relations. If yes what steps will be taken?

659. Cost/benefit – how much will the proposed mitigations cost and how does this cost compare with the potential cost of the risk event/situation should it occur?

660. Amongst the action plans and recommendations that you have to introduce are there some that could stop or delay the overall program?

661. When is it going to be done?

662. Can the likelihood and impact of failing to achieve corresponding recommendations and action plans be assessed?

663. Do you require further engagement?

2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment: Static Code Analysis Strategy

664. Are the risk data complete?

665. What is the probability of the risk occurring?

666. Which role do you have in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

667. Will new information become available during the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

668. Risk urgency assessment -which of your risks could occur soon, or require a longer planning time?

669. What significant shift will occur in governmental policies, laws, and regulations pertaining to specific industries?

670. Are the best people available?

671. What risks does the employee encounter?

672. Are there new risks that mitigation strategies might introduce?

673. Are some people working on multiple Static Code Analysis Strategy projects?

674. What are the probabilities of chosen technologies being suitable for local conditions?

675. Do you have a mechanism for managing change?

676. Can the risk be avoided by choosing a different alternative?

677. Who are the international/overseas Static Code Analysis Strategy project partners (equipment supplier/supplier/consultant/contractor) for this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

678. What are your data sources?

679. What action do you usually take against risks?

680. What kind of preparation would be required to do this?

681. What should be the level of coordination?

682. What risks does your organization have if the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects fail to meet deadline?

683. Are staff committed for the duration of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix: Static Code Analysis Strategy

684. How would you assess the risk management process in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

685. Is the process supported by tools?

686. What is the likelihood?

687. Are there alternative opinions/solutions/processes you should explore?

688. What can you do about it?

689. What would be the best solution?

690. What can you use the analyzed risks for?

691. How are you working with risks?

692. Mandated specific features?

693. Amount of reused software?

694. What is the best method for analysing the risks for different types of Static Code Analysis Strategy projects?

695. What will be cost of redeployment of the personnel?

696. Who is going to be the consortium leader?

697. How carefully have the potential competitors been identified?

698. What will be the likely political situation during the life of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

699. Do the people have the right combinations of skills?

700. How are risks and risk management perceived in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

701. Are you working on the right risks?

2.35 Risk Data Sheet: Static Code Analysis Strategy

702. Type of risk identified?

703. What are you weak at and therefore need to do better?

704. What if client refuses?

705. Has the most cost-effective solution been chosen?

706. Whom do you serve (customers)?

707. Is the data sufficiently specified in terms of the type of failure being analyzed, and its frequency or probability?

708. Are new hazards created?

709. What do you know?

710. How reliable is the data source?

711. Potential for recurrence?

712. What are you here for (Mission)?

713. What do people affected think about the need for, and practicality of preventive measures?

714. If it happens, what are the consequences?

715. What is the environment within which you operate (social trends, economic, community values, broad based participation, national directions etc.)?

716. How can hazards be reduced?

717. What is the chance that it will happen?

718. What are you trying to achieve (Objectives)?

719. What will be the consequences if the risk happens?

720. What are the main threats to your existence?

721. How can it happen?

2.36 Procurement Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

722. Has the scope management document been updated and distributed to help prevent scope creep?

723. Have all unresolved risks been documented?

724. Is the current scope of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project substantially different than that originally defined?

725. What were things that you did very well and want to do the same again on the next Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

726. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project team have the right skills?

727. Are vendor invoices audited for accuracy before payment?

728. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project have a formal Static Code Analysis Strategy project Charter?

729. Are there checklists created to determine if all quality processes are followed?

730. Has a Static Code Analysis Strategy project Communications Plan been developed?

731. Are key risk mitigation strategies added to the Static Code Analysis Strategy project schedule?

732. Does the detailed work plan match the complexity of tasks with the capabilities of personnel?

733. Are adequate resources provided for the quality assurance function?

734. Is it possible to track all classes of Static Code Analysis Strategy project work (e.g. scheduled, un-scheduled, defect repair, etc.)?

735. Are Static Code Analysis Strategy project team members involved in detailed estimating and scheduling?

736. Does the business case include how the Static Code Analysis Strategy project aligns with your organizations strategic goals & objectives?

737. Based on your Static Code Analysis Strategy project communication management plan, what worked well?

738. Have the key elements of a coherent Static Code Analysis Strategy project management strategy been established?

739. Are changes in deliverable commitments agreed to by all affected groups & individuals?

740. Is the schedule updated on a periodic basis?

2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Static Code Analysis Strategy

741. Do you ensure you evaluate what you asked for, not what you want to see or expect to see?

742. What are open book debriefings?

743. Do you prepare an independent cost estimate?

744. Does your documentation identify why the team concurs or differs with reported performance from past performance report (CPARs, questionnaire responses, etc.)?

745. When is it appropriate to issue a DRFP?

746. Do you have designated specific forms or worksheets?

747. How important is cost in the source selection decision relative to past performance and technical considerations?

748. How will you decide an evaluators write up is sufficient?

749. What will you use to capture evaluation and subsequent documentation?

750. Is this a cost contract?

751. Is the offeror pricing what is technically proposed?

752. Is a cost realism analysis used?

753. What is cost analysis and when should it be performed?

754. What information is to be provided and when should it be provided?

755. How should the preproposal conference be conducted?

756. What does a sample rating scale look like?

757. When must you conduct a debriefing?

758. What is price analysis and when should it be performed?

759. In which phase of the acquisition process cycle does source qualifications reside?

760. Are considerations anticipated?

2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

761. Do all stakeholders know how to access this repository and where to find the Static Code Analysis Strategy project documentation?

762. Is an industry recognized mechanized support tool(s) being used for Static Code Analysis Strategy project scheduling & tracking?

763. Are you meeting your customers expectations consistently?

764. What are reporting requirements?

765. Are the results of quality assurance reviews provided to affected groups & individuals?

766. Does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project have a formal Static Code Analysis Strategy project Charter?

767. Are actuals compared against estimates to analyze and correct variances?

768. Is there a formal set of procedures supporting Stakeholder Management?

769. Have all documents been archived in a Static Code Analysis Strategy project repository for each release?

770. Are all resource assumptions documented?

771. Are estimating assumptions and constraints captured?

772. Are parking lot items captured?

773. When would you develop a Static Code Analysis Strategy project Business Plan?

774. Are the key elements of a Static Code Analysis Strategy project Charter present?

775. Is the quality assurance team identified?

776. Have stakeholder accountabilities & responsibilities been clearly defined?

2.39 Change Management Plan: Static Code Analysis Strategy

777. How can you best frame the message so that it addresses the audiences interests?

778. Are there resource implications for your communications strategy?

779. When does it make sense to customize?

780. What provokes organizational change?

781. What is the worst thing that can happen if you chose not to communicate this information?

782. What are the specific target groups / audience that will be impacted by this change?

783. When to start change management?

784. Have the business unit contacts been selected and notified?

785. What new behaviours are required?

786. Who will fund the training?

787. What policies and procedures need to be changed?

788. Who is responsible for which tasks?

789. How frequently should you repeat the message?

790. Has the training provider been established?

791. What are the major changes to processes?

792. Change invariability confront many relationships especially the already stated that require a set of behaviours What roles with in your organization are affected and how?

793. Who might be able to help you the most?

794. Would you need to tailor a special message for each segment of the audience?

795. Do you need a new organization structure?

796. Who should be involved in developing a change management strategy?

3.0 Executing Process Group: Static Code Analysis Strategy

797. How do you control progress of your Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

798. Will outside resources be needed to help?

799. What good practices or successful experiences or transferable examples have been identified?

800. What are deliverables of your Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

801. Are decisions made in a timely manner?

802. How do you measure difficulty?

803. Will additional funds be needed for hardware or software?

804. Have operating capacities been created and/or reinforced in partners?

805. How well did the chosen processes produce the expected results?

806. What is the critical path for this Static Code Analysis Strategy project and how long is it?

807. How many different communication channels does the Static Code Analysis Strategy project team have?

808. Who will provide training?

809. What type of information goes in the quality assurance plan?

810. What is in place for ensuring adequate change control on Static Code Analysis Strategy projects that involve outside contracts?

811. Why is it important to determine activity sequencing on Static Code Analysis Strategy projects?

812. Would you rate yourself as being risk-averse, risk-neutral, or risk-seeking?

813. How can your organization use a weighted decision matrix to evaluate proposals as part of source selection?

814. What is the shortest possible time it will take to complete this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

3.1 Team Member Status Report: Static Code Analysis Strategy

815. Are your organizations Static Code Analysis Strategy projects more successful over time?

816. How much risk is involved?

817. Does every department have to have a Static Code Analysis Strategy project Manager on staff?

818. Will the staff do training or is that done by a third party?

819. How can you make it practical?

820. Are the products of your organizations Static Code Analysis Strategy projects meeting customers objectives?

821. Is there evidence that staff is taking a more professional approach toward management of your organizations Static Code Analysis Strategy projects?

822. Why is it to be done?

823. Do you have an Enterprise Static Code Analysis Strategy project Management Office (EPMO)?

824. How will resource planning be done?

825. Does your organization have the means (staff, money, contract, etc.) to produce or to acquire the product, good, or service?

826. Does the product, good, or service already exist within your organization?

827. What specific interest groups do you have in place?

828. When a teams productivity and success depend on collaboration and the efficient flow of information, what generally fails them?

829. The problem with Reward & Recognition Programs is that the truly deserving people all too often get left out. How can you make it practical?

830. Are the attitudes of staff regarding Static Code Analysis Strategy project work improving?

831. What is to be done?

832. How does this product, good, or service meet the needs of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project and your organization as a whole?

833. How it is to be done?

3.2 Change Request: Static Code Analysis Strategy

834. What are the basic mechanics of the Change Advisory Board (CAB)?

835. How many times must the change be modified or presented to the change control board before it is approved?

836. When to submit a change request?

837. What is the relationship between requirements attributes and attributes like complexity and size?

838. Who is responsible for the implementation and monitoring of all measures?

839. Why do you want to have a change control system?

840. How are the measures for carrying out the change established?

841. How to get changes (code) out in a timely manner?

842. Should a more thorough impact analysis be conducted?

843. Who needs to approve change requests?

844. Why were your requested changes rejected or not made?

845. How shall the implementation of changes be recorded?

846. Will the change use memory to the extent that other functions will be not have sufficient memory to operate effectively?

847. Can you answer what happened, who did it, when did it happen, and what else will be affected?

848. What is a Change Request Form?

849. Can static requirements change attributes like the size of the change be used to predict reliability in execution?

850. What kind of information about the change request needs to be captured?

851. What is the relationship between requirements attributes and reliability?

852. Describe how modifications, enhancements, defects and/or deficiencies shall be notified (e.g. Problem Reports, Change Requests etc) and managed. Detail warranty and/or maintenance periods?

853. Who is included in the change control team?

3.3 Change Log: Static Code Analysis Strategy

854. Is the change request open, closed or pending?

855. Is the change request within Static Code Analysis Strategy project scope?

856. How does this change affect the timeline of the schedule?

857. Is the requested change request a result of changes in other Static Code Analysis Strategy project(s)?

858. Is this a mandatory replacement?

859. When was the request submitted?

860. How does this change affect scope?

861. Does the suggested change request represent a desired enhancement to the products functionality?

862. Where do changes come from?

863. Who initiated the change request?

864. Is the submitted change a new change or a modification of a previously approved change?

865. Do the described changes impact on the integrity or security of the system?

866. Does the suggested change request seem to represent a necessary enhancement to the product?

867. When was the request approved?

868. Will the Static Code Analysis Strategy project fail if the change request is not executed?

869. How does this relate to the standards developed for specific business processes?

870. Is the change backward compatible without limitations?

3.4 Decision Log: Static Code Analysis Strategy

871. Behaviors; what are guidelines that the team has identified that will assist them with getting the most out of team meetings?

872. How do you define success?

873. Does anything need to be adjusted?

874. How effective is maintaining the log at facilitating organizational learning?

875. Which variables make a critical difference?

876. Linked to original objective?

877. How consolidated and comprehensive a story can you tell by capturing currently available incident data in a central location and through a log of key decisions during an incident?

878. Meeting purpose; why does this team meet?

879. How does provision of information, both in terms of content and presentation, influence acceptance of alternative strategies?

880. What is your overall strategy for quality control / quality assurance procedures?

881. Adversarial environment. is your opponent open to a non-traditional workflow, or will it likely challenge anything you do?

882. At what point in time does loss become unacceptable?

883. Is your opponent open to a non-traditional workflow, or will it likely challenge anything you do?

884. What eDiscovery problem or issue did your organization set out to fix or make better?

885. How does an increasing emphasis on cost containment influence the strategies and tactics used?

886. What makes you different or better than others companies selling the same thing?

887. Do strategies and tactics aimed at less than full control reduce the costs of management or simply shift the cost burden?

888. With whom was the decision shared or considered?

889. Who is the decisionmaker?

890. What was the rationale for the decision?

3.5 Quality Audit: Static Code Analysis Strategy

891. How does your organization know that its quality of teaching is appropriately effective and constructive?

892. Are the review comments incorporated?

893. Are there sufficient personnel having the necessary education, background, training, and experience to assure that all operations are correctly performed?

894. How does your organization know that its staff support services planning and management systems are appropriately effective and constructive?

895. Have the risks associated with the intentions been identified, analyzed and appropriate responses developed?

896. How does your organization know that its relationship with its (past) staff is appropriately effective and constructive?

897. How do you indicate the extent to which your personnel would be expected to contribute to the work effort?

898. How does your organization know that its systems for assisting staff with career planning and employment placements are appropriately effective and constructive?

899. How does your organization know that the quality of its supervisors is appropriately effective and constructive?

900. How does your organization know that its system for governing staff behaviour is appropriately effective and constructive?

901. How does your organization know that it provides a safe and healthy environment?

902. Quality is about improvement and accountability. The immediate questions that arise out of that statement are: (i) improvement on what, and (ii) accountable to whom?

903. How do staff know if they are doing a good job?

904. What does an analysis of your organizations staff profile suggest in terms of its planning, and how is this being addressed?

905. How does your organization know that its staff embody the core knowledge, skills and characteristics for which it wishes to be recognized?

906. How does your organization know that its relationships with the community at large are appropriately effective and constructive?

907. How does your organization know that its public relations and marketing systems are appropriately effective and constructive?

908. It is inappropriate to seek information about the Audit Panels preliminary views including questions like why do you ask that?

909. How does your organization know whether they are adhering to mission and achieving objectives?

910. Can your organization demonstrate exactly how and why results were achieved?

3.6 Team Directory: Static Code Analysis Strategy

911. Why is the work necessary?

912. Who will be the stakeholders on your next Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

913. Contract requirements complied with?

914. Timing: when do the effects of communication take place?

915. How will you accomplish and manage the objectives?

916. Have you decided when to celebrate the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects completion date?

917. How do unidentified risks impact the outcome of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

918. Who is the Sponsor?

919. When does information need to be distributed?

920. Who will talk to the customer?

921. Is construction on schedule?

922. Process decisions: are contractors adequately prosecuting the work?

923. Process decisions: do invoice amounts match accepted work in place?

924. How and in what format should information be presented?

925. Days from the time the issue is identified?

926. Process decisions: do job conditions warrant additional actions to collect job information and document on-site activity?

927. Do purchase specifications and configurations match requirements?

928. Who will write the meeting minutes and distribute?

929. Where should the information be distributed?

930. Who should receive information (all stakeholders)?

3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Static Code Analysis Strategy

931. What is culture?

932. Are there differences in access to communication and collaboration technology based on team member location?

933. Did you draft the meeting agenda?

934. Do you leverage technology engagement tools group chat, polls, screen sharing, etc.?

935. Do you upload presentation materials in advance and test the technology?

936. What is the anticipated procedure (recruitment, solicitation of volunteers, or assignment) for selecting team members?

937. Why does your organization want to participate in teaming?

938. What is group supervision?

939. How does teaming fit in with overall organizational goals and meet organizational needs?

940. Are team roles clearly defined and accepted?

941. Have you set the goals and objectives of the team?

942. Conflict resolution: how will disputes and other conflicts be mediated or resolved?

943. To whom do you deliver your services?

944. Must your team members rely on the expertise of other members to complete tasks?

945. Are there more than two native languages represented by your team?

946. Are leadership responsibilities shared among team members (versus a single leader)?

947. Do you ensure that all participants know how to use the required technology?

948. Do you call or email participants to ensure understanding, follow-through and commitment to the meeting outcomes?

949. What are the current caseload numbers in the unit?

950. Are there the right people on your team?

3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Static Code Analysis Strategy

951. To what degree are the skill areas critical to team performance present?

952. To what degree are staff involved as partners in the improvement process?

953. To what degree is there a sense that only the team can succeed?

954. Which situations call for a more extreme type of adaptiveness in which team members actually re-define roles?

955. To what degree do team members feel that the purpose of the team is important, if not exciting?

956. To what degree do all members feel responsible for all agreed-upon measures?

957. What makes opportunities more or less obvious?

958. To what degree does the teams purpose constitute a broader, deeper aspiration than just accomplishing short-term goals?

959. To what degree do team members agree with the goals, relative importance, and the ways in which achievement will be measured?

960. What structural changes have you made or are you preparing to make?

961. What are teams?

962. To what degree do members understand and articulate the same purpose without relying on ambiguous abstractions?

963. To what degree are the relative importance and priority of the goals clear to all team members?

964. To what degree does the team possess adequate membership to achieve its ends?

965. To what degree are corresponding categories of skills either actually or potentially represented across the membership?

966. To what degree does the teams purpose contain themes that are particularly meaningful and memorable?

967. How does Static Code Analysis Strategy project termination impact Static Code Analysis Strategy project team members?

968. To what degree can team members vigorously define the teams purpose in considerations with others who are not part of the functioning team?

969. How do you encourage members to learn from each other?

970. What are you doing specifically to develop the leaders around you?

3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Static Code Analysis Strategy

971. How do you currently use the time that is available?

972. How should adaptive assessments be implemented?

973. How will they be formed?

974. What is the large, desired outcome?

975. To what extent did the evaluation influence the instructional path, such as with adaptive testing?

976. What are acceptable governance changes?

977. Does statute or regulation require the job responsibility?

978. What happens if a team member receives a Rating of Unsatisfactory?

979. How often should assessments be conducted?

980. What, if any, steps are available for employees who feel they have been unfairly or inaccurately rated?

981. What is a general description of the processes under performance measurement and assessment?

982. How is the timing of assessments organized (e.g., pre/post-test, single point during training, multiple reassessment during training)?

983. How do you work together to improve teaching and learning?

984. How is assessment information achieved, stored?

985. To what degree is the team cognizant of small wins to be celebrated along the way?

986. What is collaboration?

987. What is the target group for instruction (e.g., individual and collective or small team instruction)?

3.10 Issue Log: Static Code Analysis Strategy

988. In classifying stakeholders, which approach to do so are you using?

989. Are they needed?

990. Do you feel a register helps?

991. What is the impact on the Business Case?

992. What steps can you take for positive relationships?

993. Who do you turn to if you have questions?

994. Who is involved as you identify stakeholders?

995. What is the impact on the risks?

996. What are the typical contents?

997. What is the status of the issue?

998. In your work, how much time is spent on stakeholder identification?

999. Who is the stakeholder?

1000. Who needs to know and how much?

1001. What does the stakeholder need from the team?

1002. Who were proponents/opponents?

4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1003. How well defined and documented were the Static Code Analysis Strategy project management processes you chose to use?

1004. How is agile portfolio management done?

1005. Accuracy: what design will lead to accurate information?

1006. Did you implement the program as designed?

1007. Is the program in place as intended?

1008. Based on your Static Code Analysis Strategy project communication management plan, what worked well?

1009. Are the services being delivered?

1010. Specific - is the objective clear in terms of what, how, when, and where the situation will be changed?

1011. How is agile Static Code Analysis Strategy project management done?

1012. Measurable - are the targets measurable?

1013. How were collaborations developed, and how are they sustained?

1014. What are the deliverables?

1015. Did the Static Code Analysis Strategy project team have enough people to execute the Static Code Analysis Strategy project plan?

1016. In what way has the program come up with innovative measures for problem-solving?

1017. Is the verbiage used appropriate and understandable?

1018. What are the goals of the program?

4.1 Project Performance Report: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1019. To what degree does the information network provide individuals with the information they require?

1020. To what degree do team members frequently explore the teams purpose and its implications?

1021. To what degree does the teams work approach provide opportunity for members to engage in fact-based problem solving?

1022. To what degree can the team ensure that all members are individually and jointly accountable for the teams purpose, goals, approach, and work-products?

1023. To what degree does the funding match the requirement?

1024. To what degree do team members articulate the teams work approach?

1025. How will procurement be coordinated with other Static Code Analysis Strategy project aspects, such as scheduling and performance reporting?

1026. Next Steps?

1027. To what degree does the informal organization make use of individual resources and meet individual needs?

1028. To what degree can the cognitive capacity of individuals accommodate the flow of information?

1029. To what degree will the approach capitalize on and enhance the skills of all team members in a manner that takes into consideration other demands on members of the team?

1030. To what degree will new and supplemental skills be introduced as the need is recognized?

1031. To what degree does the teams work approach provide opportunity for members to engage in results-based evaluation?

1032. To what degree will the team ensure that all members equitably share the work essential to the success of the team?

1033. To what degree do team members understand one anothers roles and skills?

1034. To what degree can team members frequently and easily communicate with one another?

1035. What is the degree to which rules govern information exchange between groups?

4.2 Variance Analysis: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1036. Are all elements of indirect expense identified to overhead cost budgets of Static Code Analysis Strategy projections?

1037. Are all budgets assigned to control accounts?

1038. Are all authorized tasks assigned to identified organizational elements?

1039. Historical experience?

1040. How do you manage changes in the nature of the overhead requirements?

1041. Are detailed work packages planned as far in advance as practicable?

1042. Is cost and schedule performance measurement done in a consistent, systematic manner?

1043. Did an existing competitor change strategy?

1044. Budgeted cost for work performed?

1045. Does the accounting system provide a basis for auditing records of direct costs chargeable to the contract?

1046. Are records maintained to show how undistributed budgets are controlled?

1047. Who is generally responsible for monitoring and taking action on variances?

1048. What is the dollar amount of the fluctuation?

1049. Does the contractor use objective results, design reviews and tests to trace schedule performance?

1050. Favorable or unfavorable variance?

1051. How are variances affected by multiple material and labor categories?

1052. Contract line items and end items?

1053. Are overhead cost budgets established for each department which has authority to incur overhead costs?

1054. Is data disseminated to the contractors management timely, accurate, and usable?

4.3 Earned Value Status: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1055. When is it going to finish?

1056. If earned value management (EVM) is so good in determining the true status of a Static Code Analysis Strategy project and Static Code Analysis Strategy project its completion, why is it that hardly any one uses it in information systems related Static Code Analysis Strategy projects?

1057. Earned value can be used in almost any Static Code Analysis Strategy project situation and in almost any Static Code Analysis Strategy project environment. it may be used on large Static Code Analysis Strategy projects, medium sized Static Code Analysis Strategy projects, tiny Static Code Analysis Strategy projects (in cut-down form), complex and simple Static Code Analysis Strategy projects and in any market sector. some people, of course, know all about earned value, they have used it for years - but perhaps not as effectively as they could have?

1058. How does this compare with other Static Code Analysis Strategy projects?

1059. What is the unit of forecast value?

1060. Validation is a process of ensuring that the developed system will actually achieve the stakeholders desired outcomes; Are you building the right product? What do you validate?

1061. Verification is a process of ensuring that the developed system satisfies the stakeholders agreements and specifications; Are you building the product right? What do you verify?

1062. Where are your problem areas?

1063. Where is evidence-based earned value in your organization reported?

1064. Are you hitting your Static Code Analysis Strategy projects targets?

1065. How much is it going to cost by the finish?

4.4 Risk Audit: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1066. To what extent should analytical procedures be utilized in the risk-assessment process?

1067. Are policies communicated to all affected?

1068. Auditor independence: a burdensome constraint or a core value?

1069. Extending the consideration on the halo effect, to what extent are auditors able to build skepticism in evidence review?

1070. Do you manage the process through use of metrics?

1071. Do you have a procedure for dealing with complaints?

1072. Does your auditor understand your business?

1073. What limitations do auditors face in effectively applying risk-assessment results to the risk of material misstatement measures?

1074. Can assurance be expanded beyond the traditional audit without undermining independence?

1075. What programmatic and Fiscal information is being collected and analyzed?

1076. Do you ensure the recommended rules of play and protocols are followed for your activity?

1077. What are the outcomes you are looking for?

1078. When your organization is entering into a major contract, does it seek legal advice?

1079. Do you have financial policies and procedures in place to guide officers of your organization/treasurer/general members?

1080. From an empirical perspective, does the business risk approach lead to a more effective audit, or simply to increased consulting revenue detrimental to audit rigor?

1081. Does your organization have a register of insurance policies detailing all current insurance policies?

1082. Who audits the auditor?

1083. Are testing tools available and suitable?

1084. What are the differences and similarities between strategic and operational risks in your organization?

1085. Have all possible risks/hazards been identified (including injury to staff, damage to equipment, impact on others in the community)?

4.5 Contractor Status Report: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1086. Describe how often regular updates are made to the proposed solution. Are corresponding regular updates included in the standard maintenance plan?

1087. Who can list a Static Code Analysis Strategy project as organization experience, your organization or a previous employee of your organization?

1088. What was the overall budget or estimated cost?

1089. What was the budget or estimated cost for your organizations services?

1090. How does the proposed individual meet each requirement?

1091. What was the actual budget or estimated cost for your organizations services?

1092. Are there contractual transfer concerns?

1093. What process manages the contracts?

1094. How long have you been using the services?

1095. If applicable; describe your standard schedule for new software version releases. Are new software version releases included in the standard maintenance plan?

1096. What is the average response time for answering a support call?

1097. How is risk transferred?

1098. What was the final actual cost?

1099. What are the minimum and optimal bandwidth requirements for the proposed solution?

4.6 Formal Acceptance: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1100. How does your team plan to obtain formal acceptance on your Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

1101. What can you do better next time?

1102. General estimate of the costs and times to complete the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

1103. What lessons were learned about your Static Code Analysis Strategy project management methodology?

1104. Did the Static Code Analysis Strategy project achieve its MOV?

1105. Is formal acceptance of the Static Code Analysis Strategy project product documented and distributed?

1106. What features, practices, and processes proved to be strengths or weaknesses?

1107. What are the requirements against which to test, Who will execute?

1108. Was business value realized?

1109. What is the Acceptance Management Process?

1110. Did the Static Code Analysis Strategy project manager and team act in a professional and ethical manner?

1111. Do you buy pre-configured systems or build your own configuration?

1112. Do you perform formal acceptance or burn-in tests?

1113. Do you buy-in installation services?

1114. Was the Static Code Analysis Strategy project work done on time, within budget, and according to specification?

1115. What function(s) does it fill or meet?

1116. How well did the team follow the methodology?

1117. Who would use it?

1118. Who supplies data?

1119. Was the client satisfied with the Static Code Analysis Strategy project results?

5.0 Closing Process Group: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1120. What level of risk does the proposed budget represent to the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

1121. What was learned?

1122. What business situation is being addressed?

1123. Did the Static Code Analysis Strategy project team have enough people to execute the Static Code Analysis Strategy project plan?

1124. Was the user/client satisfied with the end product?

1125. Mitigate. what will you do to minimize the impact should a risk event occur?

1126. What were the actual outcomes?

1127. What is the amount of funding and what Static Code Analysis Strategy project phases are funded?

1128. What areas were overlooked on this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

1129. What communication items need improvement?

1130. What is an Encumbrance?

1131. What will you do to minimize the impact should a risk event occur?

1132. Are there funding or time constraints?

1133. Did you do what you said you were going to do?

1134. Will the Static Code Analysis Strategy project deliverable(s) replace a current asset or group of assets?

1135. When will the Static Code Analysis Strategy project be done?

1136. What is the Static Code Analysis Strategy project name and date of completion?

5.1 Procurement Audit: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1137. Did your organization permit tenderers to submit variants, thus offering space for creative solutions and added value?

1138. Was there reasonable justification for the need of the purchase, namely when made towards the end of the financial year?

1139. Is free and fair (international) competition promoted by organizational policies and legislation, in line with legal, trade organizations and other policies?

1140. Are the responsibilities for monitoring the execution and performance of contracts clearly assigned?

1141. What are the threats to supplier relations?

1142. Was a sufficient competitive environment created?

1143. Does an appropriately qualified official check the quality of performance against the contract terms?

1144. Does your organization make sources of information beyond the tender documents equally available for all the candidates?

1145. Is there a forum where the departments suppliers performance is regularly considered with the suppliers?

1146. Does your organization use existing contracts where possible to avoid the cost of bidding?

1147. Are there special emergency purchase order procedures?

1148. Can changes be made to automatic disbursement programs without proper approval of management?

1149. Could bidders learn all relevant information straight from the tender documents?

1150. Is your organization policy on purchasing covered by a written manual?

1151. Who is verifying the performance of the contract and approving payments?

1152. Are periodic audits made of disbursement activities?

1153. Is the chosen supplier part of your organizations database?

1154. Were results of the award procedures published?

1155. Are the users needs clearly and invariably defined and has the expected outcome or mission been clearly identified and communicated in measurable terms?

1156. Months to reflect any changes in policy?

5.2 Contract Close-Out: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1157. What happens to the recipient of services?

1158. How is the contracting office notified of the automatic contract close-out?

1159. Was the contract complete without requiring numerous changes and revisions?

1160. Was the contract type appropriate?

1161. Change in attitude or behavior?

1162. Have all contracts been closed?

1163. What is capture management?

1164. Parties: Authorized?

1165. Are the signers the authorized officials?

1166. Have all acceptance criteria been met prior to final payment to contractors?

1167. Has each contract been audited to verify acceptance and delivery?

1168. Have all contract records been included in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project archives?

1169. How does it work?

1170. How/when used ?

1171. Change in knowledge?

1172. Parties: who is involved?

1173. Have all contracts been completed?

1174. Change in circumstances?

1175. Was the contract sufficiently clear so as not to result in numerous disputes and misunderstandings?

5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1176. What were the goals and objectives of the communications strategy for the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

1177. In addition to assessing whether the Static Code Analysis Strategy project was successful, it is equally critical to analyze why it was or was not fully successful. Are you including this?

1178. Have business partners been involved extensively, and what data was required for them?

1179. What security considerations needed to be addressed during the procurement life cycle?

1180. What was the preferred delivery mechanism?

1181. What is this stakeholder expecting?

1182. Who are the Static Code Analysis Strategy project stakeholders and what are roles and involvement?

1183. What is the information level of detail required for each stakeholder?

1184. What process was planned for managing issues/risks?

1185. Who controlled key decisions that were made?

1186. What are the marketing communication needs for each stakeholder?

1187. Was the schedule met?

1188. What information did each stakeholder need to contribute to the Static Code Analysis Strategy projects success?

1189. Is the lesson based on actual Static Code Analysis Strategy project experience rather than on independent research?

1190. What can you do better next time, and what specific actions can you take to improve?

1191. Planned completion date?

1192. What could be done to improve the process?

1193. Were risks identified and mitigated?

5.4 Lessons Learned: Static Code Analysis Strategy

1194. How much flexibility is there in the funding (e.g., what authorities does the program manager have to change to the specifics of the funding within the overall funding ceiling)?

1195. What were the main bottlenecks on the process?

1196. What were the success factors?

1197. Would you spend your own time fixing this issue?

1198. How closely did deliverables match what was defined within the Static Code Analysis Strategy project Scope?

1199. What are the skills directly related to the task?

1200. What things surprised you on the Static Code Analysis Strategy project that were not in the plan?

1201. What is the distribution of authority?

1202. How many interest groups are stakeholders?

1203. Was the Static Code Analysis Strategy project significantly delayed/hampered by outside dependencies (outside to the Static Code Analysis Strategy project, that is)?

1204. Did the Static Code Analysis Strategy project improve the team members reputations, skills, personal development?

1205. What was helpful to know when planning the deployment?

1206. Was there enough support – guidance, clerical support, training?

1207. If issue escalation was required, how effectively were issues resolved?

1208. How much of your time was spent on other than this Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

1209. What is the expected lifespan of the deliverable?

1210. How well does the product or service the Static Code Analysis Strategy project produced meet the defined Static Code Analysis Strategy project requirements?

1211. What are the performance measures?

1212. Was there a Static Code Analysis Strategy project Definition document. Was there a Static Code Analysis Strategy project Plan. Were they used during the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

1213. How actively and meaningfully were stakeholders involved in the Static Code Analysis Strategy project?

Index

(Index page number references Only of use in Print Version)