Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

Complete Self-Assessment Guide

The guidance in this Self-Assessment is based on Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool best practices and standards in business process architecture, design and quality management. The guidance is also based on the professional judgment of the individual collaborators listed in the Acknowledgments.

Notice of rights

You are licensed to use the Self-Assessment contents in your presentations and materials for internal use and customers without asking us - we are here to help.

All rights reserved for the book itself: this book may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

The information in this book is distributed on an “As Is” basis without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of he book, neither the author nor the publisher shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained in this book or by the products described in it.

Trademarks

Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark claim, the designations appear as requested by the owner of the trademark. All other product names and services identified throughout this book are used in editorial fashion only and for the benefit of such companies with no intention of infringement of the trademark. No such use, or the use of any trade name, is intended to convey endorsement or other affiliation with this book.

Copyright © by The Art of Service

http://theartofservice.com

service@theartofservice.com

About The Art of Service

The Art of Service, Business Process Architects since 2000, is dedicated to helping stakeholders achieve excellence.

Defining, designing, creating, and implementing a process to solve a stakeholders challenge or meet an objective is the most valuable role… In EVERY group, company, organization and department.

Unless you’re talking a one-time, single-use project, there should be a process. Whether that process is managed and implemented by humans, AI, or a combination of the two, it needs to be designed by someone with a complex enough perspective to ask the right questions.

Someone capable of asking the right questions and step back and say, ‘What are we really trying to accomplish here? And is there a different way to look at it?’

With The Art of Service’s Standard Requirements Self-Assessments, we empower people who can do just that — whether their title is marketer, entrepreneur, manager, salesperson, consultant, Business Process Manager, executive assistant, IT Manager, CIO etc… —they are the people who rule the future. They are people who watch the process as it happens, and ask the right questions to make the process work better.

Contact us when you need any support with this Self-Assessment and any help with templates, blue-prints and examples of standard documents you might need:

http://theartofservice.com

service@theartofservice.com

Included Resources - how to access

Included with your purchase of the book is the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool Self-Assessment Spreadsheet Dashboard which contains all questions and Self-Assessment areas and auto-generates insights, graphs, and project RACI planning - all with examples to get you started right away.

How? Simply send an email to

access@theartofservice.com

with this books’ title in the subject to get the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool Self Assessment Tool right away.

You will receive the following contents with New and Updated specific criteria:

•The latest quick edition of the book in PDF

•The latest complete edition of the book in PDF, which criteria correspond to the criteria in…

•The Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard, and…

•Example pre-filled Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard to get familiar with results generation

•In-depth specific Checklists covering the topic

•Project management checklists and templates to assist with implementation

INCLUDES LIFETIME SELF ASSESSMENT UPDATES

Every self assessment comes with Lifetime Updates and Lifetime Free Updated Books. Lifetime Updates is an industry-first feature which allows you to receive verified self assessment updates, ensuring you always have the most accurate information at your fingertips.

Get it now- you will be glad you did - do it now, before you forget.

Send an email to access@theartofservice.com with this books’ title in the subject to get the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool Self Assessment Tool right away.

Purpose of this Self-Assessment

This Self-Assessment has been developed to improve understanding of the requirements and elements of Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool, based on best practices and standards in business process architecture, design and quality management.

It is designed to allow for a rapid Self-Assessment to determine how closely existing management practices and procedures correspond to the elements of the Self-Assessment.

The criteria of requirements and elements of Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool have been rephrased in the format of a Self-Assessment questionnaire, with a seven-criterion scoring system, as explained in this document.

In this format, even with limited background knowledge of Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool, a manager can quickly review existing operations to determine how they measure up to the standards. This in turn can serve as the starting point of a ‘gap analysis’ to identify management tools or system elements that might usefully be implemented in the organization to help improve overall performance.

How to use the Self-Assessment

On the following pages are a series of questions to identify to what extent your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool initiative is complete in comparison to the requirements set in standards.

To facilitate answering the questions, there is a space in front of each question to enter a score on a scale of ‘1’ to ‘5’.

1 Strongly Disagree

2 Disagree

3 Neutral

4 Agree

5 Strongly Agree

Read the question and rate it with the following in front of mind:

‘In my belief,

the answer to this question is clearly defined’.

There are two ways in which you can choose to interpret this statement;

1.how aware are you that the answer to the question is clearly defined

2.for more in-depth analysis you can choose to gather evidence and confirm the answer to the question. This obviously will take more time, most Self-Assessment users opt for the first way to interpret the question and dig deeper later on based on the outcome of the overall Self-Assessment.

A score of ‘1’ would mean that the answer is not clear at all, where a ‘5’ would mean the answer is crystal clear and defined. Leave emtpy when the question is not applicable or you don’t want to answer it, you can skip it without affecting your score. Write your score in the space provided.

After you have responded to all the appropriate statements in each section, compute your average score for that section, using the formula provided, and round to the nearest tenth. Then transfer to the corresponding spoke in the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool Scorecard on the second next page of the Self-Assessment.

Your completed Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool Scorecard will give you a clear presentation of which Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool areas need attention.

Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

Scorecard Example

Example of how the finalized Scorecard can look like:

Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

Scorecard

Your Scores:

BEGINNING OF THE

SELF-ASSESSMENT:

CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE

INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?

<– Score

2. What are your needs in relation to open source static code analysis tool skills, labor, equipment, and markets?

<– Score

3. Does open source static code analysis tool create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?

<– Score

4. How do you recognize an objection?

<– Score

5. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?

<– Score

6. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?

<– Score

7. Who else hopes to benefit from it?

<– Score

8. What open source static code analysis tool capabilities do you need?

<– Score

9. What would happen if open source static code analysis tool weren’t done?

<– Score

10. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?

<– Score

11. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?

<– Score

12. Do you need to avoid or amend any open source static code analysis tool activities?

<– Score

13. What information do users need?

<– Score

14. What is the extent or complexity of the open source static code analysis tool problem?

<– Score

15. Is the need for organizational change recognized?

<– Score

16. What extra resources will you need?

<– Score

17. Who needs what information?

<– Score

18. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize open source static code analysis tool as an effective investment?

<– Score

19. Whom do you really need or want to serve?

<– Score

20. Who needs to know?

<– Score

21. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?

<– Score

22. What needs to be done?

<– Score

23. Do you recognize open source static code analysis tool achievements?

<– Score

24. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

25. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?

<– Score

26. Which issues are too important to ignore?

<– Score

27. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the open source static code analysis tool team, open source static code analysis tool itself?

<– Score

28. Is it needed?

<– Score

29. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?

<– Score

30. Who should resolve the open source static code analysis tool issues?

<– Score

31. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying open source static code analysis tool research related to market response and models?

<– Score

32. How are training requirements identified?

<– Score

33. What do you need to start doing?

<– Score

34. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?

<– Score

35. What does open source static code analysis tool success mean to the stakeholders?

<– Score

36. Think about the people you identified for your open source static code analysis tool project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?

<– Score

37. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?

<– Score

38. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?

<– Score

39. When a open source static code analysis tool manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?

<– Score

40. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?

<– Score

41. Are there open source static code analysis tool problems defined?

<– Score

42. What is the problem or issue?

<– Score

43. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom open source static code analysis tool project?

<– Score

44. Are there recognized open source static code analysis tool problems?

<– Score

45. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate open source static code analysis tool delivery, for example is new software needed?

<– Score

46. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?

<– Score

47. Did you miss any major open source static code analysis tool issues?

<– Score

48. How do you assess your open source static code analysis tool workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?

<– Score

49. Have you identified your open source static code analysis tool key performance indicators?

<– Score

50. What are the clients issues and concerns?

<– Score

51. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?

<– Score

52. Why is this needed?

<– Score

53. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?

<– Score

54. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?

<– Score

55. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?

<– Score

56. What creative shifts do you need to take?

<– Score

57. Does your organization need more open source static code analysis tool education?

<– Score

58. How are the open source static code analysis tool’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?

<– Score

59. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective open source static code analysis tool leader?

<– Score

60. What open source static code analysis tool coordination do you need?

<– Score

61. How are you going to measure success?

<– Score

62. What needs to stay?

<– Score

63. How do you recognize an open source static code analysis tool objection?

<– Score

64. Why the need?

<– Score

65. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?

<– Score

66. What situation(s) led to this open source static code analysis tool Self Assessment?

<– Score

67. Where do you need to exercise leadership?

<– Score

68. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?

<– Score

69. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?

<– Score

70. What is the recognized need?

<– Score

71. What open source static code analysis tool problem should be solved?

<– Score

72. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?

<– Score

73. What else needs to be measured?

<– Score

74. Do you know what you need to know about open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

75. Is the quality assurance team identified?

<– Score

76. Consider your own open source static code analysis tool project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?

<– Score

77. What is the open source static code analysis tool problem definition? What do you need to resolve?

<– Score

78. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in open source static code analysis tool? In other words, what are the risks, if open source static code analysis tool does not deliver successfully?

<– Score

79. Who needs to know about open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

80. Do you need different information or graphics?

<– Score

81. What problems are you facing and how do you consider open source static code analysis tool will circumvent those obstacles?

<– Score

82. Where is training needed?

<– Score

83. What vendors make products that address the open source static code analysis tool needs?

<– Score

84. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?

<– Score

85. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?

<– Score

86. Which information does the open source static code analysis tool business case need to include?

<– Score

87. What open source static code analysis tool events should you attend?

<– Score

88. Which needs are not included or involved?

<– Score

89. What are the open source static code analysis tool resources needed?

<– Score

90. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?

<– Score

91. How many trainings, in total, are needed?

<– Score

92. Are there any revenue recognition issues?

<– Score

93. Who needs budgets?

<– Score

94. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

95. For your open source static code analysis tool project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?

<– Score

96. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?

<– Score

97. Will open source static code analysis tool deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?

<– Score

98. What do employees need in the short term?

<– Score

99. Will it solve real problems?

<– Score

100. What are the expected benefits of open source static code analysis tool to the stakeholder?

<– Score

101. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?

<– Score

102. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the open source static code analysis tool Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How can the value of open source static code analysis tool be defined?

<– Score

2. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

<– Score

3. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

<– Score

4. What open source static code analysis tool requirements should be gathered?

<– Score

5. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

<– Score

6. How do you build the right business case?

<– Score

7. What are the core elements of the open source static code analysis tool business case?

<– Score

8. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that open source static code analysis tool brings?

<– Score

9. What open source static code analysis tool services do you require?

<– Score

10. What is the scope of the open source static code analysis tool effort?

<– Score

11. How do you manage changes in open source static code analysis tool requirements?

<– Score

12. What system do you use for gathering open source static code analysis tool information?

<– Score

13. Has a open source static code analysis tool requirement not been met?

<– Score

14. Are accountability and ownership for open source static code analysis tool clearly defined?

<– Score

15. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

<– Score

16. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

<– Score

17. What is in scope?

<– Score

18. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

<– Score

19. What are the open source static code analysis tool use cases?

<– Score

20. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

<– Score

21. Is scope creep really all bad news?

<– Score

22. How will the open source static code analysis tool team and the group measure complete success of open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

23. Is special open source static code analysis tool user knowledge required?

<– Score

24. Where can you gather more information?

<– Score

25. What is the definition of success?

<– Score

26. What sort of initial information to gather?

<– Score

27. How does the open source static code analysis tool manager ensure against scope creep?

<– Score

28. When is/was the open source static code analysis tool start date?

<– Score

29. What defines best in class?

<– Score

30. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

<– Score

31. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

<– Score

32. How have you defined all open source static code analysis tool requirements first?

<– Score

33. Scope of sensitive information?

<– Score

34. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

<– Score

35. When is the estimated completion date?

<– Score

36. Is the open source static code analysis tool scope complete and appropriately sized?

<– Score

37. Are all requirements met?

<– Score

38. Has your scope been defined?

<– Score

39. What are the open source static code analysis tool tasks and definitions?

<– Score

40. Is open source static code analysis tool linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

<– Score

41. What happens if open source static code analysis tool’s scope changes?

<– Score

42. What is out-of-scope initially?

<– Score

43. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

<– Score

44. Is there a open source static code analysis tool management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

<– Score

45. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the open source static code analysis tool goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

<– Score

46. Are there different segments of customers?

<– Score

47. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

<– Score

48. Is there a critical path to deliver open source static code analysis tool results?

<– Score

49. Who approved the open source static code analysis tool scope?

<– Score

50. How would you define open source static code analysis tool leadership?

<– Score

51. How do you manage unclear open source static code analysis tool requirements?

<– Score

52. What is the context?

<– Score

53. What information should you gather?

<– Score

54. How and when will the baselines be defined?

<– Score

55. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

<– Score

56. The political context: who holds power?

<– Score

57. What knowledge or experience is required?

<– Score

58. How did the open source static code analysis tool manager receive input to the development of a open source static code analysis tool improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

<– Score

59. Have all basic functions of open source static code analysis tool been defined?

<– Score

60. Who is gathering open source static code analysis tool information?

<– Score

61. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

<– Score

62. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

<– Score

63. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

<– Score

64. Why are you doing open source static code analysis tool and what is the scope?

<– Score

65. What scope to assess?

<– Score

66. How do you hand over open source static code analysis tool context?

<– Score

67. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

<– Score

68. What is the definition of open source static code analysis tool excellence?

<– Score

69. Do you all define open source static code analysis tool in the same way?

<– Score

70. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform open source static code analysis tool work? How is the team addressing them?

<– Score

71. Has the open source static code analysis tool work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

<– Score

72. Does the scope remain the same?

<– Score

73. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

<– Score

74. Is the open source static code analysis tool scope manageable?

<– Score

75. How do you gather open source static code analysis tool requirements?

<– Score

76. How do you manage scope?

<– Score

77. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

<– Score

78. Do you have a open source static code analysis tool success story or case study ready to tell and share?

<– Score

79. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to open source static code analysis tool changes?

<– Score

80. Who are the open source static code analysis tool improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

<– Score

81. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

<– Score

82. Who is gathering information?

<– Score

83. Is open source static code analysis tool currently on schedule according to the plan?

<– Score

84. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

<– Score

85. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

<– Score

86. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

<– Score

87. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

<– Score

88. What gets examined?

<– Score

89. How often are the team meetings?

<– Score

90. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

<– Score

91. How do you gather the stories?

<– Score

92. Is the scope of open source static code analysis tool defined?

<– Score

93. How do you catch open source static code analysis tool definition inconsistencies?

<– Score

94. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

<– Score

95. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected open source static code analysis tool results are met?

<– Score

96. What is the scope of the open source static code analysis tool work?

<– Score

97. What is the worst case scenario?

<– Score

98. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

<– Score

99. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

<– Score

100. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

<– Score

101. What sources do you use to gather information for a open source static code analysis tool study?

<– Score

102. Will a open source static code analysis tool production readiness review be required?

<– Score

103. Are the open source static code analysis tool requirements testable?

<– Score

104. What are the record-keeping requirements of open source static code analysis tool activities?

<– Score

105. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

<– Score

106. What is the scope of open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

107. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

<– Score

108. Are task requirements clearly defined?

<– Score

109. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

<– Score

110. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does open source static code analysis tool leverage and how?

<– Score

111. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

<– Score

112. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

<– Score

113. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

<– Score

114. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

<– Score

115. What intelligence can you gather?

<– Score

116. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

<– Score

117. What was the context?

<– Score

118. What would be the goal or target for a open source static code analysis tool’s improvement team?

<– Score

119. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

<– Score

120. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<– Score

121. Are resources adequate for the scope?

<– Score

122. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

<– Score

123. How do you gather requirements?

<– Score

124. Is there a clear open source static code analysis tool case definition?

<– Score

125. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

<– Score

126. Does the team have regular meetings?

<– Score

127. What is out of scope?

<– Score

128. What are (control) requirements for open source static code analysis tool Information?

<– Score

129. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

130. Has the direction changed at all during the course of open source static code analysis tool? If so, when did it change and why?

<– Score

131. Are the open source static code analysis tool requirements complete?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the open source static code analysis tool Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How sensitive must the open source static code analysis tool strategy be to cost?

<– Score

2. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?

<– Score

3. How can you measure the performance?

<– Score

4. How frequently do you verify your open source static code analysis tool strategy?

<– Score

5. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?

<– Score

6. How will you measure success?

<– Score

7. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

<– Score

8. What does losing customers cost your organization?

<– Score

9. What could cause you to change course?

<– Score

10. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

<– Score

11. How much does it cost?

<– Score

12. Which costs should be taken into account?

<– Score

13. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?

<– Score

14. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?

<– Score

15. What are the costs and benefits?

<– Score

16. What does a Test Case verify?

<– Score

17. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

<– Score

18. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

<– Score

19. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

<– Score

20. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?

<– Score

21. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

<– Score

22. Have design-to-cost goals been established?

<– Score

23. Which open source static code analysis tool impacts are significant?

<– Score

24. What evidence is there and what is measured?

<– Score

25. How do you verify and validate the open source static code analysis tool data?

<– Score

26. What is the open source static code analysis tool business impact?

<– Score

27. How frequently do you track open source static code analysis tool measures?

<– Score

28. How can you manage cost down?

<– Score

29. How are costs allocated?

<– Score

30. What could cause delays in the schedule?

<– Score

31. Who pays the cost?

<– Score

32. What are the costs of reform?

<– Score

33. What are the operational costs after open source static code analysis tool deployment?

<– Score

34. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

<– Score

35. How do you verify performance?

<– Score

36. At what cost?

<– Score

37. Does a open source static code analysis tool quantification method exist?

<– Score

38. What is the cause of any open source static code analysis tool gaps?

<– Score

39. Are there competing open source static code analysis tool priorities?

<– Score

40. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

<– Score

41. What causes extra work or rework?

<– Score

42. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?

<– Score

43. What are you verifying?

<– Score

44. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

<– Score

45. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?

<– Score

46. What are the current costs of the open source static code analysis tool process?

<– Score

47. What does verifying compliance entail?

<– Score

48. What causes mismanagement?

<– Score

49. Where can you go to verify the info?

<– Score

50. Do you have any cost open source static code analysis tool limitation requirements?

<– Score

51. What are the open source static code analysis tool key cost drivers?

<– Score

52. What causes investor action?

<– Score

53. Are the open source static code analysis tool benefits worth its costs?

<– Score

54. What do people want to verify?

<– Score

55. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

<– Score

56. Who is involved in verifying compliance?

<– Score

57. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?

<– Score

58. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

<– Score

59. How is the value delivered by open source static code analysis tool being measured?

<– Score

60. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?

<– Score

61. How will costs be allocated?

<– Score

62. Is the solution cost-effective?

<– Score

63. How do you verify your resources?

<– Score

64. What are hidden open source static code analysis tool quality costs?

<– Score

65. What would it cost to replace your technology?

<– Score

66. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?

<– Score

67. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

<– Score

68. How to cause the change?

<– Score

69. How do you verify the open source static code analysis tool requirements quality?

<– Score

70. What are the open source static code analysis tool investment costs?

<– Score

71. How will success or failure be measured?

<– Score

72. What are the costs of delaying open source static code analysis tool action?

<– Score

73. Have you included everything in your open source static code analysis tool cost models?

<– Score

74. How will your organization measure success?

<– Score

75. How is performance measured?

<– Score

76. How do you measure success?

<– Score

77. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?

<– Score

78. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?

<– Score

79. How is progress measured?

<– Score

80. How are measurements made?

<– Score

81. What measurements are being captured?

<– Score

82. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to open source static code analysis tool? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?

<– Score

83. Are open source static code analysis tool vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?

<– Score

84. What users will be impacted?

<– Score

85. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?

<– Score

86. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

<– Score

87. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?

<– Score

88. How do you measure variability?

<– Score

89. How will you measure your open source static code analysis tool effectiveness?

<– Score

90. What can be used to verify compliance?

<– Score

91. How do you measure efficient delivery of open source static code analysis tool services?

<– Score

92. What harm might be caused?

<– Score

93. What is an unallowable cost?

<– Score

94. What does your operating model cost?

<– Score

95. What is measured? Why?

<– Score

96. Are the units of measure consistent?

<– Score

97. Why a open source static code analysis tool focus?

<– Score

98. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?

<– Score

99. What are allowable costs?

<– Score

100. Has a cost center been established?

<– Score

101. How do your measurements capture actionable open source static code analysis tool information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?

<– Score

102. How can you measure open source static code analysis tool in a systematic way?

<– Score

103. How are you verifying it?

<– Score

104. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent open source static code analysis tool services/products?

<– Score

105. Are the measurements objective?

<– Score

106. What is the total cost related to deploying open source static code analysis tool, including any consulting or professional services?

<– Score

107. Does management have the right priorities among projects?

<– Score

108. What do you measure and why?

<– Score

109. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?

<– Score

110. Are missed open source static code analysis tool opportunities costing your organization money?

<– Score

111. How do you measure lifecycle phases?

<– Score

112. What would be a real cause for concern?

<– Score

113. Does the open source static code analysis tool task fit the client’s priorities?

<– Score

114. What are your customers expectations and measures?

<– Score

115. Is a follow-up focused external open source static code analysis tool review required?

<– Score

116. What tests verify requirements?

<– Score

117. What potential environmental factors impact the open source static code analysis tool effort?

<– Score

118. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

<– Score

119. Who should receive measurement reports?

<– Score

120. What are your key open source static code analysis tool organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?

<– Score

121. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?

<– Score

122. What is your decision requirements diagram?

<– Score

123. What is the total fixed cost?

<– Score

124. What are the costs?

<– Score

125. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?

<– Score

126. What drives O&M cost?

<– Score

127. What is the cost of rework?

<– Score

128. What are the types and number of measures to use?

<– Score

129. How can a open source static code analysis tool test verify your ideas or assumptions?

<– Score

130. Are there measurements based on task performance?

<– Score

131. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger open source static code analysis tool results?

<– Score

132. What are the strategic priorities for this year?

<– Score

133. Are you able to realize any cost savings?

<– Score

134. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

<– Score

135. How will effects be measured?

<– Score

136. Which measures and indicators matter?

<– Score

137. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the open source static code analysis tool Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:

INTENT: Analyze causes, assumptions and hypotheses.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How do you define collaboration and team output?

<– Score

2. How much data can be collected in the given timeframe?

<– Score

3. What types of data do your open source static code analysis tool indicators require?

<– Score

4. How is open source static code analysis tool data gathered?

<– Score

5. Is the gap/opportunity displayed and communicated in financial terms?

<– Score

6. Is there any way to speed up the process?

<– Score

7. Who is involved in the management review process?

<– Score

8. What quality tools were used to get through the analyze phase?

<– Score

9. How does the organization define, manage, and improve its open source static code analysis tool processes?

<– Score

10. What tools were used to generate the list of possible causes?

<– Score

11. Is there an established change management process?

<– Score

12. Is the performance gap determined?

<– Score

13. What tools were used to narrow the list of possible causes?

<– Score

14. Has an output goal been set?

<– Score

15. How do you implement and manage your work processes to ensure that they meet design requirements?

<– Score

16. What are the revised rough estimates of the financial savings/opportunity for open source static code analysis tool improvements?

<– Score

17. A compounding model resolution with available relevant data can often provide insight towards a solution methodology; which open source static code analysis tool models, tools and techniques are necessary?

<– Score

18. Are you missing open source static code analysis tool opportunities?

<– Score

19. Do your employees have the opportunity to do what they do best everyday?

<– Score

20. Have the problem and goal statements been updated to reflect the additional knowledge gained from the analyze phase?

<– Score

21. Do staff qualifications match your project?

<– Score

22. Is the open source static code analysis tool process severely broken such that a re-design is necessary?

<– Score

23. Is the required open source static code analysis tool data gathered?

<– Score

24. Do you have the authority to produce the output?

<– Score

25. What open source static code analysis tool data should be managed?

<– Score

26. Are open source static code analysis tool changes recognized early enough to be approved through the regular process?

<– Score

27. What were the crucial ‘moments of truth’ on the process map?

<– Score

28. What are your open source static code analysis tool processes?

<– Score

29. Were Pareto charts (or similar) used to portray the ‘heavy hitters’ (or key sources of variation)?

<– Score

30. Was a cause-and-effect diagram used to explore the different types of causes (or sources of variation)?

<– Score

31. Where is the data coming from to measure compliance?

<– Score

32. How difficult is it to qualify what open source static code analysis tool ROI is?

<– Score

33. How will the change process be managed?

<– Score

34. How will the open source static code analysis tool data be captured?

<– Score

35. How do you ensure that the open source static code analysis tool opportunity is realistic?

<– Score

36. What do you need to qualify?

<– Score

37. Have you defined which data is gathered how?

<– Score

38. Are your outputs consistent?

<– Score

39. What qualifies as competition?

<– Score

40. What are the open source static code analysis tool business drivers?

<– Score

41. How was the detailed process map generated, verified, and validated?

<– Score

42. What is the Value Stream Mapping?

<– Score

43. Who owns what data?

<– Score

44. Has data output been validated?

<– Score

45. What were the financial benefits resulting from any ‘ground fruit or low-hanging fruit’ (quick fixes)?

<– Score

46. Do several people in different organizational units assist with the open source static code analysis tool process?

<– Score

47. How many input/output points does it require?

<– Score

48. Do you, as a leader, bounce back quickly from setbacks?

<– Score

49. What other organizational variables, such as reward systems or communication systems, affect the performance of this open source static code analysis tool process?

<– Score

50. How is the way you as the leader think and process information affecting your organizational culture?

<– Score

51. What are the necessary qualifications?

<– Score

52. How do you measure the operational performance of your key work systems and processes, including productivity, cycle time, and other appropriate measures of process effectiveness, efficiency, and innovation?

<– Score

53. What systems/processes must you excel at?

<– Score

54. What is the open source static code analysis tool Driver?

<– Score

55. What are your current levels and trends in key measures or indicators of open source static code analysis tool product and process performance that are important to and directly serve your customers? How do these results compare with the performance of your competitors and other organizations with similar offerings?

<– Score

56. Identify an operational issue in your organization, for example, could a particular task be done more quickly or more efficiently by open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

57. What are your key performance measures or indicators and in-process measures for the control and improvement of your open source static code analysis tool processes?

<– Score

58. How has the open source static code analysis tool data been gathered?

<– Score

59. What are the disruptive open source static code analysis tool technologies that enable your organization to radically change your business processes?

<– Score

60. What open source static code analysis tool metrics are outputs of the process?

<– Score

61. What is the cost of poor quality as supported by the team’s analysis?

<– Score

62. How is data used for program management and improvement?

<– Score

63. What is the oversight process?

<– Score

64. Was a detailed process map created to amplify critical steps of the ‘as is’ stakeholder process?

<– Score

65. How do you promote understanding that opportunity for improvement is not criticism of the status quo, or the people who created the status quo?

<– Score

66. What does the data say about the performance of the stakeholder process?

<– Score

67. Should you invest in industry-recognized qualifications?

<– Score

68. How often will data be collected for measures?

<– Score

69. What qualifications are needed?

<– Score

70. What successful thing are you doing today that may be blinding you to new growth opportunities?

<– Score

71. How do you identify specific open source static code analysis tool investment opportunities and emerging trends?

<– Score

72. What are the open source static code analysis tool design outputs?

<– Score

73. How will the data be checked for quality?

<– Score

74. What internal processes need improvement?

<– Score

75. Is the suppliers process defined and controlled?

<– Score

76. What will drive open source static code analysis tool change?

<– Score

77. What is the output?

<– Score

78. Do quality systems drive continuous improvement?

<– Score

79. Where can you get qualified talent today?

<– Score

80. How do you use open source static code analysis tool data and information to support organizational decision making and innovation?

<– Score

81. What are your best practices for minimizing open source static code analysis tool project risk, while demonstrating incremental value and quick wins throughout the open source static code analysis tool project lifecycle?

<– Score

82. How do your work systems and key work processes relate to and capitalize on your core competencies?

<– Score

83. What qualifications do open source static code analysis tool leaders need?

<– Score

84. What open source static code analysis tool data will be collected?

<– Score

85. Is data and process analysis, root cause analysis and quantifying the gap/opportunity in place?

<– Score

86. What are the best opportunities for value improvement?

<– Score

87. Who gets your output?

<– Score

88. What information qualified as important?

<– Score

89. Do your contracts/agreements contain data security obligations?

<– Score

90. What process should you select for improvement?

<– Score

91. Have any additional benefits been identified that will result from closing all or most of the gaps?

<– Score

92. What training and qualifications will you need?

<– Score

93. What, related to, open source static code analysis tool processes does your organization outsource?

<– Score

94. Is pre-qualification of suppliers carried out?

<– Score

95. What are the personnel training and qualifications required?

<– Score

96. Think about some of the processes you undertake within your organization, which do you own?

<– Score

97. Which open source static code analysis tool data should be retained?

<– Score

98. What is your organizations system for selecting qualified vendors?

<– Score

99. When should a process be art not science?

<– Score

100. What data is gathered?

<– Score

101. What are your current levels and trends in key open source static code analysis tool measures or indicators of product and process performance that are important to and directly serve your customers?

<– Score

102. Who will facilitate the team and process?

<– Score

103. Do your leaders quickly bounce back from setbacks?

<– Score

104. Were any designed experiments used to generate additional insight into the data analysis?

<– Score

105. What qualifications and skills do you need?

<– Score

106. Do you understand your management processes today?

<– Score

107. Did any value-added analysis or ‘lean thinking’ take place to identify some of the gaps shown on the ‘as is’ process map?

<– Score

108. What output to create?

<– Score

109. What controls do you have in place to protect data?

<– Score

110. What resources go in to get the desired output?

<– Score

111. What are evaluation criteria for the output?

<– Score

112. Where is open source static code analysis tool data gathered?

<– Score

113. What conclusions were drawn from the team’s data collection and analysis? How did the team reach these conclusions?

<– Score

114. Can you add value to the current open source static code analysis tool decision-making process (largely qualitative) by incorporating uncertainty modeling (more quantitative)?

<– Score

115. What qualifications are necessary?

<– Score

116. How is the data gathered?

<– Score

117. How will corresponding data be collected?

<– Score

118. Is there a strict change management process?

<– Score

119. Are all staff in core open source static code analysis tool subjects Highly Qualified?

<– Score

120. Record-keeping requirements flow from the records needed as inputs, outputs, controls and for transformation of a open source static code analysis tool process, are the records needed as inputs to the open source static code analysis tool process available?

<– Score

121. What open source static code analysis tool data do you gather or use now?

<– Score

122. Who is involved with workflow mapping?

<– Score

123. How do mission and objectives affect the open source static code analysis tool processes of your organization?

<– Score

124. What did the team gain from developing a sub-process map?

<– Score

125. How can risk management be tied procedurally to process elements?

<– Score

126. What are the processes for audit reporting and management?

<– Score

127. Are all team members qualified for all tasks?

<– Score

128. Were there any improvement opportunities identified from the process analysis?

<– Score

129. Is the final output clearly identified?

<– Score

130. What other jobs or tasks affect the performance of the steps in the open source static code analysis tool process?

<– Score

131. Think about the functions involved in your open source static code analysis tool project, what processes flow from these functions?

<– Score

132. What are your outputs?

<– Score

133. An organizationally feasible system request is one that considers the mission, goals and objectives of the organization, key questions are: is the open source static code analysis tool solution request practical and will it solve a problem or take advantage of an opportunity to achieve company goals?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the open source static code analysis tool Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #5: IMPROVE:

INTENT: Develop a practical solution. Innovate, establish and test the solution and to measure the results.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Is the open source static code analysis tool solution sustainable?

<– Score

2. What are the expected open source static code analysis tool results?

<– Score

3. How will you know that a change is an improvement?

<– Score

4. Who should make the open source static code analysis tool decisions?

<– Score

5. Is the scope clearly documented?

<– Score

6. What area needs the greatest improvement?

<– Score

7. Are the most efficient solutions problem-specific?

<– Score

8. Where do the open source static code analysis tool decisions reside?

<– Score

9. What practices helps your organization to develop its capacity to recognize patterns?

<– Score

10. Are risk triggers captured?

<– Score

11. What are the open source static code analysis tool security risks?

<– Score

12. How do the open source static code analysis tool results compare with the performance of your competitors and other organizations with similar offerings?

<– Score

13. For decision problems, how do you develop a decision statement?

<– Score

14. When you map the key players in your own work and the types/domains of relationships with them, which relationships do you find easy and which challenging, and why?

<– Score

15. How do you define the solutions’ scope?

<– Score

16. What are the affordable open source static code analysis tool risks?

<– Score

17. Would you develop a open source static code analysis tool Communication Strategy?

<– Score

18. How will you know when its improved?

<– Score

19. How will you recognize and celebrate results?

<– Score

20. What open source static code analysis tool improvements can be made?

<– Score

21. How do you measure risk?

<– Score

22. Which open source static code analysis tool solution is appropriate?

<– Score

23. Who are the open source static code analysis tool decision makers?

<– Score

24. What were the criteria for evaluating a open source static code analysis tool pilot?

<– Score

25. What are the concrete open source static code analysis tool results?

<– Score

26. How do you improve productivity?

<– Score

27. What alternative responses are available to manage risk?

<– Score

28. How can you improve open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

29. Can the solution be designed and implemented within an acceptable time period?

<– Score

30. Does the goal represent a desired result that can be measured?

<– Score

31. What current systems have to be understood and/or changed?

<– Score

32. How are open source static code analysis tool risks managed?

<– Score

33. Have you identified breakpoints and/or risk tolerances that will trigger broad consideration of a potential need for intervention or modification of strategy?

<– Score

34. Explorations of the frontiers of open source static code analysis tool will help you build influence, improve open source static code analysis tool, optimize decision making, and sustain change, what is your approach?

<– Score

35. What to do with the results or outcomes of measurements?

<– Score

36. How do you measure improved open source static code analysis tool service perception, and satisfaction?

<– Score

37. How do you go about comparing open source static code analysis tool approaches/solutions?

<– Score

38. Do you need to do a usability evaluation?

<– Score

39. Can you integrate quality management and risk management?

<– Score

40. Are the risks fully understood, reasonable and manageable?

<– Score

41. What went well, what should change, what can improve?

<– Score

42. Are risk management tasks balanced centrally and locally?

<– Score

43. Do you have any automated system to report new warnings to developers?

<– Score

44. What is the open source static code analysis tool’s sustainability risk?

<– Score

45. Is the open source static code analysis tool documentation thorough?

<– Score

46. How do you decide how much to remunerate an employee?

<– Score

47. Risk events: what are the things that could go wrong?

<– Score

48. In the past few months, what is the smallest change you have made that has had the biggest positive result? What was it about that small change that produced the large return?

<– Score

49. How do you keep improving open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

50. How can you better manage risk?

<– Score

51. Was a open source static code analysis tool charter developed?

<– Score

52. How do you provide feedback to developers on coding styles or feature implementation?

<– Score

53. What is the magnitude of the improvements?

<– Score

54. What do you want to improve?

<– Score

55. What should a proof of concept or pilot accomplish?

<– Score

56. How significant is the improvement in the eyes of the end user?

<– Score

57. Who makes the open source static code analysis tool decisions in your organization?

<– Score

58. open source static code analysis tool risk decisions: whose call Is It?

<– Score

59. Will the controls trigger any other risks?

<– Score

60. Is open source static code analysis tool documentation maintained?

<– Score

61. Does a good decision guarantee a good outcome?

<– Score

62. What are the implications of the one critical open source static code analysis tool decision 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years from now?

<– Score

63. Can you identify any significant risks or exposures to open source static code analysis tool third- parties (vendors, service providers, alliance partners etc) that concern you?

<– Score

64. What is open source static code analysis tool risk?

<– Score

65. What criteria will you use to assess your open source static code analysis tool risks?

<– Score

66. What tools were used to evaluate the potential solutions?

<– Score

67. Where do you need open source static code analysis tool improvement?

<– Score

68. Do you cover the five essential competencies: Communication, Collaboration,Innovation, Adaptability, and Leadership that improve an organizations ability to leverage the new open source static code analysis tool in a volatile global economy?

<– Score

69. What assumptions are made about the solution and approach?

<– Score

70. What actually has to improve and by how much?

<– Score

71. Who will be using the results of the measurement activities?

<– Score

72. Is the measure of success for open source static code analysis tool understandable to a variety of people?

<– Score

73. Is any open source static code analysis tool documentation required?

<– Score

74. What is the risk?

<– Score

75. Do vendor agreements bring new compliance risk ?

<– Score

76. Are you assessing open source static code analysis tool and risk?

<– Score

77. How do you deal with open source static code analysis tool risk?

<– Score

78. Why improve in the first place?

<– Score

79. If you could go back in time five years, what decision would you make differently? What is your best guess as to what decision you’re making today you might regret five years from now?

<– Score

80. Is supporting open source static code analysis tool documentation required?

<– Score

81. What lessons, if any, from a pilot were incorporated into the design of the full-scale solution?

<– Score

82. How can skill-level changes improve open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

83. What resources are required for the improvement efforts?

<– Score

84. What risks do you need to manage?

<– Score

85. How do you manage open source static code analysis tool risk?

<– Score

86. Do you have the optimal project management team structure?

<– Score

87. What tools were most useful during the improve phase?

<– Score

88. At what point will vulnerability assessments be performed once open source static code analysis tool is put into production (e.g., ongoing Risk Management after implementation)?

<– Score

89. How do you improve your likelihood of success ?

<– Score

90. How do you link measurement and risk?

<– Score

91. How does your organization evaluate strategic open source static code analysis tool success?

<– Score

92. Have you achieved open source static code analysis tool improvements?

<– Score

93. How are policy decisions made and where?

<– Score

94. What are your current levels and trends in key measures or indicators of workforce and leader development?

<– Score

95. How is continuous improvement applied to risk management?

<– Score

96. How can you improve performance?

<– Score

97. Is risk periodically assessed?

<– Score

98. Who will be responsible for documenting the open source static code analysis tool requirements in detail?

<– Score

99. Are decisions made in a timely manner?

<– Score

100. Is the solution technically practical?

<– Score

101. How scalable is your open source static code analysis tool solution?

<– Score

102. What were the underlying assumptions on the cost-benefit analysis?

<– Score

103. To what extent does management recognize open source static code analysis tool as a tool to increase the results?

<– Score

104. Is the open source static code analysis tool risk managed?

<– Score

105. How do you mitigate open source static code analysis tool risk?

<– Score

106. Who do you report open source static code analysis tool results to?

<– Score

107. How can the phases of open source static code analysis tool development be identified?

<– Score

108. Are the key business and technology risks being managed?

<– Score

109. Risk factors: what are the characteristics of open source static code analysis tool that make it risky?

<– Score

110. How do you improve open source static code analysis tool service perception, and satisfaction?

<– Score

111. How will you know that you have improved?

<– Score

112. Is there any other open source static code analysis tool solution?

<– Score

113. Who manages open source static code analysis tool risk?

<– Score

114. What tools were used to tap into the creativity and encourage ‘outside the box’ thinking?

<– Score

115. How is knowledge sharing about risk management improved?

<– Score

116. How do you manage and improve your open source static code analysis tool work systems to deliver customer value and achieve organizational success and sustainability?

<– Score

117. Do you combine technical expertise with business knowledge and open source static code analysis tool Key topics include lifecycles, development approaches, requirements and how to make a business case?

<– Score

118. Who manages supplier risk management in your organization?

<– Score

119. Do those selected for the open source static code analysis tool team have a good general understanding of what open source static code analysis tool is all about?

<– Score

120. Who are the open source static code analysis tool decision-makers?

<– Score

121. How risky is your organization?

<– Score

122. Who will be responsible for making the decisions to include or exclude requested changes once open source static code analysis tool is underway?

<– Score

123. Are procedures documented for managing open source static code analysis tool risks?

<– Score

124. How does the team improve its work?

<– Score

125. Are events managed to resolution?

<– Score

126. Who controls key decisions that will be made?

<– Score

127. How will you measure the results?

<– Score

128. How do you measure progress and evaluate training effectiveness?

<– Score

129. Risk Identification: What are the possible risk events your organization faces in relation to open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

130. What is the team’s contingency plan for potential problems occurring in implementation?

<– Score

131. Who are the key stakeholders for the open source static code analysis tool evaluation?

<– Score

132. What improvements have been achieved?

<– Score

133. Is there a high likelihood that any recommendations will achieve their intended results?

<– Score

134. What tools do you use once you have decided on a open source static code analysis tool strategy and more importantly how do you choose?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the open source static code analysis tool Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #6: CONTROL:

INTENT: Implement the practical solution. Maintain the performance and correct possible complications.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. What is the recommended frequency of auditing?

<– Score

2. You may have created your quality measures at a time when you lacked resources, technology wasn’t up to the required standard, or low service levels were the industry norm. Have those circumstances changed?

<– Score

3. What should the next improvement project be that is related to open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

4. Who is the open source static code analysis tool process owner?

<– Score

5. Who is going to spread your message?

<– Score

6. How do you select, collect, align, and integrate open source static code analysis tool data and information for tracking daily operations and overall organizational performance, including progress relative to strategic objectives and action plans?

<– Score

7. What do your reports reflect?

<– Score

8. What can you control?

<– Score

9. Will existing staff require re-training, for example, to learn new business processes?

<– Score

10. What is the standard for acceptable open source static code analysis tool performance?

<– Score

11. Does a troubleshooting guide exist or is it needed?

<– Score

12. How likely is the current open source static code analysis tool plan to come in on schedule or on budget?

<– Score

13. Is reporting being used or needed?

<– Score

14. Who has control over resources?

<– Score

15. What are the critical parameters to watch?

<– Score

16. What other areas of the group might benefit from the open source static code analysis tool team’s improvements, knowledge, and learning?

<– Score

17. How might the group capture best practices and lessons learned so as to leverage improvements?

<– Score

18. Are documented procedures clear and easy to follow for the operators?

<– Score

19. How will report readings be checked to effectively monitor performance?

<– Score

20. Are the open source static code analysis tool standards challenging?

<– Score

21. Act/Adjust: What Do you Need to Do Differently?

<– Score

22. Does open source static code analysis tool appropriately measure and monitor risk?

<– Score

23. Is there a open source static code analysis tool Communication plan covering who needs to get what information when?

<– Score

24. How do you establish and deploy modified action plans if circumstances require a shift in plans and rapid execution of new plans?

<– Score

25. Who sets the open source static code analysis tool standards?

<– Score

26. How widespread is its use?

<– Score

27. Is new knowledge gained imbedded in the response plan?

<– Score

28. What are customers monitoring?

<– Score

29. How do you spread information?

<– Score

30. What do you measure to verify effectiveness gains?

<– Score

31. How will the day-to-day responsibilities for monitoring and continual improvement be transferred from the improvement team to the process owner?

<– Score

32. How do senior leaders actions reflect a commitment to the organizations open source static code analysis tool values?

<– Score

33. Are controls in place and consistently applied?

<– Score

34. Is knowledge gained on process shared and institutionalized?

<– Score

35. What are your results for key measures or indicators of the accomplishment of your open source static code analysis tool strategy and action plans, including building and strengthening core competencies?

<– Score

36. Has the open source static code analysis tool value of standards been quantified?

<– Score

37. Do you monitor the open source static code analysis tool decisions made and fine tune them as they evolve?

<– Score

38. What should you measure to verify efficiency gains?

<– Score

39. What is the control/monitoring plan?

<– Score

40. Can support from partners be adjusted?

<– Score

41. Will your goals reflect your program budget?

<– Score

42. What are the key elements of your open source static code analysis tool performance improvement system, including your evaluation, organizational learning, and innovation processes?

<– Score

43. Is there an action plan in case of emergencies?

<– Score

44. How can you best use all of your knowledge repositories to enhance learning and sharing?

<– Score

45. How will input, process, and output variables be checked to detect for sub-optimal conditions?

<– Score

46. Is there a transfer of ownership and knowledge to process owner and process team tasked with the responsibilities.

<– Score

47. What open source static code analysis tool standards are applicable?

<– Score

48. Is there a control plan in place for sustaining improvements (short and long-term)?

<– Score

49. What are you attempting to measure/monitor?

<– Score

50. Has the improved process and its steps been standardized?

<– Score

51. Where do ideas that reach policy makers and planners as proposals for open source static code analysis tool strengthening and reform actually originate?

<– Score

52. Are suggested corrective/restorative actions indicated on the response plan for known causes to problems that might surface?

<– Score

53. Can you adapt and adjust to changing open source static code analysis tool situations?

<– Score

54. What are the known security controls?

<– Score

55. Will the team be available to assist members in planning investigations?

<– Score

56. Have new or revised work instructions resulted?

<– Score

57. Who will be in control?

<– Score

58. Does the response plan contain a definite closed loop continual improvement scheme (e.g., plan-do-check-act)?

<– Score

59. How will you measure your QA plan’s effectiveness?

<– Score

60. What adjustments to the strategies are needed?

<– Score

61. Is there a recommended audit plan for routine surveillance inspections of open source static code analysis tool’s gains?

<– Score

62. Do the viable solutions scale to future needs?

<– Score

63. Do the open source static code analysis tool decisions you make today help people and the planet tomorrow?

<– Score

64. How do you monitor usage and cost?

<– Score

65. How will the process owner verify improvement in present and future sigma levels, process capabilities?

<– Score

66. What is your theory of human motivation, and how does your compensation plan fit with that view?

<– Score

67. How do you encourage people to take control and responsibility?

<– Score

68. Do you monitor the effectiveness of your open source static code analysis tool activities?

<– Score

69. Is the open source static code analysis tool test/monitoring cost justified?

<– Score

70. Is there a documented and implemented monitoring plan?

<– Score

71. How do your controls stack up?

<– Score

72. Are new process steps, standards, and documentation ingrained into normal operations?

<– Score

73. What quality tools were useful in the control phase?

<– Score

74. What are the performance and scale of the open source static code analysis tool tools?

<– Score

75. What do you stand for—and what are you against?

<– Score

76. Are there documented procedures?

<– Score

77. What is your plan to assess your security risks?

<– Score

78. Is there documentation that will support the successful operation of the improvement?

<– Score

79. Implementation Planning: is a pilot needed to test the changes before a full roll out occurs?

<– Score

80. How is open source static code analysis tool project cost planned, managed, monitored?

<– Score

81. Is there a standardized process?

<– Score

82. Does the open source static code analysis tool performance meet the customer’s requirements?

<– Score

83. How will the process owner and team be able to hold the gains?

<– Score

84. How will new or emerging customer needs/requirements be checked/communicated to orient the process toward meeting the new specifications and continually reducing variation?

<– Score

85. Are pertinent alerts monitored, analyzed and distributed to appropriate personnel?

<– Score

86. Against what alternative is success being measured?

<– Score

87. Is a response plan established and deployed?

<– Score

88. Is a response plan in place for when the input, process, or output measures indicate an ‘out-of-control’ condition?

<– Score

89. Who controls critical resources?

<– Score

90. How is change control managed?

<– Score

91. Does job training on the documented procedures need to be part of the process team’s education and training?

<– Score

92. How do controls support value?

<– Score

93. What key inputs and outputs are being measured on an ongoing basis?

<– Score

94. In the case of a open source static code analysis tool project, the criteria for the audit derive from implementation objectives, an audit of a open source static code analysis tool project involves assessing whether the recommendations outlined for implementation have been met, can you track that any open source static code analysis tool project is implemented as planned, and is it working?

<– Score

95. How do you plan on providing proper recognition and disclosure of supporting companies?

<– Score

96. What other systems, operations, processes, and infrastructures (hiring practices, staffing, training, incentives/rewards, metrics/dashboards/scorecards, etc.) need updates, additions, changes, or deletions in order to facilitate knowledge transfer and improvements?

<– Score

97. How do you plan for the cost of succession?

<– Score

98. What is the best design framework for open source static code analysis tool organization now that, in a post industrial-age if the top-down, command and control model is no longer relevant?

<– Score

99. Will any special training be provided for results interpretation?

<– Score

100. Are operating procedures consistent?

<– Score

101. Are the planned controls in place?

<– Score

102. Are you measuring, monitoring and predicting open source static code analysis tool activities to optimize operations and profitability, and enhancing outcomes?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the open source static code analysis tool Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

CRITERION #7: SUSTAIN:

INTENT: Retain the benefits.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Is maximizing open source static code analysis tool protection the same as minimizing open source static code analysis tool loss?

<– Score

2. If your customer were your grandmother, would you tell her to buy what you’re selling?

<– Score

3. Are there any activities that you can take off your to do list?

<– Score

4. What are your most important goals for the strategic open source static code analysis tool objectives?

<– Score

5. Think of your open source static code analysis tool project, what are the main functions?

<– Score

6. Are all key stakeholders present at all Structured Walkthroughs?

<– Score

7. How much contingency will be available in the budget?

<– Score

8. What trouble can you get into?

<– Score

9. What is the source of the strategies for open source static code analysis tool strengthening and reform?

<– Score

10. What unique value proposition (UVP) do you offer?

<– Score

11. Who will manage the integration of tools?

<– Score

12. Who else should you help?

<– Score

13. How do you cross-sell and up-sell your open source static code analysis tool success?

<– Score

14. How do you track customer value, profitability or financial return, organizational success, and sustainability?

<– Score

15. Do you think open source static code analysis tool accomplishes the goals you expect it to accomplish?

<– Score

16. What knowledge, skills and characteristics mark a good open source static code analysis tool project manager?

<– Score

17. How do you ensure that implementations of open source static code analysis tool products are done in a way that ensures safety?

<– Score

18. What projects are going on in the organization today, and what resources are those projects using from the resource pools?

<– Score

19. What trophy do you want on your mantle?

<– Score

20. What open source static code analysis tool modifications can you make work for you?

<– Score

21. What is the overall talent health of your organization as a whole at senior levels, and for each organization reporting to a member of the Senior Leadership Team?

<– Score

22. Who do you think the world wants your organization to be?

<– Score

23. Are you making progress, and are you making progress as open source static code analysis tool leaders?

<– Score

24. How does open source static code analysis tool integrate with other stakeholder initiatives?

<– Score

25. What one word do you want to own in the minds of your customers, employees, and partners?

<– Score

26. What are the barriers to increased open source static code analysis tool production?

<– Score

27. Did your employees make progress today?

<– Score

28. How do you transition from the baseline to the target?

<– Score

29. Is there any existing open source static code analysis tool governance structure?

<– Score

30. Were lessons learned captured and communicated?

<– Score

31. Do you know what you are doing? And who do you call if you don’t?

<– Score

32. Is there any reason to believe the opposite of my current belief?

<– Score

33. Who is on the team?

<– Score

34. If you had to rebuild your organization without any traditional competitive advantages (i.e., no killer technology, promising research, innovative product/service delivery model, etcetera), how would your people have to approach their work and collaborate together in order to create the necessary conditions for success?

<– Score

35. How do you manage open source static code analysis tool Knowledge Management (KM)?

<– Score

36. Can you maintain your growth without detracting from the factors that have contributed to your success?

<– Score

37. How will you know that the open source static code analysis tool project has been successful?

<– Score

38. Are you relevant? Will you be relevant five years from now? Ten?

<– Score

39. Are the assumptions believable and achievable?

<– Score

40. How can you become more high-tech but still be high touch?

<– Score

41. What could happen if you do not do it?

<– Score

42. Whose voice (department, ethnic group, women, older workers, etc) might you have missed hearing from in your company, and how might you amplify this voice to create positive momentum for your business?

<– Score

43. Is a open source static code analysis tool breakthrough on the horizon?

<– Score

44. In a project to restructure open source static code analysis tool outcomes, which stakeholders would you involve?

<– Score

45. Why should you adopt a open source static code analysis tool framework?

<– Score

46. What will be the consequences to the stakeholder (financial, reputation etc) if open source static code analysis tool does not go ahead or fails to deliver the objectives?

<– Score

47. What relationships among open source static code analysis tool trends do you perceive?

<– Score

48. Who do you want your customers to become?

<– Score

49. If you were responsible for initiating and implementing major changes in your organization, what steps might you take to ensure acceptance of those changes?

<– Score

50. Why will customers want to buy your organizations products/services?

<– Score

51. What goals did you miss?

<– Score

52. What did the code look like at time or version X?

<– Score

53. What happens at your organization when people fail?

<– Score

54. Who will provide the final approval of open source static code analysis tool deliverables?

<– Score

55. Who are your customers?

<– Score

56. In the past year, what have you done (or could you have done) to increase the accurate perception of your company/brand as ethical and honest?

<– Score

57. Why not do open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

58. What is the funding source for this project?

<– Score

59. What is your open source static code analysis tool strategy?

<– Score

60. What is the estimated value of the project?

<– Score

61. When information truly is ubiquitous, when reach and connectivity are completely global, when computing resources are infinite, and when a whole new set of impossibilities are not only possible, but happening, what will that do to your business?

<– Score

62. Is open source static code analysis tool realistic, or are you setting yourself up for failure?

<– Score

63. Instead of going to current contacts for new ideas, what if you reconnected with dormant contacts—the people you used to know? If you were going reactivate a dormant tie, who would it be?

<– Score

64. Do you have enough freaky customers in your portfolio pushing you to the limit day in and day out?

<– Score

65. Operational - will it work?

<– Score

66. Have benefits been optimized with all key stakeholders?

<– Score

67. What did you miss in the interview for the worst hire you ever made?

<– Score

68. What is the big open source static code analysis tool idea?

<– Score

69. Who will be responsible for deciding whether open source static code analysis tool goes ahead or not after the initial investigations?

<– Score

70. How do you maintain open source static code analysis tool’s Integrity?

<– Score

71. How do you determine the key elements that affect open source static code analysis tool workforce satisfaction, how are these elements determined for different workforce groups and segments?

<– Score

72. What is your formula for success in open source static code analysis tool ?

<– Score

73. How do you set open source static code analysis tool stretch targets and how do you get people to not only participate in setting these stretch targets but also that they strive to achieve these?

<– Score

74. Is it economical; do you have the time and money?

<– Score

75. How is implementation research currently incorporated into each of your goals?

<– Score

76. What is your question? Why?

<– Score

77. How do senior leaders deploy your organizations vision and values through your leadership system, to the workforce, to key suppliers and partners, and to customers and other stakeholders, as appropriate?

<– Score

78. What are the short and long-term open source static code analysis tool goals?

<– Score

79. What is your BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement)?

<– Score

80. What are the essentials of internal open source static code analysis tool management?

<– Score

81. How are you doing compared to your industry?

<– Score

82. Are new benefits received and understood?

<– Score

83. What counts that you are not counting?

<– Score

84. What may be the consequences for the performance of an organization if all stakeholders are not consulted regarding open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

85. Do you think you know, or do you know you know ?

<– Score

86. Who have you, as a company, historically been when you’ve been at your best?

<– Score

87. Who uses your product in ways you never expected?

<– Score

88. How do you accomplish your long range open source static code analysis tool goals?

<– Score

89. Who will determine interim and final deadlines?

<– Score

90. What are the success criteria that will indicate that open source static code analysis tool objectives have been met and the benefits delivered?

<– Score

91. Who are four people whose careers you have enhanced?

<– Score

92. Do you know who is a friend or a foe?

<– Score

93. What new services of functionality will be implemented next with open source static code analysis tool ?

<– Score

94. If no one would ever find out about your accomplishments, how would you lead differently?

<– Score

95. How can you negotiate open source static code analysis tool successfully with a stubborn boss, an irate client, or a deceitful coworker?

<– Score

96. If you find that you havent accomplished one of the goals for one of the steps of the open source static code analysis tool strategy, what will you do to fix it?

<– Score

97. Are you / should you be revolutionary or evolutionary?

<– Score

98. How do you govern and fulfill your societal responsibilities?

<– Score

99. Can the schedule be done in the given time?

<– Score

100. Has implementation been effective in reaching specified objectives so far?

<– Score

101. Why do and why don’t your customers like your organization?

<– Score

102. Who is responsible for open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

103. What is it like to work for you?

<– Score

104. What you are going to do to affect the numbers?

<– Score

105. How do you keep records, of what?

<– Score

106. What is effective open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

107. Where can you break convention?

<– Score

108. What would have to be true for the option on the table to be the best possible choice?

<– Score

109. What does your signature ensure?

<– Score

110. Do open source static code analysis tool rules make a reasonable demand on a users capabilities?

<– Score

111. What is the recommended frequency of auditing?

<– Score

112. Do you feel that more should be done in the open source static code analysis tool area?

<– Score

113. What potential megatrends could make your business model obsolete?

<– Score

114. How do customers see your organization?

<– Score

115. Are you paying enough attention to the partners your company depends on to succeed?

<– Score

116. Do you have an implicit bias for capital investments over people investments?

<– Score

117. Which models, tools and techniques are necessary?

<– Score

118. What are the rules and assumptions your industry operates under? What if the opposite were true?

<– Score

119. Have new benefits been realized?

<– Score

120. What management system can you use to leverage the open source static code analysis tool experience, ideas, and concerns of the people closest to the work to be done?

<– Score

121. How will you ensure you get what you expected?

<– Score

122. How do you assess the open source static code analysis tool pitfalls that are inherent in implementing it?

<– Score

123. How do you listen to customers to obtain actionable information?

<– Score

124. What is the overall business strategy?

<– Score

125. Which individuals, teams or departments will be involved in open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

126. Are you using a design thinking approach and integrating Innovation, open source static code analysis tool Experience, and Brand Value?

<– Score

127. How do you deal with open source static code analysis tool changes?

<– Score

128. What is the craziest thing you can do?

<– Score

129. Do you see more potential in people than they do in themselves?

<– Score

130. What are the challenges?

<– Score

131. How do you know if you are successful?

<– Score

132. Ask yourself: how would you do this work if you only had one staff member to do it?

<– Score

133. How much does open source static code analysis tool help?

<– Score

134. What are you trying to prove to yourself, and how might it be hijacking your life and business success?

<– Score

135. Marketing budgets are tighter, consumers are more skeptical, and social media has changed forever the way we talk about open source static code analysis tool, how do you gain traction?

<– Score

136. Who added code line X, when and why?

<– Score

137. If you had to leave your organization for a year and the only communication you could have with employees/colleagues was a single paragraph, what would you write?

<– Score

138. Who are the key stakeholders?

<– Score

139. Who is responsible for errors?

<– Score

140. What open source static code analysis tool skills are most important?

<– Score

141. Do you have the right capabilities and capacities?

<– Score

142. How can you become the company that would put you out of business?

<– Score

143. What role does communication play in the success or failure of a open source static code analysis tool project?

<– Score

144. Who is responsible for ensuring appropriate resources (time, people and money) are allocated to open source static code analysis tool?

<– Score

145. What are the long-term open source static code analysis tool goals?

<– Score

146. How do you engage the workforce, in addition to satisfying them?

<– Score

147. What are your personal philosophies regarding open source static code analysis tool and how do they influence your work?

<– Score

148. Can you do all this work?

<– Score

149. Will it be accepted by users?

<– Score

150. What are the potential basics of open source static code analysis tool fraud?

<– Score

151. Is your strategy driving your strategy? Or is the way in which you allocate resources driving your strategy?

<– Score

152. What have been your experiences in defining long range open source static code analysis tool goals?

<– Score

153. Who, on the executive team or the board, has spoken to a customer recently?

<– Score

154. What should you stop doing?

<– Score

155. How do you provide a safe environment -physically and emotionally?

<– Score

156. How do you lead with open source static code analysis tool in mind?

<– Score

157. Which open source static code analysis tool goals are the most important?

<– Score

158. What are the business goals open source static code analysis tool is aiming to achieve?

<– Score

159. What business benefits will open source static code analysis tool goals deliver if achieved?

<– Score

160. If your company went out of business tomorrow, would anyone who doesn’t get a paycheck here care?

<– Score

161. Who is the main stakeholder, with ultimate responsibility for driving open source static code analysis tool forward?

<– Score

162. What is a feasible sequencing of reform initiatives over time?

<– Score

163. What happens when a new employee joins the organization?

<– Score

164. How likely is it that a customer would recommend your company to a friend or colleague?

<– Score

165. If there were zero limitations, what would you do differently?

<– Score

166. Are the criteria for selecting recommendations stated?

<– Score

167. To whom do you add value?

<– Score

168. How long will it take to change?

<– Score

169. In retrospect, of the projects that you pulled the plug on, what percent do you wish had been allowed to keep going, and what percent do you wish had ended earlier?

<– Score

170. Are your responses positive or negative?

<– Score

171. How do you stay inspired?

<– Score

172. Who do we want your customers to become?

<– Score

173. How do you foster the skills, knowledge, talents, attributes, and characteristics you want to have?

<– Score

174. What are the key enablers to make this open source static code analysis tool move?

<– Score

175. How important is open source static code analysis tool to the user organizations mission?

<– Score

176. If you do not follow, then how to lead?

<– Score

177. What do we do when new problems arise?

<– Score

178. What is the kind of project structure that would be appropriate for your open source static code analysis tool project, should it be formal and complex, or can it be less formal and relatively simple?

<– Score

179. How do you keep the momentum going?

<– Score

180. What would you recommend your friend do if he/she were facing this dilemma?

<– Score

181. What information is critical to your organization that your executives are ignoring?

<– Score

182. What is your competitive advantage?

<– Score

183. What are the gaps in your knowledge and experience?

<– Score

184. Are you satisfied with your current role? If not, what is missing from it?

<– Score

185. Do you have past open source static code analysis tool successes?

<– Score

186. What is an unauthorized commitment?

<– Score

187. Would you rather sell to knowledgeable and informed customers or to uninformed customers?

<– Score

188. What are the usability implications of open source static code analysis tool actions?

<– Score

189. Which functions and people interact with the supplier and or customer?

<– Score

190. What is the purpose of open source static code analysis tool in relation to the mission?

<– Score

191. What was the last experiment you ran?

<– Score

192. What threat is open source static code analysis tool addressing?

<– Score

193. What is the range of capabilities?

<– Score

194. What are you challenging?

<– Score

195. Why should people listen to you?

<– Score

196. Are assumptions made in open source static code analysis tool stated explicitly?

<– Score

197. Is a open source static code analysis tool team work effort in place?

<– Score

198. If you weren’t already in this business, would you enter it today? And if not, what are you going to do about it?

<– Score

199. If you got fired and a new hire took your place, what would she do different?

<– Score

200. What happens if you do not have enough funding?

<– Score

201. What are the top 3 things at the forefront of your open source static code analysis tool agendas for the next 3 years?

<– Score

202. Is the impact that open source static code analysis tool has shown?

<– Score

203. What are internal and external open source static code analysis tool relations?

<– Score

204. Is the open source static code analysis tool organization completing tasks effectively and efficiently?

<– Score

205. Is there a work around that you can use?

<– Score

206. Is your basic point _____ or _____?

<– Score

207. Why is it important to have senior management support for a open source static code analysis tool project?

<– Score

208. What are strategies for increasing support and reducing opposition?

<– Score

209. Do you say no to customers for no reason?

<– Score

210. How do you create buy-in?

<– Score

211. How will you motivate the stakeholders with the least vested interest?

<– Score

212. Are you changing as fast as the world around you?

<– Score

213. Is open source static code analysis tool dependent on the successful delivery of a current project?

<– Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the open source static code analysis tool Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool and Managing Projects, Criteria for Project Managers:

1.0 Initiating Process Group: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1. How do you help others satisfy needs?

2. What are the required resources?

3. Professionals want to know what is expected from them what are the deliverables?

4. Just how important is your work to the overall success of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

5. What communication items need improvement?

6. How will it affect me?

7. Were decisions made in a timely manner?

8. What areas does the group agree are the biggest success on the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

9. Information sharing?

10. Who supports, improves, and oversees standardized processes related to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects program?

11. What is the stake of others in your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

12. The process to Manage Stakeholders is part of which process group?

13. How is each deliverable reviewed, verified, and validated?

14. Do you know the roles & responsibilities required for this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

15. Were sponsors and decision makers available when needed outside regularly scheduled meetings?

16. Who is involved in each phase?

17. Were resources available as planned?

18. Which of six sigmas dmaic phases focuses on the measurement of internal process that affect factors that are critical to quality?

19. Realistic - are the desired results expressed in a way that the team will be motivated and believe that the required level of involvement will be obtained?

20. What must be done?

1.1 Project Charter: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

21. Major high-level milestone targets: what events measure progress?

22. Why is it important?

23. Why do you need to manage scope?

24. Who is the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Manager?

25. If finished, on what date did it finish?

26. Market – identify products market, including whether it is outside of the objective: what is the purpose of the program or Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

27. Run it as as a startup?

28. Why do you manage integration?

29. Where and how does the team fit within your organization structure?

30. Who ise input and support will this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project require?

31. What is the justification?

32. What are the assigned resources?

33. What is in it for you?

34. Why executive support?

35. How much?

36. Fit with other Products Compliments – Cannibalizes?

37. Who are the stakeholders?

38. Success determination factors: how will the success of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project be determined from the customers perspective?

39. Why the improvements?

40. Review the general mission What system will be affected by the improvement efforts?

1.2 Stakeholder Register: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

41. What are the major Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project milestones requiring communications or providing communications opportunities?

42. What & Why?

43. How big is the gap?

44. What opportunities exist to provide communications?

45. How should employers make voices heard?

46. Is your organization ready for change?

47. Who is managing stakeholder engagement?

48. What is the power of the stakeholder?

49. Who wants to talk about Security?

50. How will reports be created?

51. How much influence do they have on the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

52. Information and research?

53. Accreditations, qualifications, certifications?

54. New markets, vertical, horizontal?

55. Does the stakeholder want to be involved or merely need to be informed about the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project and its process?

56. Accreditations, etc?

57. Is there a reason why you are or are not not using an external rating system?

58. Timescales, deadlines and pressures?

59. What resources might the stakeholder bring to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

60. Location and geographical?

61. What are the reimbursement requirements?

62. Sustainable financial backing?

63. What do people from other organizations see as your strengths?

64. Legislative effects?

65. What can the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects outcome be used for?

66. Price, value, quality?

67. How to measure the achievement of the Immediate Objective?

68. What obstacles does your organization face?

69. Identify the stakeholders levels most frequently used –or at least sought– in your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects and for which purpose?

70. Who holds positions of responsibility in interested organizations?

71. Market demand?

2.0 Planning Process Group: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

72. What business situation is being addressed?

73. What is the difference between the early schedule and late schedule?

74. How will users learn how to use the deliverables?

75. Are work methodologies, financial instruments, etc. shared among departments, organizations and Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects?

76. If action is called for, what form should it take?

77. You did your readings, yes?

78. In what way has the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project come up with innovative measures for problem-solving?

79. Will you be replaced?

80. How should needs be met?

81. Did you read it correctly?

82. Did the program design/ implementation strategy adequately address the planning stage necessary to set up structures, hire staff etc.?

83. How will it affect you?

84. In what way has the program contributed towards the issue culture and development included on the public agenda?

85. What will you do to minimize the impact should a risk event occur?

86. How will you know you did it?

87. To what extent is the program helping to influence your organizations policy framework?

88. When developing the estimates for Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project phases, you choose to add the individual estimates for the activities that comprise each phase. What type of estimation method are you using?

89. How can you make your needs known?

90. To what extent are the visions and actions of the partners consistent or divergent with regard to the program?

91. How will you do it?

2.1 Project Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

92. When is a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management plan created?

93. Do there need to be organizational changes?

94. Is the engineering content at a feasibility level-of-detail, and is it sufficiently complete, to provide an adequate basis for the baseline cost estimate?

95. Is the budget realistic?

96. What would you do differently what did not work?

97. Are the proposed Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project purposes different than a previously authorized Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

98. Is there anything you would now do differently on your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project based on past experience?

99. Does the selected plan protect privacy?

100. What should you drop in order to add something new?

101. Where does all this information come from?

102. Are the existing and future without-plan conditions reasonable and appropriate?

103. What data/reports/tools/etc. do program managers need?

104. How well are you able to manage your risk?

105. Development trends and opportunities. What if the positive direction and vision of your organization causes expected trends to change?

106. What data/reports/tools/etc. do your PMs need?

107. What are the assumptions?

108. What worked well?

109. Who is the sponsor?

2.2 Scope Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

110. Where do scope management processes fit in?

111. Has a capability assessment been conducted?

112. Has a provision been made to reassess Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project risks at various Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project stages?

113. Has a sponsor been identified?

114. Are Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team members involved in detailed estimating and scheduling?

115. How are you planning to maintain the scope baseline and how will you manage scope changes?

116. What if you do not have more detailed information on the report?

117. Is your organization structure for both tracking & controlling the budget well defined and assigned to a specific individual?

118. Timeline and milestones?

119. What problem is being solved by delivering this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

120. Who is responsible for monitoring the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project scope to ensure the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project remains within the scope baseline?

121. Function of the configuration control board?

122. Does a documented Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project organizational policy & plan (i.e. governance model) exist?

123. Can each item be appropriately scheduled?

124. What strengths do you have?

125. How much money have you spent?

126. Are multiple estimation methods being employed?

127. Are there any scope changes proposed for the previously authorized Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

128. Are risk triggers captured?

129. How do you know when you are finished?

2.3 Requirements Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

130. Is there formal agreement on who has authority to approve a change in requirements?

131. Are actual resource expenditures versus planned still acceptable?

132. Who will perform the analysis?

133. Why manage requirements?

134. Is stakeholder risk tolerance an important factor for the requirements process in this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

135. Do you have an appropriate arrangement for meetings?

136. Will the contractors involved take full responsibility?

137. Could inaccurate or incomplete requirements in this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project create a serious risk for the business?

138. Is there formal agreement on who has authority to request a change in requirements?

139. What is the earliest finish date for this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project if it is scheduled to start on …?

140. Will the product release be stable and mature enough to be deployed in the user community?

141. What information regarding the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project requirements will be reported?

142. How knowledgeable is the primary Stakeholder(s) in the proposed application area?

143. Is any organizational data being used or stored?

144. How detailed should the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project get?

145. Will you use tracing to help understand the impact of a change in requirements?

146. Business analysis scope?

147. After the requirements are gathered and set forth on the requirements register, theyre little more than a laundry list of items. Some may be duplicates, some might conflict with others and some will be too broad or too vague to understand. Describe how the requirements will be analyzed. Who will perform the analysis?

148. Will you perform a Requirements Risk assessment and develop a plan to deal with risks?

149. Controlling Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project requirements involves monitoring the status of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project requirements and managing changes to the requirements. Who is responsible for monitoring and tracking the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project requirements?

2.4 Requirements Documentation: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

150. Have the benefits identified with the system being identified clearly?

151. What is the risk associated with the technology?

152. Where do system and software requirements come from, what are sources?

153. Verifiability. can the requirements be checked?

154. How will the proposed Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project help?

155. What is your Elevator Speech?

156. Who provides requirements?

157. Who is involved?

158. Consistency. are there any requirements conflicts?

159. How will requirements be documented and who signs off on them?

160. Is new technology needed?

161. What will be the integration problems?

162. Where do you define what is a customer, what are the attributes of customer?

163. Do technical resources exist?

164. How can you document system requirements?

165. What facilities must be supported by the system?

166. What is the risk associated with cost and schedule?

167. How do you get the user to tell you what they want?

168. What are the acceptance criteria?

169. What are the potential disadvantages/advantages?

2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

170. Do you have a clear understanding of all subcontracts in place?

171. Is there a requirements traceability process in place?

172. How will it affect the stakeholders personally in career?

173. What are the chronologies, contingencies, consequences, criteria?

174. How small is small enough?

175. Will you use a Requirements Traceability Matrix?

176. What percentage of Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects are producing traceability matrices between requirements and other work products?

177. How do you manage scope?

178. Why use a WBS?

179. Why do you manage scope?

180. What is the WBS?

181. Describe the process for approving requirements so they can be added to the traceability matrix and Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project work can be performed. Will the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project requirements become approved in writing?

2.6 Project Scope Statement: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

182. What is the most common tool for helping define the detail?

183. What process would you recommend for creating the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project scope statement?

184. Will the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project risks be managed according to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects risk management process?

185. Elements of scope management that deal with concept development ?

186. What are the defined meeting materials?

187. Are the meetings set up to have assigned note takers that will add action/issues to the issue list?

188. If the scope changes, what will the impact be to your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project in terms of duration, cost, quality, or any other important areas of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

189. Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project lead, team lead, solution architect?

190. Has a method and process for requirement tracking been developed?

191. Are there completion/verification criteria defined for each task producing an output?

192. Change management vs. change leadership - what is the difference?

193. Is this process communicated to the customer and team members?

194. If there are vendors, have they signed off on the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Plan?

195. Is there an information system for the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

196. If you were to write a list of what should not be included in the scope statement, what are the things that you would recommend be described as out-of-scope?

197. Has the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project scope statement been reviewed as part of the baseline process?

198. Do you anticipate new stakeholders joining the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project over time?

199. Is the plan under configuration management?

2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

200. Are there processes in place to ensure that all the terms and code concepts have been documented consistently?

201. After observing execution of process, is it in compliance with the documented Plan?

202. Would known impacts serve as impediments?

203. Is the process working, and people are not executing in compliance of the process?

204. Is the current scope of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project substantially different than that originally defined in the approved Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project plan?

205. Have all involved stakeholders and work groups committed to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

206. When can log be discarded?

207. Should factors be unpredictable over time?

208. How many Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project staff does this specific process affect?

209. Are there processes defining how software will be developed including development methods, overall timeline for development, software product standards, and traceability?

210. What would you gain if you spent time working to improve this process?

211. What is positive about the current process?

212. Does the document/deliverable meet general requirements (for example, statement of work) for all deliverables?

213. No superfluous information or marketing narrative?

214. What to do at recovery?

215. Are there standards for code development?

216. Is there documentation of system capability requirements, data requirements, environment requirements, security requirements, and computer and hardware requirements?

217. Do you know what your customers expectations are regarding this process?

218. If appropriate, is the deliverable content consistent with current Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project documents and in compliance with the Document Management Plan?

2.8 Work Breakdown Structure: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

219. How much detail?

220. Is it still viable?

221. Why is it useful?

222. How will you and your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team define the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects scope and work breakdown structure?

223. What is the probability that the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project duration will exceed xx weeks?

224. What is the probability of completing the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project in less that xx days?

225. When does it have to be done?

226. Who has to do it?

227. Where does it take place?

228. Why would you develop a Work Breakdown Structure?

229. How big is a work-package?

230. How many levels?

231. Do you need another level?

232. How far down?

233. Can you make it?

234. What has to be done?

235. Is the work breakdown structure (wbs) defined and is the scope of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project clear with assigned deliverable owners?

2.9 WBS Dictionary: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

236. Does the sum of all work package budgets plus planning packages within control accounts equal the budgets assigned to the already stated control accounts?

237. Is future work which cannot be planned in detail subdivided to the extent practicable for budgeting and scheduling purposes?

238. Budgets assigned to major functional organizations?

239. Are procedures established to prevent changes to the contract budget base other than the already stated authorized by contractual action?

240. Are data elements summarized through the functional organizational structure for progressively higher levels of management?

241. Are all affected work authorizations, budgeting, and scheduling documents amended to properly reflect the effects of authorized changes?

242. Are the variances between budgeted and actual indirect costs identified and analyzed at the level of assigned responsibility for control (indirect pool, department, etc.)?

243. Are there procedures for monitoring action items and corrective actions to the point of resolution and are corresponding procedures being followed?

244. Is the work done on a work package level as described in the WBS dictionary?

245. Are records maintained to show how management reserves are used?

246. Changes in the nature of the overhead requirements?

247. Do work packages reflect the actual way in which the work will be done and are they meaningful products or management-oriented subdivisions of a higher level element of work?

248. Are management actions taken to reduce indirect costs when there are significant adverse variances?

249. All cwbs elements specified for external reporting?

250. Is work properly classified as measured effort, LOE, or apportioned effort and appropriately separated?

251. Are data elements reconcilable between internal summary reports and reports forwarded to us?

252. Are all authorized tasks assigned to identified organizational elements?

253. Are Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projected overhead costs in each pool and the associated direct costs used as the basis for establishing interim rates for allocating overhead to contracts?

254. What is the goal?

2.10 Schedule Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

255. Is it standard practice to formally commit stakeholders to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project via agreements?

256. Have all necessary approvals been obtained?

257. Have stakeholder accountabilities & responsibilities been clearly defined?

258. Are enough systems & user personnel assigned to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

259. Have Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management standards and procedures been identified / established and documented?

260. Is the critical path valid?

261. Are cause and effect determined for risks when they occur?

262. Staffing Requirements?

263. Has a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Communications Plan been developed?

264. What tools and techniques will be used to estimate activity durations?

265. Have the key functions and capabilities been defined and assigned to each release or iteration?

266. Are changes in deliverable commitments agreed to by all affected groups & individuals?

267. Are estimating assumptions and constraints captured?

268. Will the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project sponsor be involved in preliminary schedule reviews?

269. Is documentation created for communication with the suppliers and Vendors?

270. Will the tools selected accomplish the scheduling needs?

271. Is there any form of automated support for Issues Management?

272. Are milestone deliverables effectively tracked and compared to Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project plan?

273. Are risk oriented checklists used during risk identification?

2.11 Activity List: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

274. How difficult will it be to do specific activities on this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

275. How will it be performed?

276. Is there anything planned that does not need to be here?

277. Who will perform the work?

278. Where will it be performed?

279. What are you counting on?

280. What went well?

281. When do the individual activities need to start and finish?

282. How much slack is available in the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

283. Are the required resources available or need to be acquired?

284. How should ongoing costs be monitored to try to keep the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project within budget?

285. What went wrong?

286. How detailed should a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project get?

287. What will be performed?

288. When will the work be performed?

289. What is the LF and LS for each activity?

290. Should you include sub-activities?

291. What went right?

292. What is the total time required to complete the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project if no delays occur?

293. Is infrastructure setup part of your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

2.12 Activity Attributes: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

294. Does your organization of the data change its meaning?

295. Has management defined a definite timeframe for the turnaround or Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project window?

296. Activity: what is Missing?

297. Time for overtime?

298. Would you consider either of corresponding activities an outlier?

299. What is missing?

300. What conclusions/generalizations can you draw from this?

301. Can you re-assign any activities to another resource to resolve an over-allocation?

302. What is the general pattern here?

303. Resource is assigned to?

304. Is there a trend during the year?

305. Where else does it apply?

306. How many resources do you need to complete the work scope within a limit of X number of days?

307. Which method produces the more accurate cost assignment?

308. How do you manage time?

309. How many days do you need to complete the work scope with a limit of X number of resources?

310. How else could the items be grouped?

2.13 Milestone List: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

311. How will the milestone be verified?

312. Sustaining internal capabilities?

313. What specific improvements did you make to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project proposal since the previous time?

314. Level of the Innovation?

315. How soon can the activity finish?

316. Marketing - reach, distribution, awareness?

317. How late can the activity finish?

318. Effects on core activities, distraction?

319. Environmental effects?

320. Competitive advantages?

321. Describe your organizations strengths and core competencies. What factors will make your organization succeed?

322. Do you foresee any technical risks or developmental challenges?

323. Political effects?

324. Identify critical paths (one or more) and which activities are on the critical path?

325. How difficult will it be to do specific activities on this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

326. How late can each activity be finished and started?

327. How late can the activity start?

2.14 Network Diagram: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

328. What activity must be completed immediately before this activity can start?

329. What is the completion time?

330. If the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project network diagram cannot change and you have extra personnel resources, what is the BEST thing to do?

331. What to do and When?

332. Where do you schedule uncertainty time?

333. If a current contract exists, can you provide the vendor name, contract start, and contract expiration date?

334. Are the required resources available?

335. What are the Key Success Factors?

336. How confident can you be in your milestone dates and the delivery date?

337. What activities must follow this activity?

338. What is the lowest cost to complete this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project in xx weeks?

339. Will crashing x weeks return more in benefits than it costs?

340. What controls the start and finish of a job?

341. Can you calculate the confidence level?

342. What job or jobs precede it?

343. What can be done concurrently?

344. Are the gantt chart and/or network diagram updated periodically and used to assess the overall Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project timetable?

345. What activities must occur simultaneously with this activity?

346. Planning: who, how long, what to do?

347. What must be completed before an activity can be started?

2.15 Activity Resource Requirements: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

348. Why do you do that?

349. Organizational Applicability?

350. Do you use tools like decomposition and rolling-wave planning to produce the activity list and other outputs?

351. Which logical relationship does the PDM use most often?

352. Are there unresolved issues that need to be addressed?

353. How many signatures do you require on a check and does this match what is in your policy and procedures?

354. How do you handle petty cash?

355. When does monitoring begin?

356. What are constraints that you might find during the Human Resource Planning process?

357. Other support in specific areas?

358. Anything else?

359. What is the Work Plan Standard?

2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

360. The list could probably go on, but, the thing that you would most like to know is, How long & How much?

361. How difficult will it be to do specific activities on this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

362. Any changes from stakeholders?

363. How can this help you with team building?

364. Why time management?

365. What defines a successful Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

366. What is the primary purpose of the human resource plan?

367. What is your organizations history in doing similar activities?

368. Who will be used as a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team member?

369. Who is allowed to perform which functions?

370. Why do you do it?

371. Which resources should be in the resource pool?

372. What is the purpose of assigning and documenting responsibility?

373. Who needs what information?

374. What is the number one predictor of a groups productivity?

375. What is the difference between % Complete and % work?

2.17 Activity Duration Estimates: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

376. Why is there a growing trend in outsourcing, especially in the government?

377. If you plan to take the PMP exam soon, what should you do to prepare?

378. Are contractor costs, schedule and technical performance monitored throughout the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

379. Are inspections completed to determine if the results comply with the requirements?

380. What distinguishes one organization from another in this area?

381. How do theories relate to Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management?

382. After how many days will the lease cost be the same as the purchase cost for the equipment?

383. Does the software appear easy to learn?

384. Do Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team members work in the same physical location to enhance team performance?

385. What type of information goes in a quality assurance plan?

386. What are the three main outputs of quality control?

387. What is the critical path for this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project and how long is it?

388. Are procedures defined for calculating cost estimates?

389. Why do you need a good WBS to use Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management software?

390. Under corresponding circumstances what would be the best thing to do?

391. What are the main types of contracts if you do decide to outsource?

392. Is a formal written notice that the contract is complete provided to the seller?

393. Do procedures exist that identify when and how human resources are introduced and removed from the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

394. What are the ways to create and distribute Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project performance information?

395. What are the largest companies that provide information technology outsourcing services?

2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

396. Done before proceeding with this activity or what can be done concurrently?

397. What are the critical bottleneck activities?

398. Why estimate costs?

399. Science = process: remember the scientific method?

400. What questions do you have?

401. When, then?

402. What utility impacts are there?

403. What is cost and Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project cost management?

404. How should ongoing costs be monitored to try to keep the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project within budget?

405. Why estimate time and cost?

406. Define the work as completely as possible. What work will be included in the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

407. What is the total time required to complete the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project if no delays occur?

408. What is an Average Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

409. Small or large Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

410. Is this operation cost effective?

411. For other activities, how much delay can be tolerated?

412. Do any colleagues have experience with your organization and/or RFPs?

413. Can the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project be constructed as planned?

2.19 Project Schedule: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

414. Activity charts and bar charts are graphical representations of a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project schedule …how do they differ?

415. Your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management plan results in a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project schedule that is too long. If the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project network diagram cannot change and you have extra personnel resources, what is the BEST thing to do?

416. Did the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project come in on schedule?

417. How can you address that situation?

418. Are there activities that came from a template or previous Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project that are not applicable on this phase of this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

419. What is risk?

420. What is the difference?

421. Why is software Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project disaster so common?

422. Why do you think schedule issues often cause the most conflicts on Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects?

423. Is infrastructure setup part of your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

424. Are key risk mitigation strategies added to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project schedule?

425. Why or why not?

426. Are all remaining durations correct?

427. Does the condition or event threaten the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects objectives in any ways?

428. Eliminate unnecessary activities. Are there activities that came from a template or previous Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project that are not applicable on this phase of this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

429. Are procedures defined by which the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project schedule may be changed?

430. Master Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project schedule?

2.20 Cost Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

431. Will the forecasts be based on trend analysis and earned value statistics?

432. Designated small business reserve?

433. Has a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Communications Plan been developed?

434. Cost / benefit analysis?

435. Has your organization readiness assessment been conducted?

436. Has a provision been made to reassess Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project risks at various Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project stages?

437. What would the life cycle costs be?

438. What is Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management?

439. Planning and scheduling responsibilities – How will the responsibilities for planning and scheduling be allocated?

440. Is the quality assurance team identified?

441. Are the appropriate IT resources adequate to meet planned commitments?

442. Are actuals compared against estimates to analyze and correct variances?

443. Are tasks tracked by hours?

444. What is your organizations history in doing similar tasks?

445. Cost estimate preparation – What cost estimates will be prepared during the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project phases?

446. Are Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team members involved in detailed estimating and scheduling?

447. Are assumptions being identified, recorded, analyzed, qualified and closed?

448. Estimating responsibilities – how will the responsibilities for cost estimating be allocated?

2.21 Activity Cost Estimates: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

449. Does the estimator estimate by task or by person?

450. Does the activity serve a common type of customer?

451. What is a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Management Plan?

452. Was the consultant knowledgeable about the program?

453. How do you fund change orders?

454. What is Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project cost management?

455. What areas does the group agree are the biggest success on the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

456. What do you want to know about the stay to know if costs were inappropriately high or low?

457. What cost data should be used to estimate costs during the 2-year follow-up period?

458. Specific - is the objective clear in terms of what, how, when, and where the situation will be changed?

459. Certification of actual expenditures?

460. What were things that you did well, and could improve, and how?

461. Review – what are some common errors in activities to avoid?

462. What happens if you cannot produce the documentation for the single audit?

463. What is the activity recast of the budget?

464. Performance bond should always provide what part of the contract value?

465. Who & what determines the need for contracted services?

466. Were you satisfied with the work?

467. How do you do activity recasts?

2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

468. What additional Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project(s) could be initiated as a result of this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

469. What can be included?

470. What is the estimated labor cost today based upon this information?

471. Does the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project provide innovative ways for stakeholders to overcome obstacles or deliver better outcomes?

472. What happens to any remaining funds not used?

473. Who is best positioned to know and assist in identifying corresponding factors?

474. Is it feasible to establish a control group arrangement?

475. What info is needed?

476. Can a trend be established from historical performance data on the selected measure and are the criteria for using trend analysis or forecasting methods met?

477. Will the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project collaborate with the local community and leverage resources?

478. Value pocket identification & quantification what are value pockets?

479. Ask: are others positioned to know, are others credible, and will others cooperate?

480. What costs are to be estimated?

481. Is the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project responsive to community need?

482. What is the purpose of estimating?

483. Identify the timeframe necessary to monitor progress and collect data to determine how the selected measure has changed?

484. What will others want?

485. How will the results be shared and to whom?

2.23 Cost Baseline: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

486. How likely is it to go wrong?

487. If you sold 10x widgets on a day, what would the affect on profits be?

488. Does a process exist for establishing a cost baseline to measure Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project performance?

489. Has the actual cost of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project (or Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project phase) been tallied and compared to the approved budget?

490. On budget?

491. Are procedures defined by which the cost baseline may be changed?

492. Has training and knowledge transfer of the operations organization been completed?

493. Are you meeting with your team regularly?

494. Have all approved changes to the cost baseline been identified and impact on the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project documented?

495. Who will use corresponding metrics ?

496. What can go wrong?

497. Escalation criteria met?

498. Have the lessons learned been filed with the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Management Office?

499. Will the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project fail if the change request is not executed?

500. Has the appropriate access to relevant data and analysis capability been granted?

501. How accurate do cost estimates need to be?

502. At which frequency ?

503. Does it impact schedule, cost, quality?

2.24 Quality Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

504. Is there a Steering Committee in place?

505. Contradictory information between document sections?

506. How is the information recorded?

507. What data do you gather/use/compile?

508. How are changes to procedures made?

509. What type of in-house testing do you conduct?

510. What are the established criteria that sampling / testing data are compared against?

511. How many Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project staff does this specific process affect?

512. How does your organization establish and maintain customer relationships?

513. Does a prospective decision remain the same regardless of what the data show is?

514. What would be the next steps or what else should you do at this point?

515. What other teams / processes would be impacted by changes to the current process, and how?

516. How do you manage quality?

517. Were the right locations/samples tested for the right parameters?

518. What are your organizations current levels and trends for the already stated measures related to financial and marketplace performance?

519. Written by multiple authors and in multiple writing styles?

520. When reporting to different audiences, do you vary the form or type of report?

521. How are changes recorded?

522. What is the Quality Management Plan?

2.25 Quality Metrics: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

523. Is there a set of procedures to capture, analyze and act on quality metrics?

524. Are quality metrics defined?

525. Should a modifier be included?

526. Where did complaints, returns and warranty claims come from?

527. How exactly do you define when differences exist?

528. What happens if you get an abnormal result?

529. Did evaluation start on time?

530. What forces exist that would cause them to change?

531. Are interface issues coordinated?

532. Who notifies stakeholders of normal and abnormal results?

533. If the defect rate during testing is substantially higher than that of the previous release (or a similar product), then ask: Did you plan for and actually improve testing effectiveness?

534. What documentation is required?

535. Do the operators focus on determining; is there anything you need to worry about?

536. Where is quality now?

537. How can the effectiveness of each of the activities be measured?

538. Has trace of defects been initiated?

539. When is the security analysis testing complete?

540. Product Availability ?

541. Is quality culture a competitive advantage?

2.26 Process Improvement Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

542. What is the return on investment?

543. Have the frequency of collection and the points in the process where measurements will be made been determined?

544. What actions are needed to address the problems and achieve the goals?

545. Have storage and access mechanisms and procedures been determined?

546. What personnel are the coaches for your initiative?

547. The motive is determined by asking, Why do you want to achieve this goal?

548. Everyone agrees on what process improvement is, right?

549. Are you making progress on the goals?

550. What is quality and how will you ensure it?

551. Why do you want to achieve the goal?

552. How do you measure?

553. Where do you want to be?

554. What personnel are the change agents for your initiative?

555. Are you making progress on your improvement plan?

556. Who should prepare the process improvement action plan?

557. What lessons have you learned so far?

558. Where are you now?

559. Why quality management?

2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

560. Most people let you know when others re too busy, and are others really too busy?

561. What expertise is not available in your department?

562. The staff interests – is the group or the person interested in working for this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

563. Does the contractors system include procedures for measuring the performance of critical subcontractors?

564. How many hours by each staff member/rate?

565. What materials and procurements needed?

566. Time-phased control account budgets?

567. Are meaningful indicators identified for use in measuring the status of cost and schedule performance?

568. The already stated responsible for overhead performance control of related costs?

569. Are the requirements for all items of overhead established by rational, traceable processes?

570. Cwbs elements to be subcontracted, with identification of subcontractors?

571. The anticipated business volume?

572. Does the scheduling system identify in a timely manner the status of work?

573. Does the contractors system identify work accomplishment against the schedule plan?

574. Who is going to do that work?

575. What do people write/say on status/Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project reports?

576. Are the wbs and organizational levels for application of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projected overhead costs identified?

577. Are overhead cost budgets established for each organization which has authority to incur overhead costs?

2.28 Roles and Responsibilities: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

578. What areas of supervision are challenging for you?

579. Once the responsibilities are defined for the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project, have the deliverables, roles and responsibilities been clearly communicated to every participant?

580. Authority: what areas/Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects in your work do you have the authority to decide upon and act on the already stated decisions?

581. Where are you most strong as a supervisor?

582. Are your policies supportive of a culture of quality data?

583. Concern: where are you limited or have no authority, where you can not influence?

584. Is feedback clearly communicated and non-judgmental?

585. Accountabilities: what are the roles and responsibilities of individual team members?

586. What are your major roles and responsibilities in the area of performance measurement and assessment?

587. What expectations were NOT met?

588. Influence: what areas of organizational decision making are you able to influence when you do not have authority to make the final decision?

589. What expectations were met?

590. Was the expectation clearly communicated?

591. Who is responsible for each task?

592. Are governance roles and responsibilities documented?

593. Once the responsibilities are defined for the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project, have the deliverables, roles and responsibilities been clearly communicated to every participant?

594. To decide whether to use a quality measurement, ask how will you know when it is achieved?

595. Key conclusions and recommendations: Are conclusions and recommendations relevant and acceptable?

596. What areas would you highlight for changes or improvements?

597. What is working well within your organizations performance management system?

2.29 Human Resource Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

598. Are cause and effect determined for risks when others occur?

599. Is current scope of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project substantially different than that originally defined?

600. Does all Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project documentation reside in a common repository for easy access?

601. Are procurement deliverables arriving on time and to specification?

602. What commitments have been made?

603. Has the business need been clearly defined?

604. Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Objectives?

605. Has a quality assurance plan been developed for the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

606. Are Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project contact logs kept up to date?

607. Are staff skills known and available for each task?

608. Is there a requirements change management processes in place?

609. How will the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project manage expectations & meet needs and requirements?

610. Is the communication plan being followed?

611. How complete is the human resource management plan?

612. Who is evaluated?

613. Do you have the reasons why the changes to your organizational systems and capabilities are required?

614. Personnel with expertise?

2.30 Communications Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

615. What approaches to you feel are the best ones to use?

616. Who needs to know and how much?

617. Are others needed?

618. Which stakeholders can influence others?

619. What to know?

620. Are stakeholders internal or external?

621. In your work, how much time is spent on stakeholder identification?

622. How do you manage communications?

623. Do you ask; can you recommend others for you to talk with about this initiative?

624. Are there too many who have an interest in some aspect of your work?

625. Who is the stakeholder?

626. Conflict resolution -which method when?

627. Who have you worked with in past, similar initiatives?

628. What does the stakeholder need from the team?

629. Which stakeholders are thought leaders, influences, or early adopters?

630. Who will use or be affected by the result of a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

631. Are you constantly rushing from meeting to meeting?

632. Do you prepare stakeholder engagement plans?

2.31 Risk Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

633. Who/what can assist?

634. Risk documentation: what reporting formats and processes will be used for risk management activities?

635. Are testing tools available and suitable?

636. Why do you want risk management?

637. Degree of confidence in estimated size estimate?

638. Which risks should get the attention?

639. How much risk can you tolerate?

640. What are it-specific requirements?

641. Are formal technical reviews part of this process?

642. Litigation – what is the probability that lawsuits will cause problems or delays in the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

643. Monitoring -what factors can you track that will enable you to determine if the risk is becoming more or less likely?

644. Prioritized components/features?

645. Was an original risk assessment/risk management plan completed?

646. Risks should be identified during which phase of Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management life cycle?

647. How well were you able to manage your risk before?

648. Is the process being followed?

649. If you can not fix it, how do you do it differently?

650. Does the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team have experience with the technology to be implemented?

651. How would you suggest monitoring for risk transition indicators?

652. How can you fix it?

2.32 Risk Register: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

653. What can be done about it?

654. What is your current and future risk profile?

655. What has changed since the last period?

656. What are the major risks facing the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

657. What should you do when?

658. What is the probability and impact of the risk occurring?

659. What evidence do you have to justify the likelihood score of the risk (audit, incident report, claim, complaints, inspection, internal review)?

660. How are risks identified?

661. Do you require further engagement?

662. Budget and schedule: what are the estimated costs and schedules for performing risk-related activities?

663. What are you going to do to limit the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects risk exposure due to the identified risks?

664. What will be done?

665. Manageability – have mitigations to the risk been identified?

666. What is the appropriate level of risk management for this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

667. Severity Prediction?

668. Have other controls and solutions been implemented in other services which could be applied as an alternative to additional funding?

669. Who needs to know about this?

670. What could prevent you delivering on the strategic program objectives and what is being done to mitigate corresponding issues?

671. People risk -are people with appropriate skills available to help complete the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

672. Mitigation -how can you avoid the risk?

673. How do you maximize short-term return on investment?

674. Risk categorization -which of your categories has more risk than others?

675. Are tools for analysis and design available?

676. Is there additional information that would make you more confident about your analysis?

677. Do you manage the process through use of metrics?

678. Are there new risks that mitigation strategies might introduce?

679. How do risks change during a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project life cycle?

680. Are the risk data complete?

681. To what extent is the chosen technology maturing?

682. What are your data sources?

683. What are the current or emerging trends of culture?

684. How solid is the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projection of competitive reaction?

685. Why has this particular mode of contracting been chosen?

686. How are you working with risks?

687. What are the current demands of the customer?

688. How well is the risk understood?

689. Which of corresponding risk factors can be avoided altogether?

690. What is the likelihood of a breakthrough?

691. When and how will the recent breakthroughs in basic research lead to commercial products?

2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

692. The customer requests a change to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project that would increase the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project risk. Which should you do before ass the others?

693. Is the present organizational structure for handling the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project sufficient?

694. Have you worked with the customer in the past?

695. What action do you usually take against risks?

696. Can you handle the investment risk?

697. What can you use the analyzed risks for?

698. Who is going to be the consortium leader?

699. What risks were tracked?

700. Are Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project requirements stable?

701. Is security a central objective?

702. Has something like this been done before?

703. During which risk management process is a determination to transfer a risk made?

704. Is the customer technically sophisticated in the product area?

705. What are the likely future requirements?

706. How is the risk management process used in practice?

707. Are tool mentors available?

708. What things are likely to change?

709. Which is an input to the risk management process?

710. Will there be an increase in the political conservatism?

711. What are the risks involved in appointing external agencies to manage the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

2.35 Risk Data Sheet: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

712. What will be the consequences if it happens?

713. Whom do you serve (customers)?

714. What do people affected think about the need for, and practicality of preventive measures?

715. What do you know?

716. What can happen?

717. Has a sensitivity analysis been carried out?

718. What are you trying to achieve (Objectives)?

719. What were the Causes that contributed?

720. What can you do?

721. What was measured?

722. Do effective diagnostic tests exist?

723. How reliable is the data source?

724. Potential for recurrence?

725. What is the likelihood of it happening?

726. What is the chance that it will happen?

727. What will be the consequences if the risk happens?

728. Who has a vested interest in how you perform as your organization (our stakeholders)?

729. Has the most cost-effective solution been chosen?

2.36 Procurement Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

730. If standardized procurement documents are needed, where can others be found?

731. Does the detailed work plan match the complexity of tasks with the capabilities of personnel?

732. Is the steering committee active in Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project oversight?

733. Has a provision been made to reassess Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project risks at various Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project stages?

734. Does the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project have a formal Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Charter?

735. Have all team members been part of identifying risks?

736. Are the quality tools and methods identified in the Quality Plan appropriate to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

737. Is there an on-going process in place to monitor Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project risks?

738. How and when do you enter into Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Procurement Management?

739. Is a pmo (Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management office) in place which provides oversight to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

740. Are changes in scope (deliverable commitments) agreed to by all affected groups & individuals?

741. Is the current scope of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project substantially different than that originally defined?

742. Are stakeholders aware and supportive of the principles and practices of modern software estimation?

743. Similar Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects?

744. Is there a Quality Management Plan?

745. Are the results of quality assurance reviews provided to affected groups & individuals?

2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

746. In the technical/management area, what criteria do you use to determine the final evaluation ratings?

747. How will you evaluate offerors proposals?

748. What is the role of counsel in the procurement process?

749. How can the methods of publicizing the buy be tailored to yield more effective price competition?

750. What management structure does your organization consider as optimal for performing the contract?

751. How are clarifications and communications appropriately used?

752. How long will it take for the purchase cost to be the same as the lease cost?

753. Can you reasonably estimate total organization requirements for the coming year?

754. If the costs are normalized, please account for how the normalization is conducted. Is a cost realism analysis used?

755. Who must be notified?

756. How can business terms and conditions be improved to yield more effective price competition?

757. What documentation should be used to support the selection decision?

758. Do you want to wait until all offerors have been evaluated?

759. Can you prevent comparison of proposals?

760. How do you consolidate reviews and analysis of evaluators?

761. Do you want to have them collaborate at subfactor level?

762. Are evaluators ready to begin this task?

763. What benefits are accrued from issuing a DRFP in advance of issuing a final RFP?

764. When and what information can be considered with offerors regarding past performance?

765. Is there collaboration among your evaluators?

2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

766. Where are the verification requirements to be documented (eg purchase order, agreement etc)?

767. Has a structured approach been used to break work effort into manageable components (WBS)?

768. Why is it important to reduce deliverables to a smallest component?

769. Are non-critical path items updated and agreed upon with the teams?

770. Are communication systems currently in place appropriate?

771. What sources of information are reliable?

772. What is the general purpose in defining responsibilities of the already stated affiliated with the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

773. Is a pmo (Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management office) in place and does it provide oversight to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

774. Are internal Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project status meetings held at reasonable intervals?

775. Are meeting objectives identified for each meeting?

776. Have process improvement efforts been completed before requirements efforts begin?

777. Is a stakeholder management plan in place?

778. Is a payment system in place with proper reviews and approvals?

779. How will the equipment be verified?

780. Detail warranty and/or maintenance periods?

781. Are decisions captured in a decisions log?

782. Are all payments made according to the contract(s)?

783. Have reserves been created to address risks?

2.39 Change Management Plan: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

784. What are the training strategies?

785. What are the key change management success metrics?

786. What risks may occur upfront, during implementation and after implementation?

787. What are the specific target groups/audiences that will be impacted by this change?

788. How will the stakeholders share information and transfer knowledge?

789. What is the most cynical response it can receive?

790. Who might be able to help you the most?

791. What type of materials/channels will be available to leverage?

792. What will be the preferred method of delivery?

793. Have the approved procedures and policies been published?

794. Has the training provider been established?

795. Has a training need analysis been carried out?

796. Why is the initiative is being undertaken - What are the business drivers?

797. Identify the risk and assess the significance and likelihood of it occurring and plan the contingency What risks may occur upfront?

798. What did the people around you say about it?

799. How many people are required in each of the roles?

800. Are there any restrictions on who can receive the communications?

801. Who is the target audience of the piece of information?

802. When to start change management?

3.0 Executing Process Group: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

803. How can you use Microsoft Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project and Excel to assist in Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project risk management?

804. Why should Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project managers strive to make jobs look easy?

805. What areas were overlooked on this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

806. In what way has the program come up with innovative measures for problem-solving?

807. What are the critical steps involved with strategy mapping?

808. Do your results resemble a normal distribution?

809. How can software assist in procuring goods and services?

810. Does the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team have the right skills?

811. What are the critical steps involved in selecting measures and initiatives?

812. Why is it important to determine activity sequencing on Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects?

813. What were things that you did very well and want to do the same again on the next Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

814. What is in place for ensuring adequate change control on Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects that involve outside contracts?

815. Are the necessary foundations in place to ensure the sustainability of the results of the programme?

816. What are the main processes included in Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project quality management?

817. What factors are contributing to progress or delay in the achievement of products and results?

818. What areas does the group agree are the biggest success on the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

819. On which process should team members spend the most time?

820. What are the typical Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management skills?

821. How do you enter durations, link tasks, and view critical path information?

822. Have operating capacities been created and/or reinforced in partners?

3.1 Team Member Status Report: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

823. What is to be done?

824. Are the products of your organizations Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects meeting customers objectives?

825. Will the staff do training or is that done by a third party?

826. Does your organization have the means (staff, money, contract, etc.) to produce or to acquire the product, good, or service?

827. Why is it to be done?

828. How can you make it practical?

829. Are your organizations Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects more successful over time?

830. When a teams productivity and success depend on collaboration and the efficient flow of information, what generally fails them?

831. How will resource planning be done?

832. How does this product, good, or service meet the needs of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project and your organization as a whole?

833. The problem with Reward & Recognition Programs is that the truly deserving people all too often get left out. How can you make it practical?

834. Does every department have to have a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Manager on staff?

835. How much risk is involved?

836. Is there evidence that staff is taking a more professional approach toward management of your organizations Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects?

837. How it is to be done?

838. Are the attitudes of staff regarding Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project work improving?

839. Do you have an Enterprise Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Management Office (EPMO)?

840. Does the product, good, or service already exist within your organization?

841. What specific interest groups do you have in place?

3.2 Change Request: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

842. Describe how modifications, enhancements, defects and/or deficiencies shall be notified (e.g. Problem Reports, Change Requests etc) and managed. Detail warranty and/or maintenance periods?

843. What are the requirements for urgent changes?

844. Who can suggest changes?

845. Have scm procedures for noting the change, recording it, and reporting it been followed?

846. What has an inspector to inspect and to check?

847. What is a Change Request Form?

848. Should a more thorough impact analysis be conducted?

849. Have all related configuration items been properly updated?

850. When to submit a change request?

851. How are changes graded and who is responsible for the rating?

852. How does your organization control changes before and after software is released to a customer?

853. Will all change requests and current status be logged?

854. How is the change documented (format, content, storage)?

855. How many lines of code must be changed to implement the change?

856. Will new change requests be acknowledged in a timely manner?

857. What are the duties of the change control team?

858. Can static requirements change attributes like the size of the change be used to predict reliability in execution?

859. Who needs to approve change requests?

860. What can be filed?

3.3 Change Log: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

861. Does the suggested change request represent a desired enhancement to the products functionality?

862. Who initiated the change request?

863. Is the change backward compatible without limitations?

864. When was the request approved?

865. Is the change request within Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project scope?

866. Is the submitted change a new change or a modification of a previously approved change?

867. Is the requested change request a result of changes in other Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project(s)?

868. Is this a mandatory replacement?

869. When was the request submitted?

870. How does this change affect the timeline of the schedule?

871. Does the suggested change request seem to represent a necessary enhancement to the product?

872. Do the described changes impact on the integrity or security of the system?

873. How does this relate to the standards developed for specific business processes?

874. Will the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project fail if the change request is not executed?

875. Is the change request open, closed or pending?

876. Where do changes come from?

877. How does this change affect scope?

3.4 Decision Log: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

878. Decision-making process; how will the team make decisions?

879. It becomes critical to track and periodically revisit both operational effectiveness; Are you noticing all that you need to, and are you interpreting what you see effectively?

880. What eDiscovery problem or issue did your organization set out to fix or make better?

881. Linked to original objective?

882. What makes you different or better than others companies selling the same thing?

883. Is everything working as expected?

884. Who is the decisionmaker?

885. What are the cost implications?

886. Do strategies and tactics aimed at less than full control reduce the costs of management or simply shift the cost burden?

887. How consolidated and comprehensive a story can you tell by capturing currently available incident data in a central location and through a log of key decisions during an incident?

888. At what point in time does loss become unacceptable?

889. What is the average size of your matters in an applicable measurement?

890. Does anything need to be adjusted?

891. With whom was the decision shared or considered?

892. What was the rationale for the decision?

893. What alternatives/risks were considered?

894. Meeting purpose; why does this team meet?

895. Adversarial environment. is your opponent open to a non-traditional workflow, or will it likely challenge anything you do?

896. What is the line where eDiscovery ends and document review begins?

897. How effective is maintaining the log at facilitating organizational learning?

3.5 Quality Audit: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

898. For each device to be reconditioned, are device specifications, such as appropriate engineering drawings, component specifications and software specifications, maintained?

899. How does your organization know that it is effectively and constructively guiding staff through to timely completion of tasks?

900. How does your organization know that its system for recruiting the best staff possible are appropriately effective and constructive?

901. Are all employees including salespersons made aware that they must report all complaints received from any source for inclusion in the complaint handling system?

902. How does your organization know that its planning processes are appropriately effective and constructive?

903. How does your organization know that its relationships with industry and employers are appropriately effective and constructive?

904. What are the main things that hinder your ability to do a good job?

905. How does your organization know that its advisory services are appropriately effective and constructive?

906. How does your organization know that its policy management system is appropriately effective and constructive?

907. What does the organizarion look for in a Quality audit?

908. How does your organization know that the support for its staff is appropriately effective and constructive?

909. Are training programs documented?

910. How does your organization know that its financial management system is appropriately effective and constructive?

911. Statements of intent remain exactly that until they are put into effect. The next step is to deploy the already stated intentions. In other words, do the plans happen in reality?

912. What are you trying to accomplish with this audit?

913. Are the intentions consistent with external obligations ( such as applicable laws)?

914. Are all areas associated with the storage and reconditioning of devices clean, free of rubbish, adequately ventilated and in good repair?

915. How does your organization know that its management system is appropriately effective and constructive?

916. How do you know what, specifically, is required of you in your work?

3.6 Team Directory: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

917. How will you accomplish and manage the objectives?

918. Process decisions: which organizational elements and which individuals will be assigned management functions?

919. Process decisions: is work progressing on schedule and per contract requirements?

920. Who are your stakeholders (customers, sponsors, end users, team members)?

921. Timing: when do the effects of communication take place?

922. Process decisions: do job conditions warrant additional actions to collect job information and document on-site activity?

923. Who will write the meeting minutes and distribute?

924. Does a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team directory list all resources assigned to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

925. Have you decided when to celebrate the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects completion date?

926. Process decisions: are there any statutory or regulatory issues relevant to the timely execution of work?

927. Who will report Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project status to all stakeholders?

928. Who should receive information (all stakeholders)?

929. Who are the Team Members?

930. Process decisions: do invoice amounts match accepted work in place?

931. Where will the product be used and/or delivered or built when appropriate?

932. Decisions: is the most suitable form of contract being used?

933. How will the team handle changes?

934. Days from the time the issue is identified?

3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

935. Must your members collaborate successfully to complete Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects?

936. Communication protocols: how will the team communicate?

937. Do you listen for voice tone and word choice to understand the meaning behind words?

938. Have you established procedures that team members can follow to work effectively together, such as a team operating agreement?

939. Are leadership responsibilities shared among team members (versus a single leader)?

940. What are the current caseload numbers in the unit?

941. Do you call or email participants to ensure understanding, follow-through and commitment to the meeting outcomes?

942. How will your group handle planned absences?

943. Do team members need to frequently communicate as a full group to make timely decisions?

944. What is the anticipated procedure (recruitment, solicitation of volunteers, or assignment) for selecting team members?

945. What is teaming?

946. Are team roles clearly defined and accepted?

947. What types of accommodations will be formulated and put in place for sustaining the team?

948. How will group handle unplanned absences?

949. Do you determine the meeting length and time of day?

950. To whom do you deliver your services?

951. Are there influences outside the team that may affect performance, and if so, have you identified and addressed them?

952. Do team members reside in more than two countries?

953. Do you post any action items, due dates, and responsibilities on the team website?

954. Why does your organization want to participate in teaming?

3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

955. To what degree does the teams work approach provide opportunity for members to engage in results-based evaluation?

956. What are teams?

957. Do friends perform better than acquaintances?

958. Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact?

959. To what degree does the team possess adequate membership to achieve its ends?

960. To what degree is the team cognizant of small wins to be celebrated along the way?

961. Where to from here?

962. To what degree does the teams work approach provide opportunity for members to engage in fact-based problem solving?

963. Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts?

964. Do you give group members authority to make at least some important decisions?

965. To what degree are the teams goals and objectives clear, simple, and measurable?

966. How much interpersonal friction is there in your team?

967. To what degree does the teams purpose constitute a broader, deeper aspiration than just accomplishing short-term goals?

968. How does Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project termination impact Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team members?

969. Delaying market entry: how long is too long?

970. Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: what is important for team functioning?

971. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive?

972. If you have received criticism from reviewers that your work suffered from method variance, what was the circumstance?

973. To what degree do team members agree with the goals, relative importance, and the ways in which achievement will be measured?

974. To what degree are fresh input and perspectives systematically caught and added (for example, through information and analysis, new members, and senior sponsors)?

3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

975. To what degree do team members understand one anothers roles and skills?

976. What are the key duties or tasks of the Ratee?

977. What is a general description of the processes under performance measurement and assessment?

978. To what degree can team members meet frequently enough to accomplish the teams ends?

979. To what extent are systems and applications (e.g., game engine, mobile device platform) utilized?

980. How is performance assessment used in making future award decisions including options and extend/compete decisions?

981. Are any governance changes sufficient to impact achievement?

982. What are best practices for delivering and developing training evaluations to maximize the benefits of leveraging emerging technologies?

983. To what degree are the goals realistic?

984. Can your organization rate by exception and assume that most employees are performing at an acceptable level?

985. What changes do you need to make to align practices with beliefs?

986. What are the staffs preferences for training on technology-based platforms?

987. What are acceptable governance changes?

988. Does adaptive training work?

989. To what degree are sub-teams possible or necessary?

990. To what degree does the teams approach to its work allow for modification and improvement over time?

991. To what degree can all members engage in open and interactive considerations?

992. What is the target group for instruction (e.g., individual and collective or small team instruction)?

993. What are the standards or expectations for success?

3.10 Issue Log: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

994. Do you feel a register helps?

995. Can an impact cause deviation beyond team, stage or Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project tolerances?

996. What is a Stakeholder?

997. Is access to the Issue Log controlled?

998. Is the issue log kept in a safe place?

999. What would have to change?

1000. Are stakeholder roles recognized by your organization?

1001. Are the stakeholders getting the information they need, are they consulted, are concerns addressed?

1002. Who were proponents/opponents?

1003. Who is the issue assigned to?

1004. Why not more evaluators?

1005. Why multiple evaluators?

1006. Who is involved as you identify stakeholders?

1007. In classifying stakeholders, which approach to do so are you using?

1008. Who reported the issue?

4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1009. Is the schedule for the set products being met?

1010. Is there sufficient funding available for this?

1011. Overall, how does the program function to serve the clients?

1012. How was the program set-up initiated?

1013. Did the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team have the right skills?

1014. Use: how will they use the information?

1015. If a risk event occurs, what will you do?

1016. What good practices or successful experiences or transferable examples have been identified?

1017. How is agile Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project management done?

1018. Are the services being delivered?

1019. Do clients benefit (change) from the services?

1020. When will the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project be done?

1021. Were escalated issues resolved promptly?

1022. How is Agile Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Management done?

1023. Contingency planning. if a risk event occurs, what will you do?

1024. What do they need to know about the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1025. Who are the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project stakeholders?

1026. Purpose: toward what end is the evaluation being conducted?

1027. How many more potential communications channels were introduced by the discovery of the new stakeholders?

1028. What are the goals of the program?

4.1 Project Performance Report: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1029. How can Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project sustainability be maintained?

1030. To what degree does the teams work approach provide opportunity for members to engage in open interaction?

1031. To what degree can team members frequently and easily communicate with one another?

1032. To what degree do team members feel that the purpose of the team is important, if not exciting?

1033. To what degree does the information network communicate information relevant to the task?

1034. To what degree do team members frequently explore the teams purpose and its implications?

1035. How will procurement be coordinated with other Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project aspects, such as scheduling and performance reporting?

1036. To what degree do members articulate the goals beyond the team membership?

1037. To what degree are the tasks requirements reflected in the flow and storage of information?

1038. What is the PRS?

1039. To what degree are the demands of the task compatible with and converge with the mission and functions of the formal organization?

1040. To what degree will each member have the opportunity to advance his or her professional skills in all three of the above categories while contributing to the accomplishment of the teams purpose and goals?

1041. To what degree are the structures of the formal organization consistent with the behaviors in the informal organization?

1042. To what degree can the team ensure that all members are individually and jointly accountable for the teams purpose, goals, approach, and work-products?

1043. To what degree do the relationships of the informal organization motivate taskrelevant behavior and facilitate task completion?

1044. To what degree are the demands of the task compatible with and converge with the relationships of the informal organization?

4.2 Variance Analysis: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1045. Are there knowledgeable Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projections of future performance?

1046. Why do variances exist?

1047. Who are responsible for overhead performance control of related costs?

1048. Do the rates and prices remain constant throughout the year?

1049. Is all contract work included in the CWBS?

1050. When, during the last four quarters, did a primary business event occur causing a fluctuation?

1051. What is exceptional?

1052. Who is generally responsible for monitoring and taking action on variances?

1053. Who are responsible for the establishment of budgets and assignment of resources for overhead performance?

1054. Are overhead costs budgets established on a basis consistent with the anticipated direct business base?

1055. Are work packages assigned to performing organizations?

1056. What is the budgeted cost for work scheduled?

1057. What was the cause of the increase in costs?

1058. Did your organization lose existing customers and/or gain new customers?

1059. What is the actual cost of work performed?

4.3 Earned Value Status: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1060. When is it going to finish?

1061. What is the unit of forecast value?

1062. Where are your problem areas?

1063. Earned value can be used in almost any Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project situation and in almost any Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project environment. it may be used on large Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects, medium sized Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects, tiny Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects (in cut-down form), complex and simple Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects and in any market sector. some people, of course, know all about earned value, they have used it for years - but perhaps not as effectively as they could have?

1064. How much is it going to cost by the finish?

1065. How does this compare with other Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects?

1066. Validation is a process of ensuring that the developed system will actually achieve the stakeholders desired outcomes; Are you building the right product? What do you validate?

1067. If earned value management (EVM) is so good in determining the true status of a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project and Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project its completion, why is it that hardly any one uses it in information systems related Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects?

1068. Where is evidence-based earned value in your organization reported?

1069. Verification is a process of ensuring that the developed system satisfies the stakeholders agreements and specifications; Are you building the product right? What do you verify?

1070. Are you hitting your Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects targets?

4.4 Risk Audit: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1071. Should additional substantive testing be conducted because of the risk audit results?

1072. Are you willing to seek legal advice when required?

1073. Do you have a mechanism for managing change?

1074. Does the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team have experience with the technology to be implemented?

1075. Do you meet all obligations relating to funds secured from grants, loans and sponsors?

1076. Are team members trained in the use of the tools?

1077. Are policies communicated to all affected?

1078. Does your organization have an up-to-date constitution?

1079. What are the strategic implications with clients when auditors focus audit resources based on business-level risks?

1080. What does internal control mean in the context of the audit process?

1081. What are the outcomes you are looking for?

1082. Is all required equipment available?

1083. What can be measured?

1084. Are audit program plans risk-adjusted?

1085. Is the technology to be built new to your organization?

1086. Number of users of the product?

1087. Do you have an understanding of insurance claims processes?

4.5 Contractor Status Report: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1088. Who can list a Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project as organization experience, your organization or a previous employee of your organization?

1089. How is risk transferred?

1090. If applicable; describe your standard schedule for new software version releases. Are new software version releases included in the standard maintenance plan?

1091. Describe how often regular updates are made to the proposed solution. Are corresponding regular updates included in the standard maintenance plan?

1092. Are there contractual transfer concerns?

1093. What is the average response time for answering a support call?

1094. How long have you been using the services?

1095. What was the final actual cost?

1096. What was the overall budget or estimated cost?

1097. What was the actual budget or estimated cost for your organizations services?

1098. What was the budget or estimated cost for your organizations services?

1099. What are the minimum and optimal bandwidth requirements for the proposed solution?

1100. How does the proposed individual meet each requirement?

1101. What process manages the contracts?

4.6 Formal Acceptance: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1102. Does it do what Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team said it would?

1103. Is formal acceptance of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project product documented and distributed?

1104. Do you buy pre-configured systems or build your own configuration?

1105. Was business value realized?

1106. What is the Acceptance Management Process?

1107. General estimate of the costs and times to complete the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1108. Was the client satisfied with the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project results?

1109. Does it do what client said it would?

1110. Was the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project work done on time, within budget, and according to specification?

1111. Did the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project achieve its MOV?

1112. What function(s) does it fill or meet?

1113. Do you perform formal acceptance or burn-in tests?

1114. Who supplies data?

1115. What features, practices, and processes proved to be strengths or weaknesses?

1116. What can you do better next time?

1117. Was the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project managed well?

1118. Was the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project goal achieved?

1119. How well did the team follow the methodology?

1120. What are the requirements against which to test, Who will execute?

1121. Have all comments been addressed?

5.0 Closing Process Group: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1122. Were the outcomes different from the already stated planned?

1123. What was learned?

1124. What were the actual outcomes?

1125. How well did the team follow the chosen processes?

1126. How well did you do?

1127. Will the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project deliverable(s) replace a current asset or group of assets?

1128. What is the overall risk of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project to your organization?

1129. Just how important is your work to the overall success of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1130. Are there funding or time constraints?

1131. What will you do?

1132. What were things that you need to improve?

1133. Is the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project funded?

1134. What do you need to do?

1135. What can you do better next time, and what specific actions can you take to improve?

1136. Did the delivered product meet the specified requirements and goals of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1137. What could have been improved?

5.1 Procurement Audit: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1138. Are all claims certified by the officer giving rise to the claim (usually the purchasing agent)?

1139. Were no charges billed to interested economic operators or the parties to the system?

1140. Was the estimated contract value in line with the final cost of the contract awarded?

1141. Are the rules for automatic payment in computer programs approved by management prior to implementation?

1142. Were the documents received scrutinised for completion and adherence to stated conditions before the tenders were evaluated?

1143. Are there any complaints of the suppliers and/or end-users?

1144. Are all pre-numbered checks accounted for on a regular basis?

1145. How do you monitor behaviour of procurement staff?

1146. Are signature plates under the control of someone other than the individual given check-signing accountability?

1147. Does the procurement function/unit have the ability to apply public procurement principles and to prepare tender and contract documents?

1148. Are purchase orders pre-numbered?

1149. Are incentives to deliver on time and in quantity properly specified?

1150. Are buyers rotated so that they do not deal with the same vendors year in and year out?

1151. Does the procurement function/unit have the ability to apply electronic procurement?

1152. Are cases of double payment duly prevented and corrected?

1153. Does your organization make sources of information beyond the tender documents equally available for all the candidates?

1154. Is there no evidence of unauthorized release of information or seemingly unnecessary contacts with bidders personnel during the evaluation and negotiation processes?

1155. Are there reasonable procedures to identify possible sources of supply?

1156. Are buyers prohibited from accepting gifts from vendors?

1157. Has it been determined which areas of procurement the audit should cover?

5.2 Contract Close-Out: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1158. Have all contract records been included in the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project archives?

1159. Have all acceptance criteria been met prior to final payment to contractors?

1160. Parties: who is involved?

1161. Change in knowledge?

1162. Why Outsource?

1163. Parties: Authorized?

1164. What is capture management?

1165. Was the contract complete without requiring numerous changes and revisions?

1166. Change in attitude or behavior?

1167. Are the signers the authorized officials?

1168. How does it work?

1169. Change in circumstances?

1170. Have all contracts been closed?

1171. Was the contract sufficiently clear so as not to result in numerous disputes and misunderstandings?

1172. Was the contract type appropriate?

1173. Has each contract been audited to verify acceptance and delivery?

1174. Have all contracts been completed?

1175. How is the contracting office notified of the automatic contract close-out?

1176. What happens to the recipient of services?

1177. How/when used ?

5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1178. What were the desired outcomes?

1179. Planned completion date?

1180. What is the information level of detail required for each stakeholder?

1181. Was the schedule met?

1182. Does the lesson describe a function that would be done differently the next time?

1183. What information is each stakeholder group interested in?

1184. What benefits or impacts does the stakeholder group expect to obtain as a result of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1185. If you were the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project sponsor, how would you determine which Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project team(s) and/or individuals deserve recognition?

1186. Which changes might a stakeholder be required to make as a result of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1187. What are the marketing communication needs for each stakeholder?

1188. What are they?

1189. What security considerations needed to be addressed during the procurement life cycle?

1190. Was the user/client satisfied with the end product?

1191. Planned remaining costs?

1192. Were messages directly related to the release strategy or phases of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1193. Who controlled key decisions that were made?

1194. What is this stakeholder expecting?

1195. What stakeholder group needs, expectations, and interests are being met by the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1196. In addition to assessing whether the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project was successful, it is equally critical to analyze why it was or was not fully successful. Are you including this?

5.4 Lessons Learned: Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool

1197. How effective were the communications materials in providing and orienting team members about the details of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1198. How timely were Progress Reports provided to the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Manager by Team Members?

1199. How well is the build process working?

1200. Were any objectives unmet?

1201. Were any strategies or activities unsuccessful?

1202. Was any formal risk assessment carried out at the start of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project, and was this followed up during the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1203. Was the control overhead justified?

1204. What surprises did the team have to deal with?

1205. How many government and contractor personnel are authorized for the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1206. What are the performance measures?

1207. Are you in full regulatory compliance?

1208. Who had fiscal authority to manage the funding for the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project, did that work?

1209. Overall, how effective were the efforts to prepare you and your organization for the impact of the product/service of the Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1210. If issue escalation was required, how effectively were issues resolved?

1211. What skills are required for the task?

1212. How efficient is the deliverable?

1213. What was the methodology behind successful learning experiences, and how might they be applied to the broader challenge of your organizations knowledge management?

1214. How effective were Best Practices & Lessons Learned from prior Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool projects utilized in this Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project?

1215. Whom to share Lessons Learned Information with?

1216. How effective was Open Source Static Code Analysis Tool project Team member training?

Index

(Index page number references Only of use in Print Version)